Tag Archives: USA

by | January 8, 2026 · 10:11 am

Iran’s Bazaar Revolt Points to a Moment of Acute Regime Vulnerability

Iran is entering a period of heightened political risk as economic collapse, environmental stress, and elite defection converge in ways not seen for decades. The latest wave of unrest, which began on December 28 in Tehran’s Grand Bazaar, has spread across more than 100 cities, evolving from local economic protest into a broader challenge to the Islamic Republic’s authority.

While demonstrations are not new in Iran, the participation of the bazaar merchant class marks a potentially decisive shift. In Iran’s modern political history, the withdrawal of support by the bazaaris has tended to occur at moments of acute regime vulnerability and has coincided with major political realignments — most notably in 1978–79.

The Bazaar as a Political Barometer

The Grand Bazaar is the backbone of Iran’s domestic economy. Its dense networks of traders, wholesalers and importers connect supply chains, liquidity and social influence across the country. Historically, bazaar merchants have not functioned as a permanent opposition force. Instead, they have acted as pragmatic political actors, aligning themselves with whichever system appeared capable of guaranteeing stability, access and predictability.

In 1979, they withdrew support from the Shah and aligned with the clerical opposition. For more than four decades thereafter, they formed part of the Islamic Republic’s core economic coalition.

That coalition now appears to be fracturing.

When bazaar merchants close their shops, the impact goes far beyond symbolism. Commercial shutdowns disrupt distribution networks, freeze working capital and send a powerful signal that confidence in the state’s economic management has eroded. In Iran’s political system, such signals matter — not because they immediately bring down governments, but because they indicate that the regime’s traditional mechanisms of consent are weakening.

Economic Breakdown as the Catalyst

The immediate driver of unrest is economic collapse.

Over the past year:

  • The Iranian currency has lost approximately 60 per cent of its value
  • Food prices have risen by around 72 per cent
  • Medicine costs have increased by roughly 50 per cent
  • Inflation is estimated to be near 50 per cent

For many households, life savings have been effectively erased. For merchants dependent on imports, business has become unviable. The government’s decision to abolish subsidised exchange rates, combined with higher taxes, has sharply increased costs while currency volatility has made price-setting nearly impossible.

Compounding the crisis is a breakdown in basic infrastructure. Water reservoirs in several regions are reportedly at critically low levels, electricity supply is unreliable, and public services are deteriorating. The state is increasingly unable to provide core public goods: water, power, food security or employment.

In practical terms, the implicit social contract between state and society has collapsed.

From Economic Stress to Political Exposure

The scale and composition of the protests suggest that this is no longer a narrow economic dispute. Demonstrations now include merchants, workers and middle-class families, while confrontations with security forces have intensified. Dozens have reportedly been killed in clashes with the Revolutionary Guard.

The government’s response has oscillated between repression and improvised economic concessions. One widely reported offer — a small monthly payment to encourage protesters to disperse — was interpreted less as relief than as an admission of fiscal exhaustion.

Externally, the regime also faces heightened geopolitical pressure. Former US president Donald Trump has publicly warned of retaliation should violence against protesters continue. While such statements should be interpreted cautiously, Tehran remains acutely aware of Washington’s capacity to escalate economic and strategic pressure.

Political Realignment and the Search for Alternatives

As confidence in the Islamic Republic erodes, political symbols long considered marginal are resurfacing. Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last Shah, has declared that the current system is approaching the end of the road and has called 2026 “the year of change”.

There is no clear evidence that monarchist forces are directing the protests. But the re-emergence of such figures reflects a deeper vacuum: a growing search for legitimacy outside the clerical system itself. In moments of systemic stress, Iranian politics has historically gravitated toward realignment rather than reform.

Even within elite circles, unease is evident. Persistent reports of contingency planning by senior figures underscore the perception that the current unrest represents more than a temporary disturbance.

A Regime Under Structural Pressure

The Islamic Republic retains formidable coercive capacity, and regime change is far from inevitable. But the convergence of economic collapse, environmental stress and elite defection suggests that Iran has entered a phase of structural instability.

The withdrawal of bazaar support does not in itself determine political outcomes. Historically, however, it has signalled moments when existing power arrangements were no longer sustainable.

Iran may now be approaching such a moment.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

by | September 2, 2025 · 7:55 am

Lincoln and Kennedy: Coincidence or Something More?

For decades, people (including me/the editor) have been fascinated by the strange parallels between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Both were elected to Congress exactly 100 years apart, became president 100 years apart, were assassinated on a Friday, and were succeeded by men named Johnson. Their killers even share oddly similar details in their names.

At first glance, it almost feels supernatural—like history repeating itself in perfect rhythm. But is it really a mystery?

Historians point out that much of the similarity comes from selective perception. Out of the thousands of differences in their lives and presidencies, people naturally highlight the few coincidences that line up neatly. This is a classic example of confirmation bias: our brains are wired to notice patterns, even when they’re random.

Some “coincidences” are also simplified or exaggerated in retellings. For instance, John Wilkes Booth wasn’t really born in 1839 (he was born in 1838), and not every detail lines up perfectly. The myth has grown stronger as the story is passed along, making it sound more mysterious than it actually is.

So why do these parallels feel so compelling? Psychologists say it’s because humans crave meaning. We don’t like to think of history as chaotic or random; we prefer to imagine deeper connections. When two of America’s most famous presidents share some eerie overlaps, it’s easy to weave them into a narrative that feels fated.

Let`s take a closer look at all the coincidences, so we all can make up our own minds. What do you think? Is it a coincidence, and if not, what is it?

Did You Know? The Strange Coincidences Between Lincoln and Kennedy

Did you know that Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy share a series of coincidences that almost sound too incredible to be true?

Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846, while Kennedy followed exactly one century later, in 1946. Lincoln became president in 1860, and Kennedy in 1960. Both men placed civil rights at the heart of their political agendas.

The parallels don’t stop there. Both presidents were shot in the head, on a Friday, and both were succeeded by men named Johnson—Andrew Johnson (born 1808) after Lincoln, and Lyndon B. Johnson (born 1908) after Kennedy.

Even their assassins show a strange pattern. Lincoln’s killer, John Wilkes Booth, was born in 1838. Kennedy’s assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was born in 1939. Each is remembered by all three of their names—and each name contains exactly 15 letters.

The settings are equally eerie: Lincoln was shot in Ford’s Theatre, while Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car, made by Ford. Booth fled a theater and was captured in a barn. Oswald fired from a warehouse and was captured in a theater.

Coincidence? Maybe. But the uncanny parallels between Lincoln and Kennedy have fascinated historians and the public alike for decades.

If It Isn’t Coincidence: The Mystery of Lincoln and Kennedy

For over half a century, people have wondered: could the eerie parallels between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy be more than mere coincidence?

If we set aside the skeptics’ explanations of chance and pattern-seeking, a few intriguing possibilities emerge.

Some imagine history as a cycle, repeating itself in hidden rhythms. In this view, Lincoln and Kennedy weren’t just two presidents separated by a century—they were actors cast in the same recurring drama, destined to face similar trials at similar moments in America’s story.

Others lean toward mystical explanations. Perhaps the two men were linked by fate, or even reincarnation: the same soul returning to guide the nation in moments of upheaval. Civil rights, unity, and the fight against division marked both presidencies. Was Kennedy continuing a mission Lincoln began? And what about MLK, who was a Civil rights Champion? Also, he was shot.

There’s also a conspiratorial lens. If powerful forces engineered both assassinations, the similarities might not be accidents at all, but deliberate echoes—details designed to send a chilling message across generations.

And then there’s the possibility of a psychological pattern. Maybe leaders who challenge the status quo—who push too hard on civil rights and equality—are always bound to meet resistance, no matter the century. The echoes we notice could simply be the shadow of power repeating itself.

Whether it’s fate, conspiracy, or the cycles of history, one thing is sure: the Lincoln–Kennedy parallels continue to haunt us, because deep down, we sense that history is never entirely random.

The Lincoln–Kennedy Enigma

Some call it a coincidence. Others whisper of fate.

A century apart, two men rose to lead America. Both spoke of unity, of civil rights, of a brighter tomorrow. Both carried the weight of a divided nation. And both met their end in the same way—on a Friday, by a bullet to the head.

Lincoln and Kennedy. Different centuries, same story. Their successors bore the same name. Their killers mirrored each other, right down to the letters in their names. The pattern is too precise, too elegant, too cruel to dismiss as chance.

So what is it?

Is history caught in a loop, replaying itself like a record that can’t escape the groove? Are Lincoln and Kennedy two faces of the same destiny—one soul returning, unfinished business in hand? Or is it something darker? A hidden hand, weaving events to prove a point: that power never forgets, and those who challenge it will always fall in the same way.

The facts are real. The parallels are undeniable. What they mean… remains a mystery.

Maybe it’s a coincidence.
Maybe it’s fate.
Or maybe… It’s the shadow of history itself.

The Hidden Hand

They call it a coincidence. But in the dark corners of history, whispers tell of something else—the Hidden Hand.

The theory goes like this: whenever a leader rises to challenge the old order, to push too far, too fast, the Hidden Hand intervenes. It doesn’t wear a face. It doesn’t sign its name. It moves quietly, shifting events, nudging fate, until the outcome is sealed.

Lincoln, they say, stood in the way of a fractured nation healing on its own terms. He forced the issue—slavery, equality, the very definition of freedom. The Hand moved. Booth pulled the trigger.

A century later, Kennedy dared to dream of civil rights, peace with enemies, and a future outside the control of those who profited from conflict. Again, the Hand moved. Oswald fired from the window.

But who—or what—is the Hidden Hand?

Some say it is not a who at all, but a network: secret societies, power brokers, the guardians of wealth and order. Others believe it is older than governments, older than money—a force that ensures balance by cutting down those who rise too high.

The evidence is never written in books, never proven in courts. It lives in patterns, in eerie coincidences, in the silence that follows a gunshot.

Perhaps the Hand is real. Perhaps it is only the shape our minds give to chaos. But if it is real, one truth remains: it is still here, waiting, watching… ready to move again.

The Lincoln–Kennedy Code

Some say history is random. Some say it is written. Others… say it is programmed.

In the shadows, beyond the eyes of ordinary citizens, a code runs silently, threading events together like lines of invisible text. Lincoln and Kennedy—they were anomalies in the system. Two points of interference, two glitches in the simulation, pulling at the edges of the Matrix.

Lincoln rose to challenge the rules of his time, daring to rewrite the moral algorithm of a nation. Kennedy, a century later, attempted to push the code even further, to open pathways the system never intended. And in each case, the system corrected itself. A gunshot. A Friday. A succession meant to restore balance.

The Hidden Hand, some theorists whisper, is not human. It is the program itself, self-correcting, adjusting the loops of history to prevent the simulation from destabilizing. Every coincidence—the names, the dates, the letters in assassins’ names—was a sign of the underlying code, a signature left for those who could see.

But the anomaly persists. Those who notice the patterns, who question why history repeats with such precision… they are the exceptions. And exceptions, in the Matrix, are dangerous.

Lincoln. Kennedy. The pattern is unfinished. The code is still running. And somewhere, beyond the veil of what we call reality, the system watches, calculates… and waits.

The Simulation

What if everything we know—history, life, even death—is not real? What if reality itself is a simulation, a construct designed to test, to teach, or simply to observe?

Some patterns seem too precise to be random. Lincoln and Kennedy, separated by a century yet eerily linked by dates, names, and deaths—are they just coincidences, or are they markers in the code? Every anomaly, every “glitch” in history, could be the system correcting itself, nudging events so the simulation stays on course.

Perhaps we are all characters in a program we cannot see, playing roles assigned long before we were born. Some of us notice the glitches: the strange parallels, the déjà vu, the moments when history repeats itself with impossible precision. And those who notice… are awakened, aware that the world is not what it seems.

Lincoln. Kennedy. The patterns are clues. The simulation is still running. And somewhere, unseen, the programmer watches, shaping reality one line of code at a time.

Short summary:

Lincoln–Kennedy Coincidences

  • Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
  • Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
  • Lincoln became president in 1860.
  • Kennedy became president in 1960.
  • Both were strongly concerned with civil rights.
  • Both were shot in the head on a Friday.
  • Both were succeeded by a Johnson:
    • Andrew Johnson (born 1808), after Lincoln
    • Lyndon B. Johnson (born 1908), after Kennedy
  • Both assassins are known by their three names, each with 15 letters:
    • John Wilkes Booth
    • Lee Harvey Oswald
  • Lincoln was shot in Ford’s Theatre.
  • Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car made by Ford.
  • Booth fled a theater and was caught in a barn.
  • Oswald shot from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Uncategorized

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | April 3, 2025 · 3:12 pm

The JFK Files: Why Are Some Details Still Classified?

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, remains one of the most controversial and heavily scrutinized events in American history. Over the decades, numerous investigations, conspiracy theories, and official reports have sought to uncover the whole truth. Despite the passage of time and multiple declassifications, a significant portion of the JFK files remains classified. But why? What does this continued secrecy mean, and does it suggest that the government is hiding something?

A Long History of Partial Disclosures

The U.S. government has released thousands of documents related to the Kennedy assassination over the years, particularly under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. This law mandated the release of all files by 2017, yet to this day, certain documents remain redacted or entirely withheld.

The government’s justification for keeping some files classified has largely centered around concerns for national security, protection of intelligence sources, and potential diplomatic sensitivities. However, skeptics argue that such reasoning raises more questions than answers.

What Could Be in the Withheld Files?

Given the intense public interest and the many theories surrounding JFK’s assassination, speculation runs wild about what remains hidden. Possible reasons for withholding files include:

  1. Protection of Intelligence Methods and Sources – Some documents could reveal the names of informants, spies, or covert operatives who were active in the 1960s and may have had ties to agencies like the CIA or FBI.
  2. Foreign Policy Sensitivities – The Cold War was at its height during JFK’s presidency, and certain classified documents could contain information about U.S. dealings with foreign governments, including Cuba and the Soviet Union. Some files might also relate to assassination plots against Fidel Castro, which were discussed within U.S. intelligence circles.
  3. Embarrassment to Government Agencies – The CIA and FBI were known to have monitored individuals and organizations connected to Kennedy’s assassination, including Lee Harvey Oswald. Some have suggested that withheld documents might reveal incompetence, negligence, or even involvement by elements within the intelligence community.
  4. Potentially Damaging Information on Other Figures – There is speculation that some documents might implicate high-ranking officials in actions that could damage their reputations or that of their agencies.

Does Continued Secrecy Indicate a Cover-Up?

Many Americans believe that the U.S. government has not been fully transparent about JFK’s assassination. Polls have consistently shown that a majority of the public doubts the official narrative that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. The continued classification of documents only fuels this skepticism.

If the government has nothing to hide, critics argue, then why not release everything? Some believe that keeping certain files classified is a way to avoid confirming suspicions that government agencies knew more than they initially admitted or were involved in activities that might have indirectly led to Kennedy’s death.

The Push for Full Disclosure

There have been numerous calls for the full release of all remaining JFK files. Former President Donald Trump initially pledged to release all documents in 2017 but later allowed some to remain classified due to national security concerns. President Joe Biden has also delayed full disclosure, citing similar reasons but promising incremental releases.

Some researchers and historians argue that delaying the full release of the JFK files only deepens public mistrust in government institutions. Others suggest that the files may not contain any groundbreaking revelations but are being withheld simply as a bureaucratic precaution.

Conclusion

More than 60 years after JFK’s assassination, the fact that some files remain classified raises serious questions. Whether the remaining documents contain explosive revelations or simply bureaucratic details, the continued secrecy surrounding them ensures that the debate over Kennedy’s death will persist for years to come. Until the full truth is known, speculation and conspiracy theories will continue to thrive.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | April 5, 2022 · 10:29 pm

From Unipolar world to Multipolar world

Do you remember when Vladimir Putin invited many world leaders to Russia`s annual Victory Day parade in Red Square on May 9, 2015? Do you remember that all the western leaders were boycotting that event because of the crisis in Ukraine?

Vladimir Putin said at that time that the U.S is trying to create a «unipolar world». Putin and Russia have used an address commemorating the 70th anniversary of victory over Nazi Germany to accuse the U.S of attempting to dominate the world.

I wrote an article about it on June 3, 2015, and you can read that article here. Cuba`s Fidel Castro shares Putin`s worldview. He released a new book called «Cold War – A warning for a unipolar world» on September 1, 2003. Castro said; «To endure the global struggle between the superpowers is bad. To live under the total hegemony of one of them is worse».

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

That`s exactly what the war in Ukraine is about. A world order. World dominance. But Putin stopped this big dream, which means we will go from a Unipolar world to a Multipolar world.

The U.S President, Barack Obama, and Germany`s Angela Merkel didn`t come. Neither did other Western leaders like UK`s Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Francois Hollande. Moscow has increasingly appeared to pivot away from Europe and focus more on developing relations with China, I wrote in the article at that time in 2015.

The Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, was the most high-profile guest on the podium next to Putin. Other presidents in attendance included India`s Pranab Mukherjee, Presiden Abdel Fatah al-Sisi of Egypt, Raul Castro of Cuba, Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, and Jacob Zuma of South Africa.

«The boycott illustrates the depth and breadth of the chasm now separating Russia and the West,» said Dmitri Trenin, head of the Carnegie Moscow Center.

But what is Putin trying to say when he claims that the U.S is trying to create a «Unipolar World?»

Unipolarity in international politics is a distribution of power in which one state exercises most of the cultural, economic, and military influence. Unipolarity is an interstate system and not an Empire. Unipolarity implies the existence of many juridically equal non-states, something that an empire denies.

Unipolarity is anarchical. Anarchy results from the incomplete power preponderance of the Unipole. Kenneth Waltz, argues that great power cannot «exert a positive control everywhere in the world.» Therefore, relatively weaker countries have the freedom to pursue policy preferences independent of the Unipol.

Unipolar systems possess only one great power and face no competition. If a competitor emerges, the international system is no longer unipolar. Kenneth Waltz maintains that the United States is the only «pole» to possess global interests.

So, here we are. We knew at that time that Russia appeared to pivot away from Europe and focus more on developing relations with China.

Russia in bed with China, India, and Africa means a new world order, and that coalition is powerful. Keep in mind that 50% of the world population lives in China and India alone. In terms of business; that is a huge market.

The unipolar world has come to an end.

The modern international order, system, and relations developed after the end of the Thirty Years’ War in 1618 – 1648, and the conclusion of the Westphalia Treaty in 1648. Raymond Aaron studied international relations and he said: «I call the international system a set of political entities that maintain constant relations and can be involved in a large-scale war».

It`s all a part of an evolution, and there are four types of structural organization of the international system: the Westphalian system (1648-1789) as a system of classical European balance, the Vienna system (1814-1914) the system of European concert, the Versailles-Washington system (1919-1939) with the main conquest, the League of Nations and the Yalta-Potsdam system (1945-1991), the crown of which is the creation of the United Nations.

There are three types of world order: unipolar, bipolar, and multipolar. The unipolar world order presupposes the domination of a single super-power that is ahead of all other states by its combined power.

The bipolar world order is transformed into a multipolar one when economic and military power comparable to the power of the two states is reached by other powers. In an equilibrium system, several large states maintain roughly the same influence on the course of the events, restricting each other`s excessive claims.

At the beginning of the twentieth century, the world was multipolar, but by the middle of the century, two World Wars and many smaller conflicts had created a bipolar model.

With the end of the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet Union, bipolarity was replaced by unipolarity. The United States began to play a major role. But that has come to an end.

Recent facts and events show that the United States cannot cope with the role of being the only pole in the current world order. They were unable to balance forces in the Middle East. Neither with their troops nor with the support of groups that tried to seize power. Therefore; the troops withdraw from the war in Afghanistan.

The old world order is gone forever. Now, the world has entered a period of uncertainty and increased risks, exacerbated by the inability of the United States and its allies to solve the global problems of our time.

Former Barack Obama adviser, President of the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haas introduced the concept of a world without states or a multipolar world in his book «A World in Disarray: America Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order.»

Nations must be prepared to surrender independence to world structures. The unipolar system has ended, and International relations in the 21st century will determine the situation of polarity. The power would be blurred rather than concentrated, and the importance of nation-States would diminish as non-state actors strengthened.

A multipolar system complicates diplomatic activity. it`s not just that they’re more actors in the polar world. It lacks the predictable fixed structures and systems of relations that characterize unipolar, bipolar, and multipolar structures.

The multipolar system will be difficult and dangerous, and international relations are undergoing a powerful transformation in the 21st century that changes the nature, structure, and essence of the international order.

A formation of a new model of international relations will be very painful and costly, and the entire world order will have to go through an era of turbulence. We had the pandemic. Now, we have a war, but there is more pain to come. There will be more economic and social hardships and it`s time for more world chaos.

The British philosopher and sociologist Sigmund Bauman said: «No one can consider themselves truly indispensable. Even the most privileged status can be temporary and suddenly change».

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

by | February 15, 2022 · 11:20 pm

The Canadian government is invoking the Emergencies Act against a peaceful Freedom Convoy

PM Trudeau and the Canadian government is invoking the Emergencies Act for the first time, and he will use it against a peaceful Freedom Convoy. PM Trudeau can provide for the use of the military, but he said it may not necessarily lead to that.

What he can do is temporarily suspend citizens’ rights to free movement or assembly. And the government is taking steps to stop the financial support of illegal protests.

The Emergencies Act is a law passed by the Parliament of Canada in 1988 which authorizes the federal government to take extraordinary temporary measures to respond to public welfare emergencies, public order emergencies, international emergencies, and war emergencies.

The law repeals the War Measures Act passed in 1914. It asserts that any government action continues to be subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the bill of rights.

Under the Emergencies Act, the federal Cabinet may declare a national emergency in response to an urgent and critical situation that cannot be dealt with by any existing law, and either is beyond the capability of a province to deal with it or threatens the sovereignty of Canada.

Before declaring a national emergency, the federal Cabinet must consult with provincial cabinets. In the case of a public welfare or public order emergency where the effects of the emergency are confined to, or occur principally in, one province, the Emergencies Act cannot be used in the provincial cabinet does not indicate that the situation is beyond the capacity of the province to deal with it.

The Emergencies Act lists several «public welfare emergencies» which result or may result, in danger to life or property, services, or resources, so serious as to be a national emergency. Public welfare emergencies include natural hazards such as fire, flood, drought, storm, or earthquakes, biological hazards including disease affecting humans, animals, or plants; and man-made hazards such as accidents or pollution.

The Canadian Security Intelligence Act, includes espionage, sabotage, detrimental foreign influences, activities that support the threat or use of violence for a political, religious, or ideological objective; or those activities which threaten to undermine or otherwise destroy, or overthrow the Government of Canada.

The Canadian Security Intelligence Act specifically notes that «lawful advocacy, protest or dissent» do not constitute «threats to the security of Canada».

After two years of lockdowns and restrictions, PM Trudeau said this; «This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people`s jobs, and restoring faith in our institutions.»

Trudeau is not preventing protesters to exercise their right to protest legally, but the news comes after the Ambassador Bridge, which is North America`s busiest land border crossing, reopened Sunday.

The Freedom protesters protested against the tyranny and Trudeau called them Nazis and threatened them with the Emergency Act and declared Canada to be a disgusting dictatorship. His popularity is at an all-time low of 16.

Narcissists are a big problem in the world today, and very often we see them in politics and the Mainstream Media. Their favorite weapon is always to gaslight their enemies. We saw it right after 9/11, and then after January 6th, and now in Ottawa in Canada. All peaceful protesters are considered to be domestic terrorists. But that is a big lie.

The truth is this; many of them are «targeted individuals.»

Trudeau will also regulate all crowdfunding and cryptocurrency under the terrorist financing act. Banks can temporarily freeze the personal and corporate bank accounts without a court order if these accounts are suspected of being used to support blockades, are protected from civil litigation if they chose to do so.

I talked with a friend of mine and he said something similar have happened to him. I told him that this has happened to me as well. At the beginning of April 2009, the stock market was at the bottom, I logged into my trading account and tried to buy some shares, but then, suddenly, something happened. They closed my account. Why?

I called the company and asked why they have closed my trading account. They said I need to sign a letter about money laundry and the terrorist financing act. Not only that. They also wanted to know my income, what my job is, who I`m working for, where I live, who I live together with, what interest I have in politics, if I know someone who is a politician, if someone in my family is engaged in politics, and so on.

What the heck is this? Do they want all this because I`m buying stocks? Come on maaaaaan.

I didn`t answer all the questions and I have never traded on that platform since then. It`s 13 years ago. I repeatedly ask myself; why did this come when we were at the bottom in the stock market? Is that a coincidence? Of course not.

According to Hanne Nabinu Heland, the Nobel Peace prize country in Norway is the worst country in Europe. Many people agree.

There is no doubt where this idea is coming from. I have seen this and many other disgusting things for years now. And there is no doubt that these people are collaborating. It`s a global network of crazy people that is gaslighting their enemies, which is ordinary people, or «we the people».

The New World Order elite have amassed wealth during Covid-19.

It seems like Canada, along with Australia, Italy, Austria and France are some of the nations that are most infiltrated by the globalists.

They attack Christian identity, more precisely the Catholic identity of these countries. We all remember when Notre Dame burned down in 2019. Was that a coincidence?

The global coup that in these two years of psycho-pandemic farce has been carried out by the globalist elite appears most clearly if we do not limit ourselves to considering what happened in individual Nations, but broaden our gaze to what has happened everywhere, writes his Excellence, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò at Global Research.

Various elite networks, transnational, financial, and governmental are working toward a common agenda. It`s the elite versus «we the people», and you are considered to be a domestic terrorist. This is how they are gaslighting you.

Most Americans and Europeans are left in the dark and have no idea that day by day their lives come under more control in order to clear the way for agendas of which they are unaware.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , ,