You all know that Legacy Media attacked Donald Trump, and continue to do it. But what the Legacy Media and all other people on the left side actually have done is completely wrong. And if you don`t react to the bad things they have done, you have to look at yourself in the mirror.
I`m serious folks. I`m not a doctor or a psychiatrist, but what we have witnessed is bullying. And that has become a really big problem in the West. Yes, not only in America but in the West. If you don`t like the bullying and want to change it, you must look at yourself in the mirror.
And if you want to change the world, you need to start with yourself, because it all starts within. That`s how easy this is.
Dr. Phil knows this much better than me because he has studied people for about 45 years. And he knows what he is talking about. But is he speaking up? Oh, yes he is. He gave a speech in Madison Square Garden a few days ago, and he talked about bullying.
Dr. Phil doesn`t like or agree with everything that Donald Trump does or says. Nor do I. Who does that? But Dr. Phil didn`t stand up for Trump. «Lord knows he doesn`t need me to stand up for him,» he said in the speech.
Just take a look at what the rude mob has done to Trump. «He`s tough as an old army boot. He`s got lots of enemies, different groups that are scared, and between them, they have impeached him, indicted him, raided him, railroaded him, shot him, and sued him. And where is he?
He is still standing. He just keeps on coming because he loves this country too, Dr. Phil said.
Dr. Phil had a speech at a Trump rally because he was standing up for the people who have declared their support for Donald Trump, or they got found out, or they want to do it but they`re too intimidated.
Intimidated? Yes, because you all know what happens when somebody in this country says, hey, I`m going to vote Republican, I`m going to vote Donald J. Trump?
As Dr. Phil said, they get canceled, intimidated, marginalized, excluded or even fired or boycotted. And you know what that means? In short, that adds up to being bullied!
And here comes the best part. Dr. Phil said, «Now we`re talking about something I know a hell lot about. Now you`re in my wheelhouse, buddy. I may not be an expert in politics, but I am an expert about bullying!»
Bullying is when you seek to harm somebody, you seek to intimidate, coerce, cause distress, fear, or risk to their well-being, and it can be physical, verbal, relational, or cyberbullying.
And it`s always wrong when you bully somebody. And that`s what`s going on.»
«Now, let me tell you what the critics are going to say when they hear me talking about this. They’re going to say, well, now wait a minute, come on. Isn’t Trump a bully? And let me tell you why the answer to that question is no.
Because to be a bully, there has to be an imbalance of power. And when there’s not, it’s just called a debate.
And he’s just better at it than anybody else. It’s called debating. It’s called arguing. It’s just – even name-calling. But it’s not bullying unless there’s an imbalance of power. And whoever he talks to, they’ve got a microphone, they got on their big-boy pants, they got a stage, they got everything else. He’s just better at it,» Dr. Phil added.
«And the same thing is true. When the Democrats or Harris call him fascist, Hitler, racist, misogynist, or a crook, is that bullying? Well, not really. It’s ugly. But with the First Amendment, which we all want to keep, there’s no imbalance of power, so it’s not bullying.
It’s just like when he does. It may not be the best use of energy, but when you attack civilians, when you attack a citizen and you use the power of the internet, you use mob mentality, you incite people to gang up and cause boycotts, then it’s beyond ugly.
And that’s what’s happening in this country right now, and that’s not OK. There is an imbalance of power there, and it’s time that every one of us close ranks. We have to stop this now,» Dr. Phil said in the speech.
And Dr.Phil is right. But this is not only a problem in the U.S.; we see it all over the West. Like I said earlier in this article, it all starts within. Take a look at yourself in the mirror.
Legacy Media is the worst bully machine we have in this society, and it`s disgusting to see how they have treated Trump for years. Absolutely disgusting. We also have to remember what Karma is. If you bully someone, the shit will sooner or later come back to you.
What comes around, goes around!
I don`t care much about politics and politicians, but I really care about bullying. Take action now. Look in the mirror, and change the world. Start today!
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Xi Jinping visited Vladimir Putin today, and they both called each other «dear friends.» Xi says China is ready with Russia to stand guard over world order based on international law, on Moscow visit earlier today. Xi added that with Russia, China was ready to defend the UN-centric international system.
Xi pushes China to play a more dominant role in managing global affairs. China`s New World Order is on the way.
This is what the war in Ukraine is about: the new world order. The war in Ukraine is set to fundamentally transform the International order, and some people call it the world`s «de-Westernization».
A World Order is an impressive work that focuses on the geopolitical distribution of power, Henry Kissinger wrote in his book World Order.
During the 20th century, political figures such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill used the term «new world order» to refer to a new period of history characterized by a dramatic change in world political thought and in the global balance of power after World War I and World War II.
The interwar and post-World War II periods were seen as opportunities to implement idealistic proposals for global governance by collective efforts to address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to resolve while nevertheless respecting the right of nations to self-determination.
Such collective initiatives manifested in the formation of intergovernmental organizations such as the League of Nations in 1920, the United Nations (UN) in 1945, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949, along with international regimes such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), implemented to maintain a cooperative balance of power and facilitate reconciliation between nations to prevent the prospect of another global conflict.
After World War II, they all said; «Never again», and the winners, led by America, drafted conventions that defined unpardonable crimes against humanity, and sought to impose costs on those committing them.
Recalling the economic disasters and human miseries that paved the way to world war, the framers of this order built the UN and other international institutions to promote cooperation and development.
Progressives welcomed international organizations and regimes such as the United Nations in the aftermath of the two World Wars but argued that these initiatives suffered from a democratic deficit and were therefore inadequate not only to prevent another world war but to foster global justice, as the UN was chartered to be a free association of sovereign nation-states rather than a transition to democratic world government.
British writer and futurist H.G. Wells went further than progressives in the 1940s by appropriating and redefining the term «new world order» as a synonym for the establishment of a technocratic world state, and of a planned economy, garnering popularity in state socialist circles.
Right-wing populist John Birch Society claimed in the 1960s that the governments of both the United States and the Soviet Union were controlled by a cabal of corporate internationalists, «greedy» bankers, and corrupt politicians who were intent on using the UN as the vehicle to create a «One World Government».
This anti-globalist conspiracism fueled the campaign for U.S. withdrawal from the UN.
In his speech, Toward a New World Order, delivered on 11 September 1990 during a joint session of the US Congress, President George H.W. Bush described his objectives for post-Cold War global governance in cooperation with post-Soviet states. He stated:
«Until now, the world we`ve known has been a world divided – a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict, and the cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the genuine prospect of new world order.
In the words of Winston Churchill, a «world order» in which «the principles of justice and fair play …. protect the weak against the strong…..»A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.»
The New York Times observed that progressives were denouncing this new world order as a rationalization of American imperial ambitions in the Middle East at the time.
And now, everything has changed. Again. China`s New World Order is coming.
We are moving from a Unipolar world to a Multipolar world where Europe and the U.S. are less influential. The war in Ukraine is dividing opinions between people in Western nations, and those in countries like China, India, and Turkey, a new poll suggests.
The war in Ukraine has laid bare the «sharp geographical divides in global attitudes» on «conceptions of democracy, and the composition of the future international order,» according to a new survey from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).
While Western allies have «regained their sense of purpose on the global stage,» the gulf between their perspective and the «rest» has grown wider, the ECFR added.
There are different views about the general role the West will play in the future world order. Some people expect a new bipolar world of two blocks led by the U.S. and China, whereas there were signs that most people in major non-Western countries see the future in more multipolar terms.
China has always been in front. The silk road is known for all the roads from China to Europe, and nobody knows how old it is, but it can be as old as ten thousand years. The silk road was popular because the Chinese sold silk to Europe.
Today, China is still in front as they are considered to be the factory of the world. But this is probably not a surprise for people in China. Why?
For more than two millennia, nomarchs who ruled China proper saw their country as one of the dominant actors in the world. The concept of Zhongguo (the Middle Kingdom, as China, calls itself), is not simply geographic.
It implies that China is the cultural, political, and economic center of the world.
This Sino-centrist worldview has in many ways shaped China`s outlook on global governance. The rules, norms, and institutions that regulate international cooperation. The decline and collapse of imperial China in the 1800s and early 1900s, however, diminished Chinese influence on the global stage for more than a century.
But China is back. China has reemerged as a major power in the past two decades, with the world`s second-largest economy and a world-class military. It increasingly asserts itself, seeking to regain its centrality in the international system, and over global governance institutions.
These institutions, created mostly by Western powers after World War II, include the World Bank, which provides loans and grants to developing states, the International Monetary Fund, which works to secure the stability of the global monetary system; and the United Nations, among others.
President Xi Jinping, the most powerful Chinese leader since Mao Zedong, has called for China to «lead the reform of the global governance system,» transforming institutions and norms in ways that will reflect Beijing`s values and priorities.
For over two thousand years, beginning with the Qin dynasty (221-226 BCE) and ending with the collapse of the Qing (1636-1911 BCE), monarchs who ruled China proper invoked a mandate of heaven to legitimate their own rule and rhetorically assert their own centrality to global order, even though they never built a truly global empire.
Even when China`s influence collapsed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Chinese elites dreamed of regaining global influence.
At the end of World War II, China became an initial member of the United Nations and seemed poised to play a larger role in the new international order. But after the Communist Party won the civil war and took power in 1949, China rejected the international system and tried to help create an alternative global governance order.
Frustrated with the existing international system, the Republic of China (Taiwan) remained seated on the UN Security Council, instead of the People`s Republic of China, Beijing promoted alternative values and institutions.
In 1953, Premier Zhou Enlai enunciated «The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence», mutual respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, mutual nonaggression, noninterference in each other`s international affairs, equality, mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence.
Endorsed by leaders of many newly independent former colonies, these principles formed a basis for the nonaligned movement (NAM) of the 1960s. NAM became a counterweight to Western-dominated global governance.
China returned to the international system in the early 1970s and rebuilt its ties with the United States. It accepted a weaker international role and sought to participate in the institutions and rules set up after World War II.
After the end of the Mao era, China opened up in the 1980s and 1990s, reformed its economy, and increased its role in global governance, including by cooperating with international institutions. During this time, China adapted many domestic laws to conform to those of other countries.
Deng Xiaoping, who ultimately succeeded Mao, oversaw major economic reforms in the late 1970s and early 1980s, which launched China`s growth and ultimately increased its global reach. Deng introduced market reforms, and encouraged inflows of foreign capital and technology, among other steps.
During this period, China also joined more global financial and trade institutions, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Intellectual Property Organization, and the Asian Development Bank.
In 1989, the Chinese government violently cracked down on democracy protestors in Beijing`s Tiananmen Square, and elsewhere in the country, which resulted in widespread international condemnation.
To help rebuild its reputation and ties with other countries, beginning in the early 1990s, Beijing increasingly embraced multilateralism and integration with global governance institutions. Beijing signed multilateral agreements it had previously been reluctant to join.
In the first decade of the twenty-first century, China often proved willing to play by international rules and norms. As its economy grew, however, Beijing assumed a more active role in global governance, signaling its potential to lead and challenge existing institutions and norms.
The country boosted its power in four ways; it took on a bigger role in international institutions, advertised its increasing influence, laid the groundwork to create some of its own organizations, and sometimes subverted global governance rules.
In 2010, China surpassed Japan to become the world`s second-biggest economy and earned the third-greatest percentage of votes in the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). It also created its own Multilateral Organizations.
China started to create its own Beijing-dominated institutions. A process that would expand in the 2010s. In the previous decade, Beijing had established the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which built on the earlier Shanghai 5 group, and brought together China, Russia, and Central Asian states.
In the 2010s, the SCO would become a vehicle for China to challenge existing global norms, such as pushing its idea of closed internet controlled by governments, rather than one global, open internet.
Under President Bush and Obama, Washington generally accepted that Beijing would increasingly support global governance norms and institutions. In 2005, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick publicly urged China to become a «responsible stakeholder» in the international system.
The Donald J. Trump administration, by contrast, has expressed greater concern over Chinese efforts to subvert existing norms and has pushed back against Beijing`s efforts to use international institutions to promote Chinese foreign policies and programs like the Belt and Road Initiatives.
But China challenges International norms and rules. Under Jiang Zemin`s successor Hu Jintao, China more openly challenged international norms. Beijing asserted that its sovereignty over disputed areas of the South China Sea was a «core interest,» and «non-negotiable, « despite participating in negotiations with other claimants.
Beijing also expanded its footprint in the South China Sea; it built military facilities on disputed islands and artificial features. And it expanded its aid around the world.
Since the early 2010s, as China`s economic and military power has grown, so too has its ambition and capability to reform the global governance system to reflect Beijing`s priorities and values.
Some of the priorities Beijing promotes in global governance are defensive in nature and reflect long-standing. Chinese aims: preventing criticism of China`s human rights practices, keeping Taiwan from assuming an independent role in international institutions, and protecting Beijing from compromises to its sovereignty.
Yet China also now seeks to shape the global governance system more offensively, to advance its model of political and economic development. This development model reflects extensive state control over politics and society and a mix of both market-based practices and statism in core sectors of the economy.
Xi Jinping has called for more shared control of global governance. He has declared that China needs to «lead the reform of the global governance system with the concepts of fairness and justice».
The terms fairness and justice signal a call for a more multipolar world, one potentially with a smaller U.S. role in setting international rules. The Donald J. Trump administration`s retreat from global leadership has added to China`s opportunity to fill the void and promote multipolar global governance.
China is now pushing for a bigger role in International agencies. Chinese officials lead four of the fifteen UN specialized agencies. They are also creating alternative institutions. Beijing is building its own, China-centered institutions.
In 2013, Beijing launched the Belt and Road Initiatives. A vast plan to use Chinese assistance to fund infrastructure, and boost ties with, other countries, like their neighbor Russia. Beijing`s more proactive global strategy serves the Xi administration`s dream of returning China to its past glory.
China`s evolving global governance strategy is most apparent in four major issues; global health, internet governance, climate change, and development finance.
China seeks to become a leader in global internet governance and to promote the idea of «cyber sovereignty». That a state should exert control over the internet within its borders. In October 2017, Xi Jinping unveiled his plans to make China a «cyber superpower.»
Globally, Beijing promotes its domestic cyber sovereignty approach to internet governance, which hinges on Communist Party control and censorship. Xi`s administration uses increasingly advanced technology to dominate the domestic internet and social media, blocking global search engines, and social media sites, and promoting domestic versions.
China`s domestic internet offers an alternative to existing, freer models of internet governance, and Beijing also uses its influence at the United Nations, and other forums to push countries to adopt a more closed internet.
Meanwhile, Chinese corporations such as Huawei, and CloudWalk have supplied repressive governments in Venezuela and Zimbabwe with surveillance tools like facial recognition technology.
And the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) contains a «Digital Silk Road Initiative» that includes inviting foreign officials to participate in workshops on information technology policy, including controlling the internet.
If China and Russia can set the standards for internet governance, they could pave the way for other countries to embrace cyber sovereignty, sparking a divided world with two internets. One is generally open, and the other is closed and favored by autocracies.
The world has become less democratic in recent years. Democracy is in decline. The number of people that have democratic rights has recently plummeted: between 2016 and 2022, this number fell from 3,9 billion to 2,3 billion people.
The world underwent phases of autocratization in the 1930s and again in the 1960s and 1970s. Back then, people fought to turn the tide and pushed democratic rights to unprecedented heights. But what now? Can we do the same again?
A new Chinese world order is coming, and they are not democratic.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Ivanka Trump introduced her father on the RNC on Thursday and she started to say that she is a proud daughter of the people`s president. He is is our commander-in-chief, champion of the American worker, defender of common sense and our voice for the forgotten men and women of this country, she said.
«I was shocked to see people leave major challenges unsolved, so they can blame the other side and campaign on the same issue in the next election. But Donald Trump did not come to Washington to win praise from the beltway elites.
Donald Trump came to Washington for one reason, and one reason alone: To Make America Great Again! Ivanka said.
Furthermore, she said; «We want a society where every child can live in a safe community and go to a great school of their choice.
We want a culture where differences of opinions and debate are encouraged, not canceled; where law enforcement is respected; where our country`s rich diversity is celebrated; and where people of all backgrounds, races, genders, and creeds have the chance to achieve their God-given potential.
This is the future that my father is working to build each day.
We were in the Oval Office, with my father`s top economic advisors, and the president was pushing to keep the promise he made to renegotiate the bad trade deals that had gutted millions of middle-class jobs.
Most of his advisors argued that the economy was so strong following our historic tax and regulatory cuts, that it didn’t make sense to risk «rocking the boat.»
After the meeting, as I walked with my father back to the Residence, he said, «You know, the reason this has never been done before is that our leaders haven`t had the guts.
When the economy is good, they settle for good, and when things are bad, they don`t have the will or ability, so they kick the can until it`s someone else`s problem.
He was right. If my father didn`t take on these fights, no one would.
In the moments that followed, President Trump refused to settle for a good deal, he wanted a great deal – and ultimately, that`s exactly what we got.
Donald Trump rejects the cynical notion that our greatest achievements are behind us – he believes that nothing is beyond our reach, and the best is yet to come. All my life, I have seen how my dad believes in the potential of each individual.
Four years ago in Cleveland, I said that President Trump would deliver for working women. Last year, over 70% of all new jobs were secured by women.
During President Trump`s first three years in office, 72% of new jobs went to Americans who had been OUT of the workforce.
Just weeks ago, he re-wrote history by making a peace agreement in the Middle East – the biggest breakthrough in a quarter-century.
For the first time in a long time, we have a president who has called out Washington`s hypocrisy and they hate him for it.
Dad, people attack you for being unconventional, but I love you for being real, and I respect you for being effective.
Our President refuses to surrender his beliefs to score points with the political elite.
To my father, you are the elite. He only cares about scoring points with you.
If these problems were easy to solve, previous presidents would have done so. But you don`t achieve different results by doing things the same way.
Washington has not changed Donald Trump. Donald Trump has changed Washington.
America doesn`t need another empty vessel who will do whatever the media and the fringe of his party demands.
Now more than ever, America needs four more years of a Warrior in the White House.»
To contact the author; post@shinybull.com
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
«Pro-life» student Maddie Mueller is banned from wearing a MAGA-hat at high school in Northern California. They said is wasn`t a school hat or a hat from a school club or activity, but Maddie said she will sue the school for this.
Maddie Mueller will follow Nick Sandman. She sues the school district after being told she cant wear a MAGA-hat, claiming the dress code ban violates her first amendment rights. School officials say they simply dont allow certain logos as part of the dress code, but Maddie Mueller said MAGA is not a logo. She said she just trying to show pride in her country. How is that inappropriate?
For some people, wearing a MAGA-hat has become not only a sign of their political allegiance, but an act of rebellion. And if you are conservative, you are considered to be stupid or a racist. But all this is a myth. A lie. Fake news.
«The Destroy Trump Media» have repeatedly said that Trump is a racist. A Nazi. Bernie Sanders said so too; Trump is a racist, he said. Earlier today, former American attorney Michael Cohen also said president Trump is a racist.
Academia and Media are both on the left side and they very often claim that president Trump is a racist. But there is something wrong if school teachers are telling people what to wear or not. People have rights and the First Amendment which is made in 1791 is clear:
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws which respect an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
First amendment is one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
The same happened to Nick Sandman who met with Nathan Phillips. Media attacked Sandman and his friends for being racists, but they were wrongly accused for that. Media and Celebs are now sued for their sick behaviour.
Nathan Phillips who is a Native American sung and played on his drum in front of a lot of Covington students. But what happened? The Destroy Trump Media falsely accused the Catholic Students for being racists.
Now, the students have sued WAPA (Washington Post) for $250 million. The 22-page lawsuit claims the WAPA ignored journalistic standards and bullied Nick Sandman for three days. Sandman said he was misrepresenting in the media.
High powered lawyer who is representing Sandman have sent more than 50 letters to the media. Nick Sandmans attorney says he did nothing to deserve being attacked, vilified and bullied, and president Trump cheers the Covington students lawsuit against WAPA.
There are many losers here. Journalists and Celebs have rushed to delete tweets smearing MAGA-hat kids. Together with the «Hate Trump Media», they all made wrong decisions. In their world you are guilty until proven innocent.
Who are these people? Is it low IQ people? Or is it a mental disorder? They smear and destroy people without any evidence.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Bernie Sanders announced earlier today that he is running for presidency 2020. He is a democratic socialist on the left side who is fighting against president Donald Trump who is a Republican, businessman and a capitalist on the right side. Left vs Right. Socialism vs Capitalism.
President Donald Trump had a very strong and powerful state of the union speech a few days ago. In the speech, he made it clear that the U.S will never be a socialist state. The contrast between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders could not be clearer.
We all know that the «hate Trump media» are working close with people on the left side, and we all know that the «hate Trump media» are attacking him every day. We also know that FBI and the Deep State are on the same team. They try to destroy him.
Bernie Sanders said in his speech on Tuesday that people are living in a pivotal and dangerous moment in American history. Furthermore, he said «We are running against a president who is a pathological liar. A fraud. A racist. A Sexist. A Xenophobe, and someone who is undermining American democracy as he leads us in an authoritarian direction.
This is exactly what the «hate Trump media» have told us in years now and Mr Sanders obviously share this ideas.
He said «I am running for president because now more than ever we need leadership that brings us together. Not divides us up. Women and men, black, white, latino, Native American, Asian American, gay and straight, young and old, native-born and immigrant; Now is the time for us to stand together.»
«I`m running for president because we need leadership that will fight for working families and the shrinking middle class. Not just the 1%»
«We need a president who understand that we can create millions of good-paying jobs. Rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and constructing the affordable housing we desperately need.»
«I`m running for president because we need trade policies that reflect the interest of workers and not multinational corporations. We need to raise the minimum wage to a living wage.”
«I`m running for president because we need to understand that artificial intelligence and robotics must benefit the needs of workers. Not just corporate America and those who own that technology.»
At the end of the speech, Mr Sanders said; «together we can create a nation that leads the world in the struggle for peace and for economic, racial, social and environmental justice. And together, we can defeat Donald Trump and repair the damage he has done to our country.»
President Donald Trump are working hard to make America great, but according to Bernie Sanders, he have destroyed the country. Whaaaaat?
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Ket Garden
Shiny bull 