Tag Archives: EU

by | September 16, 2025 · 10:25 am

Britain Is Awake: How the Assassination of Charlie Kirk Sparked a Global Uprising

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sent shockwaves far beyond the United States. What began as a national tragedy is rapidly becoming a global turning point. From Britain to South Korea, millions are taking to the streets — people who say they have been ignored, dismissed, and demonized for decades are now finding their voice.

And the world’s elites are paying attention.

Donald Trump, who has spoken for years about the silent majority, is now seeing those people rally in the open. They see him as their voice, and they refuse to be silenced after Kirk’s death. They march not out of hatred, but out of love — for their own countries, their people, and their futures.

Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson Call Out Britain’s Decline

In a live broadcast, Tommy Robinson spoke on stage while Elon Musk joined via satellite. Musk warned that Britain is experiencing “a slow but rapidly accelerating erosion” driven by mass uncontrolled migration and government failure.

“The government has failed in its fundamental duty to protect its own citizens, including children,” Musk said. “This has to stop. There must be massive government reform, and the people need to be in charge — not an uncaring bureaucracy.”

Robinson questioned Musk about his commitment to free speech. Musk replied that without it, “you can’t get to the truth. Democracy only works when people are free to debate.”

“A Government Against the People”

Both Musk and Robinson argued that Britain’s government no longer represents the interests of its people. “It has become a government against the people — not for the people,” Musk said.

They condemned censorship, political persecution, and the culture of fear that silences citizens. They pointed to how many on the left celebrate violence and openly cheered Kirk’s murder. “Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you,” Musk warned. “You either fight back, or you die.”

The Woke Culture Debate

Robinson also inquired about Musk’s views on the rise of “woke culture” and its impact on innovation. Musk argued that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies often reward identity over merit, which he called “super racist, super sexist, and anti-Christian.”

“We should make decisions based on talent, hard work, and integrity,” Musk said. “Not on sex, race, or religion. The woke virus is the opposite of fairness and common sense.”

Media, Migration, and Hidden Agendas

The two went on to accuse Britain’s media of covering up the crisis. “The BBC is complicit in Britain’s destruction,” Musk claimed. “You, the people, are paying for the BBC. And you’re forced to pay for your own destruction.”

They argued that mass migration is used as a political strategy — a way to import new voters to secure left-wing power. Musk called it “a strategy that will succeed if it’s not stopped.”

Technology, Censorship, and the Future

Asked whether platforms like X or AI could give power back to ordinary people, Musk warned that technology alone can’t save democracy. “It depends on the government in charge. A corrupt government will use technology to suppress the people. Britain needs a new government — and it can’t wait four years.”

He called for the dissolution of Parliament and fresh elections. “You have to fight for your future. If not, there won’t be a future,” he said.

Hope Amid Decline

Musk lamented Britain’s decline from a bold, innovative nation into one “stifled by bureaucracy” and regulation. He said leaving the EU was the right move, but Britain has “stayed on EU-style regulations and even made them worse.”

“Civilization is fragile,” Musk concluded. “If the people of Britain take charge and install a government that truly represents them, Britain can have a great future. But we must fight for it.”

“If the people of Britain take charge and ensure there’s a government that represents their interests—and not foreign interests—then Britain has a great future,” Musk said.
“Many British people had lost hope,” Robinson added. “But after today’s scene, you’ve got hope again, Britain. Britain is awake!”

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | September 9, 2025 · 3:23 pm

The Global Debt Crisis is an Unseen Time Bomb

When discussions about debt dominate the headlines, the United States is often the central focus. With a debt-to-GDP ratio of 124.3%, it’s easy to understand why. But the U.S. is far from alone in facing a massive fiscal challenge. Other advanced economies are carrying even heavier burdens, and the global implications are both profound and often overlooked.

Japan: The Debt Giant

Japan holds the world’s highest debt-to-GDP ratio at 236.7%. Decades of low growth, heavy public spending, and an aging population have pushed the country into uncharted fiscal waters. While Japan has avoided crisis thanks to strong domestic savings and near-zero interest rates, the sustainability of this model is under constant scrutiny.

Italy: Europe’s Weak Link

Close behind is Italy, with a staggering 135,3% debt-to-GDP ratio. Burdened by structural economic weaknesses, sluggish productivity, and political instability, Italy has long been considered one of the eurozone’s most fragile economies. A sudden shock, whether financial or political, could easily ripple across the European continent.

The United States: A Growing Concern

At 124.3%, U.S. debt levels are higher than at any point since World War II. Unlike Japan, the U.S. relies heavily on international investors to finance its debt. Rising interest rates and political gridlock over fiscal policy only increase the risks. Given the U.S. dollar’s central role in the global financial system, instability in this market could have widespread consequences worldwide.

France and Canada: Silent Strugglers

France, at 113%, and Canada, at 110.8%, are also far above the traditional sustainability threshold (often pegged at around 60% of GDP). Both countries face demographic pressures, high social spending, and the challenge of funding welfare states without stifling economic growth.

Why It’s Unsustainable

High debt levels limit governments’ flexibility. In times of crisis, whether another pandemic, a war, or a financial meltdown, nations with already bloated balance sheets have little room to maneuver. Debt servicing costs also divert resources away from critical areas, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

A Global Time Bomb

The global debt problem isn’t isolated. The IMF warns that mounting debt in advanced economies could spill over into emerging markets, sparking instability across the financial system. With inflation still high and interest rates rising, debt servicing costs are growing rapidly. Unless meaningful reforms are enacted, the world may be heading toward a reckoning.

Conclusion

It’s easy to point fingers at the U.S., but the debt problem is truly a global issue. Japan, Italy, France, and Canada. All highly developed nations are carrying unsustainable debt loads that could destabilize the global economy. For now, markets remain calm, but history has shown that debt crises often strike suddenly and with devastating force. Without coordinated efforts to rein in borrowing and restore fiscal discipline, the next major crisis may already be quietly brewing.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Emerging markets, Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | November 13, 2024 · 4:21 pm

EU, NATO, and PESCO: Allies or Competitors?

Some people love Trump, and some people hate him. 75 million voted for Trump and they are satisfied. Trump and his supporters believe a «golden era» is coming. But people on the other side are scared as hell. They believe that Trump will take the U.S. out of NATO. That doesn`t make sense. What in the world is going on here?

I`m sick and tired of the blame game we see. Legacy Media is blaming Trump for all the wrong things that are going on. And some people believe in it. Europe is building its own defense system, and don`t blame Trump for that.

It can be a huge problem, but it can also be great. But are we friends or foes?

EU, NATO, and PESCO

The European Union’s push to develop its own defense capabilities through initiatives like PESCO (Permanent Structured Cooperation) has sparked discussion over its future relationship with NATO and the United States. While NATO has been the backbone of European security since its founding in 1949, Europe’s focus on an independent military framework reflects a changing security landscape. Although the U.S. and EU share foundational values of freedom and peace, recent defense dynamics raise questions about the stability of this historic alliance.

NATO and the Trump Era: Increased Accountability

During his presidency, Donald Trump pressed NATO members to meet the alliance’s defense spending guideline of 2% of GDP, arguing that the U.S. bore too much of the financial burden for European security. This pressure led to significant increases in European defense budgets and served as a catalyst for Europe’s own defense initiatives. Contrary to fears of Trump wanting to leave NATO, his administration actually reinforced the alliance by pushing members to fulfill their financial commitments. As a result, Europe began preparing for a future where it could play a larger role in its own security.

The Emergence of PESCO: Europe’s Bid for Strategic Autonomy

PESCO represents the EU’s efforts to streamline its defense policies and collaborate more closely on security issues. Established in 2017, PESCO involves 25 EU member states who have agreed to invest, plan, develop, and operate defense capabilities collaboratively. The initiative seeks to address European security needs in a manner complementary to NATO, ensuring that Europe can act independently if required while supporting NATO’s broader objectives.

While some interpret PESCO as a step toward a “European army,” EU leaders have emphasized that the initiative is not intended to replace NATO but to strengthen Europe’s defense posture. The goal of “strategic autonomy” remains complex, as Europe’s leaders debate how to balance independence with their commitment to the NATO alliance.

Complex Relations Between Allies: NATO, PESCO, and the U.S.

The relationship between the EU and the U.S. is marked by shared interests but also significant challenges. Traditionally, both have aligned on security matters through NATO, yet the EU’s pursuit of PESCO hints at a desire for more independent decision-making. In scenarios where U.S. priorities shift toward the Indo-Pacific, Europe’s stronger defense mechanisms could offer the flexibility to address regional security concerns independently, such as issues in North Africa and Eastern Europe.

At the same time, a divergence in priorities, such as differing views on China or the Middle East, could test NATO’s cohesion. NATO’s structure requires a consensus, meaning that conflicting EU and U.S. agendas might hinder unified responses to global crises. Europe’s need for strategic autonomy may strengthen its regional security, but risks duplicating NATO’s efforts without close alignment, raising concerns about potential inefficiencies and gaps in defense.

Russia, Ukraine, and NATO’s Role

The Russian invasion of Ukraine underscored NATO’s role in European security. NATO’s support for Ukraine demonstrates the alliance’s commitment to European stability and its role in deterring aggression on the continent. However, NATO members have been cautious about allowing Ukraine to join as a full member due to the potential escalation with Russia. This ongoing conflict has prompted European nations to reconsider their dependence on U.S. security support, highlighting the importance of a robust European defense capability within PESCO while maintaining NATO’s strategic unity.

Challenges and Opportunities for NATO and EU Cooperation

In an ideal scenario, NATO and PESCO would complement each other, with Europe taking on more regional security responsibilities to balance the alliance. A stronger European defense framework could allow the U.S. to address global priorities while ensuring Europe’s security. However, if cooperation between the EU and NATO falters, their overlapping efforts could result in competition rather than synergy, impacting collective peace and stability.

The rise of cyber threats, climate change, and global health crises underscores the need for close transatlantic coordination. NATO’s historical role has been to unify Western democracies under a shared vision of freedom and peace. As the EU strengthens its defense mechanisms, NATO’s role may evolve, necessitating a recalibrated approach that respects Europe’s pursuit of autonomy while preserving shared security interests.

Conclusion: A Balanced Path Forward

The EU’s defense initiatives through PESCO represent a logical evolution in Europe’s security landscape, reflecting both its commitment to NATO and its desire for greater self-reliance. This development could reinforce NATO by sharing the security burden more equitably. However, maintaining cohesion and avoiding unnecessary duplication is essential. The EU and the U.S. must prioritize open dialogue and collaboration to ensure that NATO and PESCO complement each other, creating a resilient security framework for the modern world.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

by | September 25, 2024 · 10:50 am

Germany enjoyed the so-called «Wirtschaftswunder,» (economic miracle) but that has come to an end

For decades, Germany was synonymous with economic strength. Ever since World War II, it enjoyed the so-called «Wirtschaftswunder,» or economic miracle that followed the postwar recovery, which blessed Germany with almost four decades of high growth.

High growth thanks to German engineering, and manufacturing industries. The economic growth eventually slowed down, but Germany had established itself as the industrial heart of Europe, fueled by exports of products with large margins like cars machinery, and chemicals.

Companies like Volkswagen, BMW, Siemens, and BASF became global leaders with German products seen as pinnacles of quality and reliability. As a result of all that, people in Germany enjoyed high salaries, and high quality of life.

Their economic model was built on a few key pillars; strong manufacturing base. A highly skilled workforce, commitment to quality, and very strong exports. But this has come to an end. Last year, Germany was the only G-7 economy to shrink. It`s also the group`s slowest-growing economy with a growth to GDP at -0.1%.

It goes up and down. Down -0,5, up 0,1, down, 0,1, up 0,2, down -0,4, up 0,2, and then down again to -0,1.

Picture: Old economy vs New economies

Germany, long considered the economic engine of Europe, is currently facing significant challenges, leading to concerns that its economy may be stalling or «broken.» What in the world is happening in Germany, and what are the key factors that are affecting their economy right now?

It`s an energy crisis. Germany was dependent on Russian Gas. Germany relied heavily on Russian natural gas before the war in Ukraine. The subsequent sanctions and supply disruptions have led to a severe energy crisis, pushing up prices and harming energy-intensive industries like chemicals, manufacturing, and heavy machinery.

They also have a green transition challenge. Germany is trying to transition to renewable energy, but the shift away from nuclear and coal has left the country vulnerable during this energy crunch. This has increased costs for businesses and households, causing slower growth.

Germany`s economy is heavily reliant on exports, especially in industries like automotive and machinery. Global demand has softened, and supply chain disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic continue to affect production.

The German auto industry, in particular, has been slow to transition to electric vehicles compared to competitors like Tesla, and Chinese manufacturers. This lag is putting pressure on a key pillar of the country`s economy.

Germany`s economy narrowly avoided recession in early 2023, but growth remains sluggish. High inflation and low consumer spending have contributed to weak economic activity. The combination of rising wages, energy prices, and inflationary pressures has increased production costs, leading to reduced profitability for businesses.

On top of that, you have an aging population. Germany`s population is aging rapidly, and the working-age population is shrinking. This is leading to labor shortages in key sectors and higher social welfare costs, creating long-term economic challenges.

In addition; they have migration struggles. While the country has relied on immigration to fill gaps in the labor market, recent shifts in public sentiment and policy restrictions have made it harder to sustain this approach.

Their biggest companies have been there for about 100 years, but there is a shift in the market. Germany has been criticized for lagging behind in digitalization and innovation, particularly in fields like AI and tech start-ups. This is reducing its competitiveness in the global economy.

Another problem is Germany`s heavily regulated business environment and complex bureaucracy. This can stifle innovation and make it harder for new businesses to scale up.

Like many others, Germany has trade challenges and the global demand is weak. As the global economy faces uncertainty, especially with China`s slowing growth, demand for Germany`s exports has dropped.

Germany`s economic model has long been dependent on strong export markets, so this is a major issue!

At least; EU Tension. Economic divergence within the European Union, especially between northern, and southern European economies, adds another layer of complexity, affecting Germany`s trade relations within the bloc.

It all started in France. Yellow Vest protesters went to the streets for months and years and protested against higher oil prices, electricity bills, and expensive toll stations. Their standard of living was shrinking.

This happened at a time when Donald Trump was cutting taxes and made the best economy in the U.S. ever. People in France asked for a Trump-like figure, but everything has gone straight up since then, and now we see severe problems in Germany and other places.

Picture: Yellow Vest protesters against high oil prices and low standard of living

This is happening at a time were productivity in the U.S. is great. Germany`s productivity is down -0,1%, while the productivity in the U.S. is up 3%. They are the best. They are at the top of the list! Even better than China! And the stock market goes up. Wow!

Germany`s economy is not «broken,» but it is facing severe challenges. Energy costs, inflation, global demand weakness, and structural issues in key industries like manufacturing are causing slower growth.

Long-term concerns like demographic changes and lagging investment in innovation also threaten future competitiveness. While these challenges are significant, Germany has strong economic fundamentals and could recover with strategic reforms and investments.

However, the current climate is tough, and the country is at a critical point in addressing these issues. Germany is in trouble.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | November 30, 2022 · 7:25 pm

Elon Musk is at war with Apple

Tesla`s CEO, and the new owner of Twitter, Elon Musk, is at war with Apple. Musk says Apple threatened to remove Twitter from the App store. Not only that. Apple has also stopped advertising on Twitter.

On Monday, Elon Musk tweeted: «Apple has also threatened to withhold Twitter from its App Store, but won`t tell us why.»

Apple is the world`s most valuable company and has huge power. The company was the top advertiser on Twitter and accounted for more than 4 percent of Twitter`s revenue in the first quarter of this year.

Photo by Brett Jordan on Pexels.com

Apple spent nearly $50 million on ads on Twitter, which is a huge loss for a company like Twitter. But if Apple were to block Twitter from its App Store, people would be unable to download the Twitter App on their iPhones, and iPads. It will also be problematic for existing users.

Twitter has warned investors in regulatory filings that the success of its services is dependent on their surviving review for compliance with App Store.

«Such review processes can be difficult to predict and certain decisions may harm our business,» the company wrote in a filing to the SEC last year.

«Failure to adhere to Apple`s and Google`s guidelines would be catastrophic, risking Twitter`s expulsion from their app stores and making it more difficult for billions of potential users to get Twitter`s services,» Yoel Roth, the company`s former head of Trust and Safety, wrote in a New York Times op-ed.

On Monday, Elon Musk also tweeted this: «Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter. Do they hate free speech in America?» But Apple didn`t respond to this.

Musk has attacked Apple in a series of tweets after his takeover. He sought to stoke long-running concerns and political scrutiny over Apple`s market power. He tweeted a link to a parody video that Apple foe Epic Games made in 2020 criticizing the App Store as a «monopoly.»

He also tweeted a yes or no poll, asking his more than 119 million followers whether Apple should «publish all censorship actions it has taken that affect its customers.» In another tweet, Musk said: «Did you know Apple puts a secret 30% tax on everything you buy through their App Store?»

But there are more problems for Musk and Twitter. The EU has raised the prospect of a substantial fine or ban for Twitter after warning that it must «significantly increase» efforts to comply with new online legislation.

Twitter`s new owner, Elon Musk, was told he had «huge work ahead» to comply with the EU`s Digital Services Act, which requires tech firms to tackle problems including abusive posts and disinformation.

«I welcome Elon Musk`s statement of intent to get Twitter 2,0 ready for the DSA,» the EU`s commissioner for the internal market, Thierry Breton said. «I am pleased to hear that he has read it carefully and considers it as a sensible approach to implementing on a worldwide basis. But let`s also be clear that there is still huge work ahead, as Twitter will have to implement transparent user policies, significantly reinforce content moderation and protect freedom of speech.»

The Financial Times reported that Breton reiterated the punishments for breaches of the act, which include fines of up to 6% of global turnover, which would be around $500m in Twitter`s case, or a temporary suspension of the service if refused to comply endangers people`s life and safety. Suspension is described by the EU as a «last resort.»

Musk has fired half of Twitter`s 7,500 staff since buying the company for $44 billion in October. Another 1,200 was leaving the company in November after Musk told the remaining staff to commit to being «hardcore» or leave.

In November last year, I wrote an article about Musk and his potential Tesla phone, the Model Pi Smartphone. A phone that is connected to your Tesla EV which is also connected to the Starlink satellite.

The Tesla smartphone Model Pi is equipped with a quality 4K screen, has four cameras, and is powered by Snapdragon 898 SoC chip. Is this the reason why Apple is threatening Musk and Twitter?

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters at Monday`s briefing that the White House was «keeping an eye on» Musk`s handling of Twitter.

There is no doubt: Elon Musk is at war with Apple.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , ,