Tag Archives: Donald Trump

Chinese President Xi Jinping said President Donald Trump`s state visit is a successful and historic visit

President Donald Trump visited Asia and China last week, and what a visit it was. We all know that Mr Trump want to Make America great again, but the relationship between China and America will not only Make America great again, but also the world.

China treated Mr Trump like a pop star with red carpets, military bands, a goose-steppping honor guard of soldiers and a twenty-one gun salute to name a few. Kids were jumping up and down with American flags as Trump`s motorcade passed. They also dined with Chinese president Xi Jinping in the Forbidden City.

Mr Trump is the first foreign leader accorded that honor since the founding of the Peoples Republic in 1949. Wow!

Xi Jinping said at the end of his speech that Trump`s state visit is a successful and historic visit. What did they do?

President Donald Trump is a business man. He colaborates with a lot of business people in China and have negotiated with Chinese businesses for a long time, so he know this game. In addition; he is a great negotiator.

Before he was leaving China, he and Xi Jinping announced business deals worth $250 billion. This deal is by many called Trump “miracle” deals.

Mr Trump is trying to correct the $350 billion trade deficit between China and the U.S, and he is on the way.

President Trump withdrew the United States from the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) in January this year and called it a bad deal. It seems like Mr Trump is trying to make a better deal and he is doing it for the American people.

They try to better protect labor and intellectual property rights. One TPP chapter spelled out commitments on environmental issues such as illegal wildlife trade and marine fishery protection.

Many of the other countries were not enthusiastic about the intellectual property rights and labor clauses in the original TPP agreement, because it tended to favor U.S interests.

Washington pushed for the labor, environmental and intellectual property commitments to save its own companies. Workers get paid more and treated better on average in the U.S compared to developing countries on the TPP roster.

They`re required to follow environmental laws at home, and American courts protect their trademarks, patents and copyrights. If equivalent firms in other countries avoid these practices, they can cut costs, or snag an outside trademark without paying.

This is very important for Mr Trump and the White House, and they will probably be patient and continue with its meetings regarding the best agreement possible. In the meantime, the other countries will continue its agreement without the U.S.

Mr Trump is the first foreign diplomat to be given a rare tour and private dinner in the Forbidden City since the People`s Republic of China was founded in 1949.

Donald and Melania Trump shared an afternoon tea with Xi Jinping and his wife Peng Liyuan at the Forbidden Palace Hall, and it was intentionally chosen for its historical and cultural significance that underscores cooperation between the two countries.

Mr Trump is doing everything he can to make America great again. Since he was elected a year ago, the stock market have gone straight up. Up, up, up and up. The stock market is up in all months so far this year, and that hasn`t happened in many decades. It is unbelievable.

People in America is also beginning to be very positive about the U.S economy. Consumer Confidence has gone straight up in months after months. That too, is unbelievable.

If Trumpism is the policies advocated by Donald Trump, especially those involving a rejection of the current political establishment and the vigorous pursuit of American national interests, and a controversial or outrageous statement attributed to Donald Trump, this is what it is;

TRUMPISM.

brand

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

———————————————–advertisement——————————————————-

Polo-banner-spotlight

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

If the Fed`s neutral rate is as low as they estimate or even lower, they will be glad to have their unconventional tools in their toolkit

President Trump will announce the next Fed Chair very soon. This is happening at a time were Mr Trump is planning a new tax reform. At a time were Mr Trump want to spend more money on infrastructure.

Mr Trump attacked Ms Yellen on the campaign trail and accused her for holding the rates too low, but he has halted any criticism of Yellen and the Fed since his inauguration. Now, Mr Trump say he like Ms Yellen and refuse to close down the possibility of reappointing her.

 

Ms Yellens term as a Fed Chair is about to end and the term is up for renewal early next year, but Yellens term as a governor on the Federal Reserve extends until January 2024.

So, if Mr Trump wants to “fire” Ms Yellen as a Fed Chair, she will still stay on the board even is Mr Trump dont want her to win the next term as a Fed Chair.

John Taylor and Jay Powell are among two of the other candidates on Mr Trumps shortlist. Anyway, whats interesting is their policy on interest rates.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen wrote an article about A Challenging Decade and a Question for the Future on the Fed`s own website. Her headline was a key question for the future. As the financial crisis and Great Recession fade into the past and the stance of monetary policy gradually returns to normal, a natural question concerns the possible future role of the unconventional policy tools we deployed after the onset of the crisis, Ms Yellen said.

My colleagues on the FOMC and I belive that, whenever possible, influencing short-term interest rates by targeting the federal funds rate should be our primary tool. As I have already noted, we have a long track record using this tool to pursue our statutory goals. In contrast, we have much more limited experience with using our securities holdings for that purpose.

Where does this assessment leave our unconventional policy tools? I belive their deployment should be considered again if our conventional tool reaches its limit, that is, when the federal funds rate has reached its effective lower bound and the U.S economy still needs further monetary policy accommodation.

Does this mean that it will take another Great Recession for our unconventional tools to be used again? Not necessarily. Recent studies suggest that the neutral level of the federal funds rate appears to be much lower than it was in previous decades.

Indeed, most FOMC participants now assess the longer-run value of the neutral Federal funds rate as only 2-3/4 percent or so, compared with around 4-1/4 percent just a few years ago. With a low neutral federal funds rate, there will typically be less scope for the FOMC to reduce short-term interest rates in response to an economic downturn, raising the possibility that we may need to resort again to enhanced forward rate guidance and asset purchases to provide needed accommodation.

Of course, substantial uncertainty surrounds any estimates of the neutral level of short-term interest rates. In this regard, there is an important asymmetry to consider. If the neutral rate turns out to be significantly higher than we currently estimate, it is less likely that we will have to deploy our unconventional tools again.

In contrast, if the neutral rate is as low as we estimate or even lower, we will be glad to have our unconventional tools in our toolkit.

The bottom line is that we must recognize that our unconventional tools might have to be used again.

If we are indeed living in a low-neutral-rate world, a significantly less severe economic downturn that the Great Recession might be sufficient to drive short-term interest rates back to their effective lower bound.

Ms Yellen concluded with this summary: As a result of the Great Recession, the Federal Reserve has confronted two key challenges over the past several years: One, the FOMC had to provide additional policy accommodation after short-term interest rates reached their effective lower bound; and two, subsequently, as we made progress toward the achievement of our mandate, we had to start scaling back that accommodation in the presence of a vastly expanded Federal Reserve balance sheet.

Ms Yellen highlighted two points about the FOMC`s experience with those challenges. First, the monetary policy tools that the Federal Reserve deployed in the immediate aftermath of the crisis – explicit forward rate guidance, large-scale asset purchases, and the payment of interest on excess reserves have helped us overcome these challenges.

Second, in light of evidence suggesting that the neutral level of short-term interest rates is significantly lower than it was in previous decades, the likelihood that future monetary policymakers will have to confront those two challenges again is uncomfortably high.

For this reason, we must keep our in conventional policy tools ready to be deployed again should short-term interest rates return to their effective lower bound.

things

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

———————————————–advertisement——————————————————-

Polo-banner-spotlight

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Quantitative Easing

Most of the JFK files have been released, and 1% is still hidden for the public but can be released today

Most of the JFK files have been released, but 1% is still hidden for the public. Why is 1% of the documents still is secret? It must be something very special because CIA Director Mike Pompeo said to Mr Trump not to release the rest of the documents.

Earlier this morning Mr Trump Tweeted this: «JFK Files are being carefully released. In the end there will be great transparency. It is my hope to get just about everything to public»! Mr Trump Tweeted that at 6:38 am today.

Conspiracy theorists around the world have long been waiting for the rest of the documents during the JFK assassination. But bad news can be on the way. Mr Trump can block some of the thousands of classified files.

It is about 3,100 documents left which is never before released, and most of them is created by CIA. Many are letters written at the spy agency to a special federal review board.

The deadline to release the documents are set today, and the deadline is set by Congress under a 1992 law signed by President George H.W Bush that was intended to try to tamp down conspiracy theories about the JFK assassination.

One of the main problems with this release is that some of the records within this collection were not created until the 1990`s, and some of them can be harmful to the national security if made public.

Mr Trump can be under pressure to block the release of some of the assassination documents on national security grounds, possibly to protect CIA tradecraft and the identity of agency informants who might still be alive, according to spokesperson at Politico.

Much of the documents were released by the Congress in response to Oliver Stones film «JFK». Millions of documents were released in the 1990s, but a few are left. Most of the documents were made by CIA, FBI and the Justice Department.

Some conspiracy theorists belive Bush can be in trouble if they release the rest of the documents. Others say Lyndon B. Johnson was the mastermind. Another theory is the father of Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and his links to Lee Harvey Oswald.

Jesse Ventura said in an interview with Larry King that Dorothy Kilgallen was ready to blow the lid of this JFK case, but a few days later she was found dead. Oswald was like many other witnesses taken off. This is how this case is a hot potato.

JFK had more enemies within his administration than Soviet and the rest of the world combined. Jack Kennedy had enemies in the military-industrial complex because he would not invade Cuba and wanted to end the war in Vietnam. He also wanted to take away the oil depletion allowance.

He was the first President to bring in civil rights and equality. On top of that he wanted to break the CIA into a thousand pieces and fired their top three guys like Allen Dulles. He was also communicating with Nikita Khrusjtsjov and they were gonna end the cold war by 1965.

Nikita was a Soviet politician who led the first Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1953 to 1964. He was responsible for the de-Stalinization of the Soviet Union.

In 1938, Stalin sent him to govern Ukraine. He was a political commissar during the Russian Civil War.

Jesse Ventura is so into this case so he wrote a book about it called 63 reasons to belive there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK. Larry King interviewed the policeman who arrested Oswald in the move theater, and Oswald said only one thing in the drive down to the police station:

«Im a patsy», and Oswald said it twice. «Im a patsy».

Conspiracy theories will be held alive if they block any of the documents. Opinion polls in recent decades have shown that the American people belive there was a conspiracy in Kennedy`s death, despite governments investigations that concluded Oswald acted alone.

A huge team of lawmakers on Capitol Hill has worked together in months to call for full disclosure of the JFK files. Some of the documents can still be kept in secret to protect the country, agents and agency`s but most of the documents will be released about the case that changed America.

Under the law, everything can be released today, unless Mr Trump decides otherwise.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

———————————————–advertisement——————————————————-

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Uncategorized

President Donald Trump is nearing a decision on whom to pick to lead the Federal Reserve

Fed Chair Janet Yellen`s job is coming to an end. She took over the job from Ben Bernanke who started to «print» money. Four years is over and President Donald Trump have a few but strong candidates on his table.

President Donald Trump had a meeting with Standford University economist John Taylor and according to a White House official, Mr Trump is nearing a decision on whom to pick to lead the Federal Reserve.

 

 

John Taylor is one of the candidates and Janet Yellen is the other one. Other candidates are Fed governor Kevin Warsh who is on Trumps shortlist. Current governor Jerome Powell and Trumps economic adviser Gary Cohn is also on the list.

Mr Trump has scheduled a meeting with Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen on Thursday.

Ms Yellen`s four-year term as chairwoman expires on February next year and Mr Trump will meet her to discuss the possibility of nominating her for a second term as central-bank chief. Mr Trump is considering offering Yellen the chance to stay in the job, but will announce his nominee before leaving for a trip to Asia next month on November 3.

John Taylor said he agree with the Fed`s strategy to remove economic stimulus, and the Fed policy rate is now set at 1 percent to 1,25 percent. What the right thing to do about the rate is a matter of debate among economists, also among Taylor and his camp.

John Taylor is a Ph.D economist with a strong expertise in monetary policy and institutional leadership which is key attributes for the Fed Chair, and this is probably why Taylor is one of the biggest favorite for Mr Trump.

Donald Trump is planning to cut the taxes and monetary policy is therefore critical and important.

Former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke started the QE program after the financial crisis in 2008, and Fed governor Warsh was against further monetary stimulus in 2010 with unemployment above 9 percent and inflation decelerating.

Ben Bernanke is an expert on the stock market crash in 1929, and called Warch`s political and markets savvy «invaluable,» according to Bloomberg.

Central banks are often independent from other policy makers. This is the case with the Federal Reserve and Congress, reflecting the separation of monetary policy from fiscal policy and the latter refers to taxes and government borrowing and spending.

The Federal Reserve has what is commonly referred to as a «dual mandate»:

  • to achieve maximum employment (around 5 percent unemployment), and
  • stable prices (2-3 percent inflation).

In addition, it aims to keep long-term interest rates relatively low, and since 2009 has served as a bank regulator. Its core role is to be the lender of last resort, providing banks with liquidity in order to prevent the bank failure and panics.

The central bank of the United States is the Federal Reserve System, which Congress established with the 1913 Federal Reserve Act.

Central banks are inherently non-market-based or even anticompetitive institutions. Many central banks, including the Fed, are not government agencies, and so are often touted as being politically independent.

Monetary policy consists of the actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory committee that determine the size and rate of growth of the money supply, which in turn affects interest rates.

There are two types of monetary policy; expansionary and contractionary.

Expansionary monetary policy increases the money supply in order to lower unemployment, boost private-sector borrowing and consumer spending, and stimulate economic growth.

Contractionary monetary policy slows the rate of growth in the money supply or outright decreases the money supply in order to control inflation, while sometimes necessary, contractionary monetary policy can slow economic growth, increase unemployment and depress borrowing and spending by consumers and businesses.

An example would be the Fedral Reserves intervention in the early 1980s: in order to curb inflation of nearly 15 percent , the Fed raised its benchmark interest rate to 20 percent.

This hike resulted in a recession, but did keep spiraling inflation in check.

Mr Trump is planning to cut taxes and build more and better highways, and this is fiscal policy, which is trying to control inflation, stabilize business cycles and to improve unemployment rate. Sooner or later, we all know that the recession will come.

The tools will then be fiscal policy and the government will start to lower tax rates to try to fuel economic growth. If people are paying less in taxes, they have more money to spend or invest, and increased consumer spending or investment could improve economic growth.

On the other side; too much spending could increase inflation.

 

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

 

———————————————–advertisement——————————————————-

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Uncategorized

20 years since Princess Diana`s death in Paris and Mainstream Media is a huge part of the story

On Thursday 31, it is 20 years since the tragic death of Princess Diana in Paris. The question is: was it an accident or a murder? The more you scrutinize this case, the more you realize that something is terribly wrong in this world.

Princess Diana was beautiful and extraordinarily popular royal figure. She was a fashion icon. She was the people`s princess, but also big business for the mainstream media. The press was a huge part of her life, but unfortunately, also a huge part of the story of her death.

 

diana

(Princess Diana dancing with John Travolta)

 

Princess Diana died on 31 August 1997. She was fatally injured in a car crash in the Pont de I`Alma road tunnel in Paris. Nobody knows exactly what happened in the tunnel and there is a lot of conspiracy theories out there.

Diana died along with her driver Henri Paul and her companion Dodi Fayed. Bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones was the only survivor, but he was also the only one with seatbelt on.

An inquest jury at the Royal Courts of Justice in 2008 ruled the couple were unlawfully killed. The ruling blamed the deadly crash on the «gross negigence» of driver Mr Paul and the paparazzi who had been hounding their car. It found alcohol had impaired Mr Paul`s judgement and that Diana and Dodi may have survived if they had worn seatbelts.

Many people doesn`t buy this story.

Every person who talked to Henri Paul that night has said that he did not appear intoxicated before the crash. Cameras on Ritz hotel taken only minutes before take off showed that Henri Paul was not drunken as a pig but normal.

Blood samples apparently taken from Henri Paul after the crash, showed that he was hopelessly drunk, but interestingly, the blood contained a medicine called Albendazole, which Henri`s doctor said he was never prescribed.

Even more bizarrely, the same batch of blood samples contained no trace of another medicine named Acamprostate which Henri had been prescribed. Did someone switch the blood sample?

Mr Paul`s friend Claude Garrec has attempted to defend the chauffeur. He claims Mr Paul passed an aviation medical test 72 hours before the crash and has dismissed suggestions the chauffeur was an alcoholic or suffering from depression.

«If Henri was an alcoholic and depressive how was this signed by a doctor just three days before he died? And one particularly strong memory for me was the message on a wreath at his funeral, «We are not fooled.»

Mr Paul was a pilot for 20 years and had to pass strict medical tests annually, including blood and liver tests, and I flew with Henri in his plane dozens of times, Claude Garrec said. His wife and his daughter were also with them at night and in foggy weather. They wouldn`t do that if Henri was mentally unstable.

Something is wrong.

First of all; why in the world did it take 1 hour and 45 minutes to get to the hospital?

Normally it takes only 11 minutes in rush hour. At night, when the accident happened, it would have taken only a few minutes, but they didnt drive directly to the hospital. The ambulance driver was ordered by the onboard doctor to stop and park outside Paris Natural History Museum, because Diana was in critical condition.

The ambulance driver parked there for more than 10 minutes. The hospital entrance was in plain view of the parked ambulance, but no one rushed over to help. They waited too long and Diana died.

Against all French laws, immediately a team of embalmers illegally embalmed Diana`s body, whilst it was still worm. This made any post-mortem examination extremely difficult to perform. Therefore doctors were unable to find out if there had been any tampering with her body during the ambulance journey.

All 24 road traffic cameras on the way from Rits Hotel to the tunnel was not working at the time Diana were driving there. Coincidence?

The same happened the day Michael Jackson past away. Coincidence?

His brother Jermine Jackson said all the cameras was out of function the day Michael Jackson died. He said someone is behind it, and that he want to know the truth.

Michael Jackson often said to his friends not to let him be at the hospital if he was sick. They will kill me, he said. He often said that someone was after him. The same can be said about Diana. Lawyer Michael Mansfield is suspicious after police did not react more strongly to a note Princess Diana had written in which she claimed someone was plotting to kill her. This is also what Michael Jackson said, according to his sister Latoya Jackson.

Michael Jackson said very often that his job is to help people. He was helping sick and poor people and he was taking care of many children. He was also a very good father figure. He was simply a person that everybody loved and still love. But so is it with Diana.

Diana was the patroness of charities and organisations working with the homeless, youth, drug addicts and the elderly. She was often seen visiting children afflicted with cancer or battling debilitating diseases requiring surgery. Diana was also the patron of HALO Trust, the world`s oldest and largest landmine clearance organization.

She did a lot of charity works, visiting terminally ill people over the world, leading campaigns for animal protection, AIDS awareness and against the use of inhumane weapons.

Five days after Diana`s death, Mother Teresa died. Another person with a lot of charity work. «I was to leave the convent and help the poor while living among them. It was an order,» she said.

In her words, I would care for «the hungry, the naked, the homeless, the crippled, the blind, the lepers, all those people who feel unwanted, unloved, uncared for throughout society, people that have become a burden to the society and are shunned by everyone.

Mother Teresa, known in the Catholic Church as Saint Teresa of Calcutta, had a heart attack in Rome in 1983 while she was visiting Pope John Paul II, better knows as Saint John Paul the Great by some Catholics. Mother Teresa died 5 September 1997.

Princess Diana had one big problem; Mainstream Media.

Media were stalking her 24/7/365, but so was it for Michael Jackson. They both died young but many people won`t buy the story of an accident. They both said very often that “they are going to kill me.”

Diana didn`t do it easy for her self. She found a new partner and that partner was her former bodyguard; Dody Fayed. The son of Mohammed Al-Fayed which is the owner of the Paris Ritz hotel.

Dodi Fayed was a muslim. So is it with Jermine Jackson. We know that there is a huge problem with religion in this world. We know France and Paris` attitude to muslims. And we know what have happened in Paris lately.

A year before Michaels death, there were rumours about Michaels religion. The Sun and New York Post claimed that Michael Jackson had converted to Islam, but according to British popstar Yousef Islam (Cat Stevens), he didn`t have any kind of conversation ceremony with Michael.

In November 2008, Michael Jackson’s New York lawyer, Londell McMillan rejected a British press report that Michael Jackson has become a Muslim. “That’s rubbish. It’s completely untrue,” McMillan told reporters. In other words: Fake news!

Jermine Jackson converted to Islam. Not Michael Jackson.

Diana is very different from all other women, but seems to be very similar to Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine (1864 – 1918). Elisabeth was also very beautiful and extremely popular among the people.

She was also famous in Russian society for a charitable works among poor, but in 1918, Lenin ordered the Cheka to arrest Elisabeth. A few Bolshevik (Communist party) workers took all her money and everything she had and killed her.

Her remains were removed further east and to China before being ultimately taken to Jerusalem, where she were laid to rest in the Church of Maria Magdalena.

Elisabeth was canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia in 1981, and in 1992 by the Moscow Patriarchate as New Martyr Yelizaveta Fyodorovna (Princess Elisabeth). She is one of the 10 20th-century martyrs from across the world who are depicted in statues above the Great West Door of Westminister Abbey, London, England.

Diana`s accident happened in Paris. A city since Beaumarchais and Voltaire that is often referred to as La Ville Lumière (The city of light). Both because of its leading role during the age of Enlightenment.

That has lately become a dubious honor.

Cambodias leader Pol Pot and his friends grew up under the French Colonial Empire and was not inspired by communist Stalin or Mao. They all went to school in Paris in the 1950s, and Cambodia`s Revolution, and all their ideology came from Paris. The city of light. A city were Red Khmers was born.

According to several sources, interviewed by EIR, the Paris Police Prefect (police chief), Philippe Massoni was in the tunnel, and French interior minister, Jean-Pierre Chevenement, was at the Pitie Salpetriere Hospital prior to the arrival of the ambulance carrying Princess Diana.

French media reported that, along with Massoni, other top-ranking French officials were also at the tunnel, including Patrick Rioux, chief of the Judiciary Police, and Martine Monteil, head of the Criminal Brigade.

All those officials of high-ranking French government officials placed them in charge of the so-called rescue effort.

The evidence shows that Princess Diana`s death was almost certainly the direct result of criminal negligence by these French authorities. She could have received life-saving attention earlier and probably survived.

French authorities have systematically suppressed evidence, intimidated and gagged key witnesses, badly bungled the most vital forensic test, and prevented any outside agencies, including the families of the deceased, from even raising questions about the conduct of the French officials handling the investigation.

The cumulative effort of all the falsehoods, each tracked back to French government sources, has been ruthless cover-up on the part of the French.

This case would have resulted in manslaughter prosecution of the responsible officials had the crash occurred in the United States.

The Mainstream Media were stalking Diana, better known as «Gang Stalking», which is illegal. Mainstream Media was also stalking Michael Jackson. It is a big crime. Mainstream Media`s «hate product» number one now is President Donald Trump.

A President that is fighting against the establishment which is on the left and right side and also in the mainstream media. Trump is also the President that found the word: Fake news.

In 20 years we have seen so many cover-ups and fake news about the accident i Paris. People want to know the truth, but still today, media is not telling the truth.

Lawyer Michael Mansfield said there is a good reason to suspect the Paris incident was not accidental and calls for a fresh investigation into the fatal crash.

 

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized