Jimmy Kimmel’s mocking remarks about Donald Trump’s grief after Charlie Kirk’s assassination have ignited a firestorm. But this is about more than one comedian — it’s about how freedom of speech has turned into a demand for emotional performance, and how public debate is losing sight of responsibility.
When Jimmy Kimmel joked that Donald Trump’s grief “is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” the audience laughed, but the backlash came fast and hard. Kimmel was swiftly pulled off the air, and for many, this marked a turning point.
Critics argued that his remarks were cruel, mocking genuine human grief over the murder of a public figure. Supporters defended him, claiming it was just a joke and was protected under freedom of speech.
But this controversy goes deeper than a single comment. It highlights how the concept of freedom of speech is being stretched, sometimes misused, as a shield for abuse, ridicule, and dehumanization.
Freedom of speech is not a license to abuse
I wrote an article about Freedom of speech seven years ago, and I feel that I have a responsibility to repeat myself because this is so important. This is what I wrote: “Freedom of speech is NOT a license to abuse — it is a responsibility.”
Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents. England’s Bill of Rights (1680) legally established the constitutional right of freedom of speech in Parliament, which is still in effect.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted during the French Revolution in 1789, specifically affirmed freedom of speech as an inalienable right. Article 11 states:
“The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.”
This principle is crucial. Freedom of speech was never meant to protect cruelty, slander, or targeted emotional harm. It was meant to protect debate, dissent, and the free exchange of ideas. Rights come with duties. Speech comes with consequences.
A pattern of public shaming
This is not the first time the media have been accused of demanding emotional performances and punishing anyone who doesn’t meet the script.
When Princess Diana died in 1997, Queen Elizabeth was heavily criticized by the press for not showing enough visible grief. Headlines branded her as cold and emotionless, forcing her to make a public display of mourning just to silence the criticism.
The same pattern can be seen now: If you don’t grieve the “right way,” or if someone mocks how you grieve, it becomes a public scandal. Public emotions are staged, judged, and weaponized. And comedians, who once pushed boundaries, now risk being used as tools in that system. (Is this part of the Matrix system I wrote about in my previous article?).
The line between humor and harm
Comedy has always been about testing limits. But there’s a difference between punching up and punching down, between provoking thought and ridiculing someone’s suffering.
Mocking grief is not clever social commentary. It’s cruelty. And when it becomes normalized, it contributes to a culture where empathy is seen as weakness and cruelty is seen as courage.
Freedom of speech should protect the right to speak the truth, not the right to hurt for entertainment.
A responsibility, not a weapon
This is the lesson the Kimmel controversy should teach us. Speech is powerful. It shapes societies, moves crowds, inspires revolutions, or sparks hatred.
We must remember: Freedom of speech is not just a right. It is a responsibility. Because if freedom becomes a weapon, it will eventually destroy the very societies built to protect it.
“We’re not just standing at a crossroad. We’re standing on the threshold of a new era. Those who dare to seize the future will shape it. Those who hesitate will live in the shadow of those who didn’t.”
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sent shockwaves far beyond the United States. What began as a national tragedy is rapidly becoming a global turning point. From Britain to South Korea, millions are taking to the streets — people who say they have been ignored, dismissed, and demonized for decades are now finding their voice.
And the world’s elites are paying attention.
Donald Trump, who has spoken for years about the silent majority, is now seeing those people rally in the open. They see him as their voice, and they refuse to be silenced after Kirk’s death. They march not out of hatred, but out of love — for their own countries, their people, and their futures.
Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson Call Out Britain’s Decline
In a live broadcast, Tommy Robinson spoke on stage while Elon Musk joined via satellite. Musk warned that Britain is experiencing “a slow but rapidly accelerating erosion” driven by mass uncontrolled migration and government failure.
“The government has failed in its fundamental duty to protect its own citizens, including children,” Musk said. “This has to stop. There must be massive government reform, and the people need to be in charge — not an uncaring bureaucracy.”
Robinson questioned Musk about his commitment to free speech. Musk replied that without it, “you can’t get to the truth. Democracy only works when people are free to debate.”
“A Government Against the People”
Both Musk and Robinson argued that Britain’s government no longer represents the interests of its people. “It has become a government against the people — not for the people,” Musk said.
They condemned censorship, political persecution, and the culture of fear that silences citizens. They pointed to how many on the left celebrate violence and openly cheered Kirk’s murder. “Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you,” Musk warned. “You either fight back, or you die.”
The Woke Culture Debate
Robinson also inquired about Musk’s views on the rise of “woke culture” and its impact on innovation. Musk argued that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies often reward identity over merit, which he called “super racist, super sexist, and anti-Christian.”
“We should make decisions based on talent, hard work, and integrity,” Musk said. “Not on sex, race, or religion. The woke virus is the opposite of fairness and common sense.”
Media, Migration, and Hidden Agendas
The two went on to accuse Britain’s media of covering up the crisis. “The BBC is complicit in Britain’s destruction,” Musk claimed. “You, the people, are paying for the BBC. And you’re forced to pay for your own destruction.”
They argued that mass migration is used as a political strategy — a way to import new voters to secure left-wing power. Musk called it “a strategy that will succeed if it’s not stopped.”
Technology, Censorship, and the Future
Asked whether platforms like X or AI could give power back to ordinary people, Musk warned that technology alone can’t save democracy. “It depends on the government in charge. A corrupt government will use technology to suppress the people. Britain needs a new government — and it can’t wait four years.”
He called for the dissolution of Parliament and fresh elections. “You have to fight for your future. If not, there won’t be a future,” he said.
Hope Amid Decline
Musk lamented Britain’s decline from a bold, innovative nation into one “stifled by bureaucracy” and regulation. He said leaving the EU was the right move, but Britain has “stayed on EU-style regulations and even made them worse.”
“Civilization is fragile,” Musk concluded. “If the people of Britain take charge and install a government that truly represents them, Britain can have a great future. But we must fight for it.”
“If the people of Britain take charge and ensure there’s a government that represents their interests—and not foreign interests—then Britain has a great future,” Musk said. “Many British people had lost hope,” Robinson added. “But after today’s scene, you’ve got hope again, Britain. Britain is awake!”
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
The Assassination of Charlie Kirk and Its Impact on America
Many people remember September 11, 2001 — a day that changed America forever. Now, September 10, 2025, will also be etched into history.
On that day, a sniper shot and killed Charlie Kirk in Utah. But this was not only an attack on a man — it was an attack on the very foundations of the United States: democracy, freedom of speech, and the core American values that millions cherish.
Former President Donald Trump said in a speech afterward:
“The assassin tried to silence Charlie with a bullet, but he failed. We will ensure that his voice, his message, and his legacy will live on for countless generations.”
Paradoxically, the attempt to silence Kirk has amplified his voice. His message now resonates louder than ever before.
A Pattern of Violence
This is not the first act of political violence against conservative figures. Donald Trump himself survived an assassination attempt last year. Congressman Steve Scalise was shot. A man armed with a rifle went to Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home. Rand Paul was violently attacked by a neighbor, breaking his ribs.
Even beyond politics, chaos has escalated: riots in Los Angeles, trans shooters killing children, Jewish people shot outside an embassy, and ICE agents receiving death threats so severe that they wear masks to protect their families. Elon Musk’s car was reportedly firebombed.
Social Media’s Dark Celebration
Perhaps most shocking of all were the reactions online. The Daily Mail reported on videos showing left-wing extremists openly celebrating Kirk’s death. Many said he “deserved to be shot.”
For many Americans, this response was deeply disturbing — not just because of the murder itself, but because of the apparent normalization of hate and violence on social media.
Part of a Tragic American Pattern
Kirk’s name now joins a tragic list in American history: Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X — all assassinated for standing up for their beliefs.
The FBI has stated that the ammunition used in the Kirk assassination was engraved with transgender and antifascist slogans. Utah police noted that the state still has the death penalty, and prosecutors are considering its use in this case.
A Turning Point?
Charlie Kirk was the CEO of Turning Point Action, a powerful voice for conservative youth. His death raises a haunting question:
Will this be a turning point for America — or just another chapter in a growing era of political hatred?
One thing is sure: just as 9/11 changed America, 10/11 will be a date the world will remember.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
For decades, people (including me/the editor) have been fascinated by the strange parallels between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Both were elected to Congress exactly 100 years apart, became president 100 years apart, were assassinated on a Friday, and were succeeded by men named Johnson. Their killers even share oddly similar details in their names.
At first glance, it almost feels supernatural—like history repeating itself in perfect rhythm. But is it really a mystery?
Historians point out that much of the similarity comes from selective perception. Out of the thousands of differences in their lives and presidencies, people naturally highlight the few coincidences that line up neatly. This is a classic example of confirmation bias: our brains are wired to notice patterns, even when they’re random.
Some “coincidences” are also simplified or exaggerated in retellings. For instance, John Wilkes Booth wasn’t really born in 1839 (he was born in 1838), and not every detail lines up perfectly. The myth has grown stronger as the story is passed along, making it sound more mysterious than it actually is.
So why do these parallels feel so compelling? Psychologists say it’s because humans crave meaning. We don’t like to think of history as chaotic or random; we prefer to imagine deeper connections. When two of America’s most famous presidents share some eerie overlaps, it’s easy to weave them into a narrative that feels fated.
Let`s take a closer look at all the coincidences, so we all can make up our own minds. What do you think? Is it a coincidence, and if not, what is it?
Did You Know? The Strange Coincidences Between Lincoln and Kennedy
Did you know that Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy share a series of coincidences that almost sound too incredible to be true?
Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846, while Kennedy followed exactly one century later, in 1946. Lincoln became president in 1860, and Kennedy in 1960. Both men placed civil rights at the heart of their political agendas.
The parallels don’t stop there. Both presidents were shot in the head, on a Friday, and both were succeeded by men named Johnson—Andrew Johnson (born 1808) after Lincoln, and Lyndon B. Johnson (born 1908) after Kennedy.
Even their assassins show a strange pattern. Lincoln’s killer, John Wilkes Booth, was born in 1838. Kennedy’s assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was born in 1939. Each is remembered by all three of their names—and each name contains exactly 15 letters.
The settings are equally eerie: Lincoln was shot in Ford’s Theatre, while Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car, made by Ford. Booth fled a theater and was captured in a barn. Oswald fired from a warehouse and was captured in a theater.
Coincidence? Maybe. But the uncanny parallels between Lincoln and Kennedy have fascinated historians and the public alike for decades.
If It Isn’t Coincidence: The Mystery of Lincoln and Kennedy
For over half a century, people have wondered: could the eerie parallels between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy be more than mere coincidence?
If we set aside the skeptics’ explanations of chance and pattern-seeking, a few intriguing possibilities emerge.
Some imagine history as a cycle, repeating itself in hidden rhythms. In this view, Lincoln and Kennedy weren’t just two presidents separated by a century—they were actors cast in the same recurring drama, destined to face similar trials at similar moments in America’s story.
Others lean toward mystical explanations. Perhaps the two men were linked by fate, or even reincarnation: the same soul returning to guide the nation in moments of upheaval. Civil rights, unity, and the fight against division marked both presidencies. Was Kennedy continuing a mission Lincoln began? And what about MLK, who was a Civil rights Champion? Also, he was shot.
There’s also a conspiratorial lens. If powerful forces engineered both assassinations, the similarities might not be accidents at all, but deliberate echoes—details designed to send a chilling message across generations.
And then there’s the possibility of a psychological pattern. Maybe leaders who challenge the status quo—who push too hard on civil rights and equality—are always bound to meet resistance, no matter the century. The echoes we notice could simply be the shadow of power repeating itself.
Whether it’s fate, conspiracy, or the cycles of history, one thing is sure: the Lincoln–Kennedy parallels continue to haunt us, because deep down, we sense that history is never entirely random.
The Lincoln–Kennedy Enigma
Some call it a coincidence. Others whisper of fate.
A century apart, two men rose to lead America. Both spoke of unity, of civil rights, of a brighter tomorrow. Both carried the weight of a divided nation. And both met their end in the same way—on a Friday, by a bullet to the head.
Lincoln and Kennedy. Different centuries, same story. Their successors bore the same name. Their killers mirrored each other, right down to the letters in their names. The pattern is too precise, too elegant, too cruel to dismiss as chance.
So what is it?
Is history caught in a loop, replaying itself like a record that can’t escape the groove? Are Lincoln and Kennedy two faces of the same destiny—one soul returning, unfinished business in hand? Or is it something darker? A hidden hand, weaving events to prove a point: that power never forgets, and those who challenge it will always fall in the same way.
The facts are real. The parallels are undeniable. What they mean… remains a mystery.
Maybe it’s a coincidence. Maybe it’s fate. Or maybe… It’s the shadow of history itself.
The Hidden Hand
They call it a coincidence. But in the dark corners of history, whispers tell of something else—the Hidden Hand.
The theory goes like this: whenever a leader rises to challenge the old order, to push too far, too fast, the Hidden Hand intervenes. It doesn’t wear a face. It doesn’t sign its name. It moves quietly, shifting events, nudging fate, until the outcome is sealed.
Lincoln, they say, stood in the way of a fractured nation healing on its own terms. He forced the issue—slavery, equality, the very definition of freedom. The Hand moved. Booth pulled the trigger.
A century later, Kennedy dared to dream of civil rights, peace with enemies, and a future outside the control of those who profited from conflict. Again, the Hand moved. Oswald fired from the window.
But who—or what—is the Hidden Hand?
Some say it is not a who at all, but a network: secret societies, power brokers, the guardians of wealth and order. Others believe it is older than governments, older than money—a force that ensures balance by cutting down those who rise too high.
The evidence is never written in books, never proven in courts. It lives in patterns, in eerie coincidences, in the silence that follows a gunshot.
Perhaps the Hand is real. Perhaps it is only the shape our minds give to chaos. But if it is real, one truth remains: it is still here, waiting, watching… ready to move again.
The Lincoln–Kennedy Code
Some say history is random. Some say it is written. Others… say it is programmed.
In the shadows, beyond the eyes of ordinary citizens, a code runs silently, threading events together like lines of invisible text. Lincoln and Kennedy—they were anomalies in the system. Two points of interference, two glitches in the simulation, pulling at the edges of the Matrix.
Lincoln rose to challenge the rules of his time, daring to rewrite the moral algorithm of a nation. Kennedy, a century later, attempted to push the code even further, to open pathways the system never intended. And in each case, the system corrected itself. A gunshot. A Friday. A succession meant to restore balance.
The Hidden Hand, some theorists whisper, is not human. It is the program itself, self-correcting, adjusting the loops of history to prevent the simulation from destabilizing. Every coincidence—the names, the dates, the letters in assassins’ names—was a sign of the underlying code, a signature left for those who could see.
But the anomaly persists. Those who notice the patterns, who question why history repeats with such precision… they are the exceptions. And exceptions, in the Matrix, are dangerous.
Lincoln. Kennedy. The pattern is unfinished. The code is still running. And somewhere, beyond the veil of what we call reality, the system watches, calculates… and waits.
The Simulation
What if everything we know—history, life, even death—is not real? What if reality itself is a simulation, a construct designed to test, to teach, or simply to observe?
Some patterns seem too precise to be random. Lincoln and Kennedy, separated by a century yet eerily linked by dates, names, and deaths—are they just coincidences, or are they markers in the code? Every anomaly, every “glitch” in history, could be the system correcting itself, nudging events so the simulation stays on course.
Perhaps we are all characters in a program we cannot see, playing roles assigned long before we were born. Some of us notice the glitches: the strange parallels, the déjà vu, the moments when history repeats itself with impossible precision. And those who notice… are awakened, aware that the world is not what it seems.
Lincoln. Kennedy. The patterns are clues. The simulation is still running. And somewhere, unseen, the programmer watches, shaping reality one line of code at a time.
Short summary:
Lincoln–Kennedy Coincidences
Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Lincoln became president in 1860.
Kennedy became president in 1960.
Both were strongly concerned with civil rights.
Both were shot in the head on a Friday.
Both were succeeded by a Johnson:
Andrew Johnson (born 1808), after Lincoln
Lyndon B. Johnson (born 1908), after Kennedy
Both assassins are known by their three names, each with 15 letters:
John Wilkes Booth
Lee Harvey Oswald
Lincoln was shot in Ford’s Theatre.
Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car made by Ford.
Booth fled a theater and was caught in a barn.
Oswald shot from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
President Trump marks the 100th day of his second term, a benchmark that`s widely considered the first impression of any administration.
The milestone has its roots in the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. Within months of taking office in 1933, he signed dozens of bills and executive orders that helped alleviate the nation`s financial crisis and set the New Deal in motion.
Trump has hit multiple records for his first 100 days in office, but the rapidity of his actions also highlights the fragility of relying on presidential actions to cement core politics. Trump has signed 142 executive orders since January 20. No one is near. Obama had 19 in 2009.
Trump left office in 2021 with an approval rate of 38%. Now, the approval rating sits at 42% in March. Biden, in contrast, capped off his first 100 days with an approval rating of 53%. Biden left office with an approval rating of 42%.
Speaker Mike Johnson said Trump has achieved more in 100 days than most presidents in their lifetime. Gingrich said Trump could be among the most consequential figures since the U.S. founding.
On the other side, the Democrats said Trump is failing in round two, and they still want to resist his agenda. Chuck Schumer said it`s been 100 days of hell under Trump. 100 days of hell for the American families. For the economy, and for the Democracy.
He also said that the start of Donald Trump`s second term has been the worst start of any president in modern times.
No matter what people believe, the future will judge him anyway, and money talks. The problems started a long time ago, and the problem is not Trump. He is in the Oval Office because of all the troubles.
The markets are rocky, and it will probably continue to be so for a while. A New World Order is on the way, and you cannot come through this without disruptions. Despite all this, Trump continues to do what he believes in.
One of the biggest problems is inflation. It`s low under Trump but was sky high under Biden. Inflation accelerated notably under Biden. In 2021, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) began to rise sharply, and it peaked at 9,1% in June 2022 (the highest in four decades).
Now, under Trump, the inflation is down to 2,4%, indicating that earlier pressures were easing.
But are we gonna blame Biden for this, and give Trump cred? While the most pronounced inflation occurred during Biden`s presidency, its origins are multifaceted, involving pandemic-era policies from both administrations, global supply issues, and geopolitical tensions.
Thus, attributing the inflation surge solely to one president oversimplifies a complex economic situation.
Under Trump, drug prices are down. The drop in the price was the largest ever recorded. Gasoline prices are down 7% since Trump took office. Energy prices are down 2%. Egg prices are down about 50% since Trump took office.
These price declines are in contrast to the persistently high inflation under President Biden, which reached the highest annual rate in the past 40 years. After suffering for years under the Biden Administration’s inflation, consumers are now getting welcome relief. On Biden`s watch, grocery prices rose 23%, and energy prices rose 34%.
Real average hourly earnings for middle- and low-income workers are up since Trump took office. The automotive sector is growing under Trump. Mortgage rates have declined, and Industrial production was at the seventh-highest monthly level ever recorded in March.
Since the beginning of the Trump Administration, at least $5 trillion in new investment in the U.S. has been pledged from both foreign governments and private companies.
Upon taking office, President Trump immediately blocked all unfinalized Biden-era rules, saving Americans over $180 billion – $2.100 per family of four over the next decade, and launched a bold, multi-agency effort to roll back existing federal regulations that drive up the cost of living. The combined savings from all of Trump’s actions equal just over $900 billion or nearly $11.000 per family of four over the coming decade.
President Trump has created 345,000 jobs since taking office in January. 188,000 (54%) of these were non-government and government-adjacent sectors. This is a dramatic improvement from the last two years of the Biden Administration, when three-fourths of all new jobs were in government or government-adjacent sectors.
Elon Musk also said that he would spend less time on DOGE and focus on Tesla, as the 130-day clock on his appointment as a «special government employee» runs down. «The DOGE team has made a lot of progress in addressing waste and fraud,» Musk said.
In an interview with Time, Trump called DOGE a «very big success.» «We found hundreds of billions of dollars of waste, fraud, and abuse,» he said. «It`s a scam. It`s illegal, in my opinion, so much of the stuff that we found, but I think DOGE has been a big success from that standpoint.»
As Musk steps down, DOGE`s work continues, but it`s too early to say what the long-term impact of DOGE will have on the federal government. Trump`s order gives the temporary DOGE organization a deadline of July 4, 2026, to accomplish its goals.
Musk said he will spend a day or two a week on government work. Trump is finished with the first 100 days of this second term, and will continue to work 100% for only $1. This is how he`s saving Americans. Will Trump`s revolution succeed? To be continued……
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Ket Garden
Shiny bull 