Tag Archives: Assassination

The Price of Justice, and the Power of Forgiveness

Broken people break others. Can society heal by punishing… or by forgiving? When the one who destroys is themselves destroyed — what does that say about us all?

In the wake of horrific crimes, society often faces a fundamental question:
Should justice focus solely on punishment — or is there still room for forgiveness?

The recent case of Tyler Robinson, who may face the death penalty or even execution by firing squad, has reignited this debate. Many argue that the harshest penalties are necessary to deter future crimes — that without serious consequences, there is little to lose, and therefore little reason for criminals to refrain from committing crimes. Harsh punishment, they say, is the only language that some will understand.

And yet, history gives us a radically different perspective.

(Picture: Jesus said; «Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.» – Luke 23:34, while being crucified. It represents an act of extreme mercy and forgiveness, where Jesus intercedes for the people responsible for his suffering and death, including the soldiers, religious leaders, and the crowd who mocked him).

In 1981, Pope John Paul II was shot and critically wounded by Mehmet Ali Ağca, a terrorist from Turkey. Against all expectations, the Pope survived. But what shocked the world even more was what he did later:
He visited his would-be assassin in prison, spoke with him privately, and forgave him.

John Paul’s forgiveness did not erase the crime. Ağca still had to serve many years in prison. But the Pope’s act sent a powerful message:
Forgiveness does not mean removing justice — it means choosing mercy in the midst of justice.

This raises a haunting question about Robinson’s case:
What if someone close to the victims were to forgive him?
It would not mean he walks free. It would not mean society abandons justice. But it would show that even in the face of darkness, the human heart can choose light.

At the same time, we must dare to face an uncomfortable truth:
Those who kill are often deeply broken. Healthy minds do not commit such acts.
Those who destroy are often themselves destroyed — products of trauma, neglect, and a world that failed to heal them.
In this sense, every such tragedy is not just about one person, but a mirror of the society that shaped them.

Because in any society, the dynamics of human relationships follow a simple truth:
1. Those who are treated well often become well.
2. Those who are treated badly often become bad.

So simple — and yet so profound.
We are all in the same boat.

Justice protects society.
Forgiveness heals souls.
But prevention and compassion may heal society itself.

“Forgive, and you will be forgiven.” — Jesus (Luke 6:37)

And maybe one day, we will learn:
To heal the world, we must first heal each other.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Freedom of Speech or Freedom to Offend? — The Kimmel Controversy

Jimmy Kimmel’s mocking remarks about Donald Trump’s grief after Charlie Kirk’s assassination have ignited a firestorm.
But this is about more than one comedian — it’s about how freedom of speech has turned into a demand for emotional performance, and how public debate is losing sight of responsibility.

When Jimmy Kimmel joked that Donald Trump’s grief “is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” the audience laughed, but the backlash came fast and hard. Kimmel was swiftly pulled off the air, and for many, this marked a turning point.

Critics argued that his remarks were cruel, mocking genuine human grief over the murder of a public figure. Supporters defended him, claiming it was just a joke and was protected under freedom of speech.

But this controversy goes deeper than a single comment. It highlights how the concept of freedom of speech is being stretched, sometimes misused, as a shield for abuse, ridicule, and dehumanization.

Freedom of speech is not a license to abuse

I wrote an article about Freedom of speech seven years ago, and I feel that I have a responsibility to repeat myself because this is so important. This is what I wrote:
“Freedom of speech is NOT a license to abuse — it is a responsibility.”

Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents. England’s Bill of Rights (1680) legally established the constitutional right of freedom of speech in Parliament, which is still in effect.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted during the French Revolution in 1789, specifically affirmed freedom of speech as an inalienable right. Article 11 states:

“The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.

This principle is crucial. Freedom of speech was never meant to protect cruelty, slander, or targeted emotional harm. It was meant to protect debate, dissent, and the free exchange of ideas. Rights come with duties. Speech comes with consequences.

A pattern of public shaming

This is not the first time the media have been accused of demanding emotional performances and punishing anyone who doesn’t meet the script.

When Princess Diana died in 1997, Queen Elizabeth was heavily criticized by the press for not showing enough visible grief. Headlines branded her as cold and emotionless, forcing her to make a public display of mourning just to silence the criticism.

The same pattern can be seen now:
If you don’t grieve the “right way,” or if someone mocks how you grieve, it becomes a public scandal. Public emotions are staged, judged, and weaponized. And comedians, who once pushed boundaries, now risk being used as tools in that system. (Is this part of the Matrix system I wrote about in my previous article?).

The line between humor and harm

Comedy has always been about testing limits. But there’s a difference between punching up and punching down, between provoking thought and ridiculing someone’s suffering.

Mocking grief is not clever social commentary. It’s cruelty. And when it becomes normalized, it contributes to a culture where empathy is seen as weakness and cruelty is seen as courage.

Freedom of speech should protect the right to speak the truth, not the right to hurt for entertainment.

A responsibility, not a weapon

This is the lesson the Kimmel controversy should teach us.
Speech is powerful. It shapes societies, moves crowds, inspires revolutions, or sparks hatred.

We must remember: Freedom of speech is not just a right. It is a responsibility.
Because if freedom becomes a weapon, it will eventually destroy the very societies built to protect it.

We’re not just standing at a crossroad. We’re standing on the threshold of a new era. Those who dare to seize the future will shape it. Those who hesitate will live in the shadow of those who didn’t.”

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

“Hitler is alive” is a conspiracy fact

We heard about it a few years ago but many didnt belive it. Hitler faked his own death and fled to South America. He and his wife didnt die after World War 2. He lived a peaceful life in Argentina.

What you have heard until now at school is that Hitler and his wife committed suicide whilst hiding out in a bunker at the en of World War 2. It was the end of evil terror and the case was closed. That was a big lie. We have to rewrite the history.

Nazi-Conspiracy-Adolf-Hitler-Alive-Argentina-CIA-Files-Open-Declassified-World-War-2-Reich-1121169

(Secret classified document from CIA. Phillip Citroen, a former German SS trooper, stated that Hitler is still alive)

 

Now we have some great evidence that says: Hitler faked the whole thing and was alive. Everything is revealed by the CIA and ex-CIA agent, Bob Baer. In an interview, Baer said: «The narrative the government gives us is a lie. What we are doing is reexamining history, history that we thought was settled that Hitler died in the bunker. But the deeper we get into it, its clear to me we dont have any facts for it.»

Conspiracy theorists often said Hitler was alive and that he survived World War 2, despite him officially being recorded dead by the Allies. Russian authorities also claimed Hitler was still alive.

Officially, the Red Army closed this case and said Hitler shot himself and then his body was burned by Soviet soldiers. Western-led investigations suggest the Führer is dead, despite alleged sightings recorded by the CIA and FBI.

In the JFK documents you can see declassified CIA files reveals that Hitler escaped war-torn Germany and lived a peaceful life in the beautiful foothills of the Andes Mountains. He lived in Argentina many years after World War 2.

A man called Citroen is said to have been in contact with Hitler once a month in Colombia, and the CIA documents reads: «Citroen» also stated Hitler left Colombia for Argentina around January, 1955.

So, if CIA knew that Hitler was alive, why didn`t they take him to the court? «Citroen» said that more than ten years have passed since the end of World War 2, and the allies could no longer prosecute Hitler as a criminal of war.»

It`s odd to see that Hitler is reported in the JFK documents, but it can be because of the fight against Communism. It is no doubt that Nazism and Fascism is evil but right after the end of World War 2, a new problem occurred; Communism.

Warren Commission said Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman that killed JFK, but the Zapruder film prove another thing. You can clearly see it in the Oliver Stone film called «JFK» from 1992. In other words: LBJ had a big cover up.

The magic bullet came from the front. Not from the back were Oswald was. When the shot hit Kennedy, his head goes backward and to the left, which means the bullet came from the front. Actor Kevin Costner explain this in the court in Stone`s movie. A great movie that cover this JFK case well.

In the same movie, you can also see that Oswald only days before the assassination is doing a Communist propaganda. Oswald was a self-proclaimed Marxist/Leninist since adolescence who defected to the USSR in 1959 on his own initiative, offering to trade on his military expertise with the Marines.

Oswald`s ideal of a Soviet utopia was immediately soured by bureaucratic indifference, causing Oswald to adopt revolutionary Marxism as opposed to institutionalized Leninism, perhaps inspired by som Cuban students he befriended while living in Minsk.

By the time Oswald and his Russian-born wife Marina leave the USSR in June 1962, Oswald sees in the Castro revolution a truer form of socialism – one not corrupted by Soviet Communist Party Officials and their perks.

Oswald was very active in defending Castro through debating on radio. Oswald tried to infiltrate some anti-Castro elements, perhaps to gather intelligence to impress Havana. All this effort turned out to be for nothing when Oswald was rejected at the Cuban embassy in Mexico City in early October.

Oswald was a complex person. One part of him was ant-Castro, the other part was pro-Castro. His friends like the one who murdered him, Club owner Jack Ruby, was anti-Communists and right-wing activists, closely linked to FBI, the CIA and U.S Naval Intelligance.

Many of them was strange friends like Jack Ruby, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, Guy Banister and George de Mohrenschildt. So, Oswald created a public persona for himself as a leftist agitator when he returned to the U.S.

In New Orleans, he set up his own Fair Play For Cuba Committee without the authorization of the national headquarters og the organization which was based in New York City. He was the only member of his committee. Although broke, Oswald hired two men to help him distribute his handbills.

Conspiracy theorists claim Oswald was a “patsy” because they wanted people to belive that he was pro-Russian and pro-Castro. It was just a part of the game.

Oswald had a girlfriend from Russia and spent a lot of time there. In Texas, Oswald and his family were befriended by members of a right-wing Russian emigè community.

The CIA documents is evidence and documents people have waited for in 75 years. The document is available via the CIA`s own archives site.

 

wake-up-red

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

———————————————–advertisement——————————————————-

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Polo Shirt

High quality Polo shirt with Shinybull logo. This version is made from breathable 100% cotton. Short sleeves and ribbed armbands.

$125.00

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Uncategorized

Donald J Trump will be sworn in as the 45th president of the United States

It is a pivotal day today as Donald J Trump will be sworn in as the 45 president of the United States. Trump will start his first day at the white house with the lowest approval rating in many decades.

900 000 is expecting to come to Washington and many of them will boycott Trump`s swearing-in. Over 60 members of Congress have declared they will not attend the inauguration. In addition; millions of dollars are fleeing in to different organizations to resist Trumpism.

seal_of_the_president_of_the_united_states-svg

50% voted for Donald J Trump. Are 50% of the American people stupid? What we know is that people are angry, and that is why many of them voted for Trump. Trump said in his speech last night that this is a movement.

He called CNN for «fake news». He is attacking CIA and are against the establishment. This is something that remind us about John F Kennedy. When we look at the history, we know that Donald J Trump have to be very careful. He can be assassinated.

John F Kennedy talked about the same group of people. He was referring to a shadow government, and in one of his speeches he said:

«We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tight net highly efficient machine that combines military diplomatic intelligence economic scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised».

John F Kennedy talked about the secret society which is the same group of people Donald J Trump talks about. The secret society has no traditions or any religion, and they own the media as it is today.

John F Kennedy was assassinated 22 November 1963 in Dallas, Texas, but he is not the only one. William McKinley was assassinated 14 September 1901, six month into his second term. There is something scary here. Take a good look at the scheme below.

 

President nr 25 William McKinley Assassinated

President nr 35 John F Kennedy Assassinated

President nr 45 Donald J Trump ?

 

Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth on Good friday, April 14, 1865. He was the 16th president of the United States. Lincoln was a religious skeptic, and he was a classical liberal democrat. An enemy of artificial hierarchy, a friend to trade and business as ennobling and enabling, and an American counterpart to Mill, Cobden, and Bright.

In surveys of U.S scholars ranking presidents conducted since the 1940`s, Lincoln is consistently ranked in the top three, often as number one. In presidential ranking polls conducted in the United States since 1948, Lincoln has been rated at the very top in the majority of polls.

President Lincolns assassanation increased his status to the point of making him a national martyr. Lincoln was viewed by abolitionists as a champion for human liberty. Republicans linked Lincolns name to their party, and many consider him to a man of outstanding ability. We also know John F Kennedy`s popularity, and he will never be forgotten. What about Donald J Trump? Will he fail and be forgotten?

 

trump100_b

 

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

The assassination of Julius Caesar and “the ides of March”

Today, On March 15, 44 BC, the founder of the Roman Republic and the rise of Roman Empire, Julius Caesar was assassinated and killed by members of the Roman Senate. The world`s most famous political murders.

Caesars second heir were among the assassins. There were totally as many as sixty assassins. Caesar was stabbed twenty-three times and died at the base of Pompeys statue, but the assassins made a big mistake.

They didnt know what to do after Caesars death.

 

Caesar

 

They didnt have a plan, so they mistakenly allowed Marcus Antonius (Mark Antonio), who was Caesars cousin and right-hand man, to live. Caesar`s death is a key moment in history. It all resulted in a cycle of civil wars, which resulted in one of the most significant constitutional transformations in history.

They went from a republican system of government and became an empire. Supporters of the Republic point to how it threw off the tyrannical king Tarquin the Proud and introduced elements of democracy.

It became popular also in Italy, France, Spain, Greece, Macedonia, Syria, Libya, Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia.

Julius Caesar was born 12 July 100 BCE. His father was a Praetor who governed the province of Asia and his mother was of noble birth. Both held to the popular ideology of Rome which favored democratization of government and more rights for the lower class as opposed to the optimates factions` claim of the superiority of the nobility and tradition Roman values which favored the upper classes.

It should be understood that the Optimate and the Populare were not political parties in conflict with each other but, rather, political ideologies which many people shifted toward and from, regardless of class in society.

The concept of appealing to the people for support, rather than seeking approval from the Roman Senate or the other Patricians, would work well for Caesar later in life.

 

ancient-18496_960_720

Gaius Julius Caesar was Roman statesman, general, and notable author of Latin Prose. Caesar was extremely talented in many ways which is very unusual. He was a military colossus, compelling writer, original thinker, magnetic orator, dynamic reformer and magnanimous politician.

He was also narcissistic, manipulative, egotistical, sexual predatory, shockingly savage in war even by Roman standards, and monomaniacal obsessed with acquiring absolute power for himself. Caesar is considered by many historians to be one of the greatest military commanders in history.

Thanks to William Shakespeare, «Beware the ides of March» means that people always remember March 15.

In 60 BC, Caesar, Crassus and Pompey formed a political alliance that dominated Roman politics for several years. Their attempts to amass power through populist tactics were opposed by the conservative ruling class within the Roman Senate.

Caesars victories in the Gallic Wars, completed by 51 BC, extended Romes territory to the English Channel and Rhine. Caesar became the first Roman general to cross both when he built a bridge across the Rhine and conducted the first invasion of Britain.

These achievement granted him unmatched military power and threatened to eclipse the standing of Pompey, who had realigned himself with the Senate after the death of Crassus in 53 BC. With the Gallic Wars concluded, the Senate ordered Caesar to step down from his military command and return to Rome.

Caesar refuse the order, and instead marked his defiance in 49 BC by crossing the Rubicon with a legion, leaving his province and illegally entering Roman Italy under arms. Civil war resulted, and Caesar`s victory in the war put him in an unrivaled position of power and influence.

After assuming control of government, Caesar began a programme of social and governmental reforms, including the creation of the Julian Calendar. He centralised the bureaucracy of the Republic and was eventually proclaimed «dictator in perpetuity», giving him additional authority.

 

the-forum-1160739_960_720

But underlying political conflicts had not been resolved, and on the Ides of March (15 March) 44 BC, Caesar was assassinated by a group of rebellious senators.

A new civil war broke out, and the constitutional government of the Republic was never fully restored. Caesar`s adoped heir Octavian, later known as Augustus, rose to sole power after defeating his opponents in the civil war. Octavian set about solidifying his power, and the era of the Roman Empire began.

Rome finally became an empire at the end of the 1st century BC, under Augustus and his authoritarian successors. The Roman Empire had its centre in the Mediterranean, controlling all the countries on its shores; the northern border was marked by the Rhine and Danube rivers.

The Empire reached its maximum expansion, controlling approximately 5,900,000 km2 of land surface, including Britain, Romania and parts of Mesopotamia, Pax Romana, a period of peace, civilisation and an efficient centralised government in the subject territories ended in the 3rd century, when a series of civil wars undermined Rome`s economic and social strength.

The Roman Empire had been repeatedly attacked by invading armies from Northern Europe and in 476, Rome finally fell.

British historian Edward Gibbon argued in «The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire» (1776) that the Romans had become decadent, they had lost civic virtue.

Glen W. Bowersock has remarked, «we have been obsessed with the fall: it has been valued as an archetype for every perceived decline, and, hence, as a symbol for our own fears.» It remains one of the greatest historical questions, and has a tradition rich in scholarly interest.

Over time many theories have been proposed on why the Empire fell, or whether indeed it fell at all.

I love The United States, but what I love is the Republic. Not the Empire. Some empires are planned, some are not, and empires created on purpose, such as Napoleonic France and Nazi Germany, have rarely lasted.

After World War II (1945), The United States became an empire. All Empire`s are a part of an evolution.

What`s the next step?

 

sbnews

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized