Tag Archives: Assassination

The Price of Justice, and the Power of Forgiveness

Broken people break others. Can society heal by punishing… or by forgiving? When the one who destroys is themselves destroyed — what does that say about us all?

In the wake of horrific crimes, society often faces a fundamental question:
Should justice focus solely on punishment — or is there still room for forgiveness?

The recent case of Tyler Robinson, who may face the death penalty or even execution by firing squad, has reignited this debate. Many argue that the harshest penalties are necessary to deter future crimes — that without serious consequences, there is little to lose, and therefore little reason for criminals to refrain from committing crimes. Harsh punishment, they say, is the only language that some will understand.

And yet, history gives us a radically different perspective.

(Picture: Jesus said; «Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.» – Luke 23:34, while being crucified. It represents an act of extreme mercy and forgiveness, where Jesus intercedes for the people responsible for his suffering and death, including the soldiers, religious leaders, and the crowd who mocked him).

In 1981, Pope John Paul II was shot and critically wounded by Mehmet Ali Ağca, a terrorist from Turkey. Against all expectations, the Pope survived. But what shocked the world even more was what he did later:
He visited his would-be assassin in prison, spoke with him privately, and forgave him.

John Paul’s forgiveness did not erase the crime. Ağca still had to serve many years in prison. But the Pope’s act sent a powerful message:
Forgiveness does not mean removing justice — it means choosing mercy in the midst of justice.

This raises a haunting question about Robinson’s case:
What if someone close to the victims were to forgive him?
It would not mean he walks free. It would not mean society abandons justice. But it would show that even in the face of darkness, the human heart can choose light.

At the same time, we must dare to face an uncomfortable truth:
Those who kill are often deeply broken. Healthy minds do not commit such acts.
Those who destroy are often themselves destroyed — products of trauma, neglect, and a world that failed to heal them.
In this sense, every such tragedy is not just about one person, but a mirror of the society that shaped them.

Because in any society, the dynamics of human relationships follow a simple truth:
1. Those who are treated well often become well.
2. Those who are treated badly often become bad.

So simple — and yet so profound.
We are all in the same boat.

Justice protects society.
Forgiveness heals souls.
But prevention and compassion may heal society itself.

“Forgive, and you will be forgiven.” — Jesus (Luke 6:37)

And maybe one day, we will learn:
To heal the world, we must first heal each other.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Freedom of Speech or Freedom to Offend? — The Kimmel Controversy

Jimmy Kimmel’s mocking remarks about Donald Trump’s grief after Charlie Kirk’s assassination have ignited a firestorm.
But this is about more than one comedian — it’s about how freedom of speech has turned into a demand for emotional performance, and how public debate is losing sight of responsibility.

When Jimmy Kimmel joked that Donald Trump’s grief “is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” the audience laughed, but the backlash came fast and hard. Kimmel was swiftly pulled off the air, and for many, this marked a turning point.

Critics argued that his remarks were cruel, mocking genuine human grief over the murder of a public figure. Supporters defended him, claiming it was just a joke and was protected under freedom of speech.

But this controversy goes deeper than a single comment. It highlights how the concept of freedom of speech is being stretched, sometimes misused, as a shield for abuse, ridicule, and dehumanization.

Freedom of speech is not a license to abuse

I wrote an article about Freedom of speech seven years ago, and I feel that I have a responsibility to repeat myself because this is so important. This is what I wrote:
“Freedom of speech is NOT a license to abuse — it is a responsibility.”

Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents. England’s Bill of Rights (1680) legally established the constitutional right of freedom of speech in Parliament, which is still in effect.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted during the French Revolution in 1789, specifically affirmed freedom of speech as an inalienable right. Article 11 states:

“The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law.

This principle is crucial. Freedom of speech was never meant to protect cruelty, slander, or targeted emotional harm. It was meant to protect debate, dissent, and the free exchange of ideas. Rights come with duties. Speech comes with consequences.

A pattern of public shaming

This is not the first time the media have been accused of demanding emotional performances and punishing anyone who doesn’t meet the script.

When Princess Diana died in 1997, Queen Elizabeth was heavily criticized by the press for not showing enough visible grief. Headlines branded her as cold and emotionless, forcing her to make a public display of mourning just to silence the criticism.

The same pattern can be seen now:
If you don’t grieve the “right way,” or if someone mocks how you grieve, it becomes a public scandal. Public emotions are staged, judged, and weaponized. And comedians, who once pushed boundaries, now risk being used as tools in that system. (Is this part of the Matrix system I wrote about in my previous article?).

The line between humor and harm

Comedy has always been about testing limits. But there’s a difference between punching up and punching down, between provoking thought and ridiculing someone’s suffering.

Mocking grief is not clever social commentary. It’s cruelty. And when it becomes normalized, it contributes to a culture where empathy is seen as weakness and cruelty is seen as courage.

Freedom of speech should protect the right to speak the truth, not the right to hurt for entertainment.

A responsibility, not a weapon

This is the lesson the Kimmel controversy should teach us.
Speech is powerful. It shapes societies, moves crowds, inspires revolutions, or sparks hatred.

We must remember: Freedom of speech is not just a right. It is a responsibility.
Because if freedom becomes a weapon, it will eventually destroy the very societies built to protect it.

We’re not just standing at a crossroad. We’re standing on the threshold of a new era. Those who dare to seize the future will shape it. Those who hesitate will live in the shadow of those who didn’t.”

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Britain Is Awake: How the Assassination of Charlie Kirk Sparked a Global Uprising

The assassination of Charlie Kirk has sent shockwaves far beyond the United States. What began as a national tragedy is rapidly becoming a global turning point. From Britain to South Korea, millions are taking to the streets — people who say they have been ignored, dismissed, and demonized for decades are now finding their voice.

And the world’s elites are paying attention.

Donald Trump, who has spoken for years about the silent majority, is now seeing those people rally in the open. They see him as their voice, and they refuse to be silenced after Kirk’s death. They march not out of hatred, but out of love — for their own countries, their people, and their futures.

Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson Call Out Britain’s Decline

In a live broadcast, Tommy Robinson spoke on stage while Elon Musk joined via satellite. Musk warned that Britain is experiencing “a slow but rapidly accelerating erosion” driven by mass uncontrolled migration and government failure.

“The government has failed in its fundamental duty to protect its own citizens, including children,” Musk said. “This has to stop. There must be massive government reform, and the people need to be in charge — not an uncaring bureaucracy.”

Robinson questioned Musk about his commitment to free speech. Musk replied that without it, “you can’t get to the truth. Democracy only works when people are free to debate.”

“A Government Against the People”

Both Musk and Robinson argued that Britain’s government no longer represents the interests of its people. “It has become a government against the people — not for the people,” Musk said.

They condemned censorship, political persecution, and the culture of fear that silences citizens. They pointed to how many on the left celebrate violence and openly cheered Kirk’s murder. “Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you,” Musk warned. “You either fight back, or you die.”

The Woke Culture Debate

Robinson also inquired about Musk’s views on the rise of “woke culture” and its impact on innovation. Musk argued that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies often reward identity over merit, which he called “super racist, super sexist, and anti-Christian.”

“We should make decisions based on talent, hard work, and integrity,” Musk said. “Not on sex, race, or religion. The woke virus is the opposite of fairness and common sense.”

Media, Migration, and Hidden Agendas

The two went on to accuse Britain’s media of covering up the crisis. “The BBC is complicit in Britain’s destruction,” Musk claimed. “You, the people, are paying for the BBC. And you’re forced to pay for your own destruction.”

They argued that mass migration is used as a political strategy — a way to import new voters to secure left-wing power. Musk called it “a strategy that will succeed if it’s not stopped.”

Technology, Censorship, and the Future

Asked whether platforms like X or AI could give power back to ordinary people, Musk warned that technology alone can’t save democracy. “It depends on the government in charge. A corrupt government will use technology to suppress the people. Britain needs a new government — and it can’t wait four years.”

He called for the dissolution of Parliament and fresh elections. “You have to fight for your future. If not, there won’t be a future,” he said.

Hope Amid Decline

Musk lamented Britain’s decline from a bold, innovative nation into one “stifled by bureaucracy” and regulation. He said leaving the EU was the right move, but Britain has “stayed on EU-style regulations and even made them worse.”

“Civilization is fragile,” Musk concluded. “If the people of Britain take charge and install a government that truly represents them, Britain can have a great future. But we must fight for it.”

“If the people of Britain take charge and ensure there’s a government that represents their interests—and not foreign interests—then Britain has a great future,” Musk said.
“Many British people had lost hope,” Robinson added. “But after today’s scene, you’ve got hope again, Britain. Britain is awake!”

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

From 9/11 to 10/11

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk and Its Impact on America

Many people remember September 11, 2001 — a day that changed America forever. Now, September 10, 2025, will also be etched into history.

On that day, a sniper shot and killed Charlie Kirk in Utah. But this was not only an attack on a man — it was an attack on the very foundations of the United States: democracy, freedom of speech, and the core American values that millions cherish.

Former President Donald Trump said in a speech afterward:

“The assassin tried to silence Charlie with a bullet, but he failed. We will ensure that his voice, his message, and his legacy will live on for countless generations.”

Paradoxically, the attempt to silence Kirk has amplified his voice. His message now resonates louder than ever before.

A Pattern of Violence

This is not the first act of political violence against conservative figures.
Donald Trump himself survived an assassination attempt last year. Congressman Steve Scalise was shot. A man armed with a rifle went to Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home. Rand Paul was violently attacked by a neighbor, breaking his ribs.

Even beyond politics, chaos has escalated: riots in Los Angeles, trans shooters killing children, Jewish people shot outside an embassy, and ICE agents receiving death threats so severe that they wear masks to protect their families. Elon Musk’s car was reportedly firebombed.

Social Media’s Dark Celebration

Perhaps most shocking of all were the reactions online. The Daily Mail reported on videos showing left-wing extremists openly celebrating Kirk’s death. Many said he “deserved to be shot.”

For many Americans, this response was deeply disturbing — not just because of the murder itself, but because of the apparent normalization of hate and violence on social media.

Part of a Tragic American Pattern

Kirk’s name now joins a tragic list in American history: Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X — all assassinated for standing up for their beliefs.

The FBI has stated that the ammunition used in the Kirk assassination was engraved with transgender and antifascist slogans. Utah police noted that the state still has the death penalty, and prosecutors are considering its use in this case.

A Turning Point?

Charlie Kirk was the CEO of Turning Point Action, a powerful voice for conservative youth. His death raises a haunting question:

Will this be a turning point for America — or just another chapter in a growing era of political hatred?

One thing is sure: just as 9/11 changed America, 10/11 will be a date the world will remember.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Óscar Romero: The Voice of the Voiceless

Óscar Arnulfo Romero, the Archbishop of San Salvador, became one of the most important moral voices of the 20th century. Known as “the voice of the voiceless,” he stood against injustice, poverty, and state violence in El Salvador during a time of deep political and social turmoil. His assassination in 1980 shocked the world and transformed him into a global symbol of faith, courage, and human rights.

Early Life and Church Career

Romero was born on August 15, 1917, in Ciudad Barrios, El Salvador. He entered the seminary at an early age and was ordained as a priest in 1942. For decades, Romero was regarded as a conservative and cautious church leader, prioritizing pastoral duties over politics. His appointment as Archbishop of San Salvador in 1977 was welcomed by El Salvador’s ruling elite, who saw him as someone unlikely to challenge the status quo.

Transformation and Advocacy

However, Romero’s outlook changed dramatically after witnessing the growing violence in El Salvador and the suffering of the poor. A pivotal moment came with the assassination of his close friend, Father Rutilio Grande, a Jesuit priest who worked with marginalized rural communities. From then on, Romero became an outspoken critic of human rights abuses, corruption, and the repression carried out by El Salvador’s military-backed government.

Every Sunday, Romero’s sermons were broadcast nationwide by radio. He used them to denounce violence, call for peace, and demand justice for the poor. His words inspired hope among the oppressed but provoked anger among the powerful.

Assassination

On March 24, 1980, Romero was shot and killed while celebrating Mass at a hospital chapel in San Salvador. His assassination, carried out by a death squad linked to the government, marked a turning point in El Salvador’s history. His funeral, attended by hundreds of thousands, was violently disrupted by gunfire and bombs, symbolizing the brutality of the era.

Legacy

Romero’s death did not silence his message. Instead, it amplified it worldwide. He became an enduring symbol of the struggle for justice and human dignity. His example continues to inspire human rights defenders, faith leaders, and activists worldwide.

In 2015, Pope Francis beatified Romero, declaring him a martyr. On October 14, 2018, he was canonized as a saint by the Catholic Church, officially recognized for his commitment to defending the poor and oppressed.

Conclusion

Óscar Arnulfo Romero’s life and death reflect the power of moral courage in the face of oppression. He stood alongside the marginalized when it was most dangerous to do so, and in doing so, became a beacon of hope. More than four decades after his assassination, Romero’s voice still resonates: a call for justice, peace, and unwavering solidarity with the voiceless.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Politics