EU, NATO, and PESCO: Allies or Competitors?

Some people love Trump, and some people hate him. 75 million voted for Trump and they are satisfied. Trump and his supporters believe a «golden era» is coming. But people on the other side are scared as hell. They believe that Trump will take the U.S. out of NATO. That doesn`t make sense. What in the world is going on here?

I`m sick and tired of the blame game we see. Legacy Media is blaming Trump for all the wrong things that are going on. And some people believe in it. Europe is building its own defense system, and don`t blame Trump for that.

It can be a huge problem, but it can also be great. But are we friends or foes?

EU, NATO, and PESCO

The European Union’s push to develop its own defense capabilities through initiatives like PESCO (Permanent Structured Cooperation) has sparked discussion over its future relationship with NATO and the United States. While NATO has been the backbone of European security since its founding in 1949, Europe’s focus on an independent military framework reflects a changing security landscape. Although the U.S. and EU share foundational values of freedom and peace, recent defense dynamics raise questions about the stability of this historic alliance.

NATO and the Trump Era: Increased Accountability

During his presidency, Donald Trump pressed NATO members to meet the alliance’s defense spending guideline of 2% of GDP, arguing that the U.S. bore too much of the financial burden for European security. This pressure led to significant increases in European defense budgets and served as a catalyst for Europe’s own defense initiatives. Contrary to fears of Trump wanting to leave NATO, his administration actually reinforced the alliance by pushing members to fulfill their financial commitments. As a result, Europe began preparing for a future where it could play a larger role in its own security.

The Emergence of PESCO: Europe’s Bid for Strategic Autonomy

PESCO represents the EU’s efforts to streamline its defense policies and collaborate more closely on security issues. Established in 2017, PESCO involves 25 EU member states who have agreed to invest, plan, develop, and operate defense capabilities collaboratively. The initiative seeks to address European security needs in a manner complementary to NATO, ensuring that Europe can act independently if required while supporting NATO’s broader objectives.

While some interpret PESCO as a step toward a “European army,” EU leaders have emphasized that the initiative is not intended to replace NATO but to strengthen Europe’s defense posture. The goal of “strategic autonomy” remains complex, as Europe’s leaders debate how to balance independence with their commitment to the NATO alliance.

Complex Relations Between Allies: NATO, PESCO, and the U.S.

The relationship between the EU and the U.S. is marked by shared interests but also significant challenges. Traditionally, both have aligned on security matters through NATO, yet the EU’s pursuit of PESCO hints at a desire for more independent decision-making. In scenarios where U.S. priorities shift toward the Indo-Pacific, Europe’s stronger defense mechanisms could offer the flexibility to address regional security concerns independently, such as issues in North Africa and Eastern Europe.

At the same time, a divergence in priorities, such as differing views on China or the Middle East, could test NATO’s cohesion. NATO’s structure requires a consensus, meaning that conflicting EU and U.S. agendas might hinder unified responses to global crises. Europe’s need for strategic autonomy may strengthen its regional security, but risks duplicating NATO’s efforts without close alignment, raising concerns about potential inefficiencies and gaps in defense.

Russia, Ukraine, and NATO’s Role

The Russian invasion of Ukraine underscored NATO’s role in European security. NATO’s support for Ukraine demonstrates the alliance’s commitment to European stability and its role in deterring aggression on the continent. However, NATO members have been cautious about allowing Ukraine to join as a full member due to the potential escalation with Russia. This ongoing conflict has prompted European nations to reconsider their dependence on U.S. security support, highlighting the importance of a robust European defense capability within PESCO while maintaining NATO’s strategic unity.

Challenges and Opportunities for NATO and EU Cooperation

In an ideal scenario, NATO and PESCO would complement each other, with Europe taking on more regional security responsibilities to balance the alliance. A stronger European defense framework could allow the U.S. to address global priorities while ensuring Europe’s security. However, if cooperation between the EU and NATO falters, their overlapping efforts could result in competition rather than synergy, impacting collective peace and stability.

The rise of cyber threats, climate change, and global health crises underscores the need for close transatlantic coordination. NATO’s historical role has been to unify Western democracies under a shared vision of freedom and peace. As the EU strengthens its defense mechanisms, NATO’s role may evolve, necessitating a recalibrated approach that respects Europe’s pursuit of autonomy while preserving shared security interests.

Conclusion: A Balanced Path Forward

The EU’s defense initiatives through PESCO represent a logical evolution in Europe’s security landscape, reflecting both its commitment to NATO and its desire for greater self-reliance. This development could reinforce NATO by sharing the security burden more equitably. However, maintaining cohesion and avoiding unnecessary duplication is essential. The EU and the U.S. must prioritize open dialogue and collaboration to ensure that NATO and PESCO complement each other, creating a resilient security framework for the modern world.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Trump Proposes 12-Month “Great American State Fair” Celebration for U.S. 250th Anniversary

Get ready to party folks! Donald Trump is planning to celebrate, and it`s not going to be a short one. It will be a 12-month celebration. The United States of America was born in 1776, and in 2026, the United States of America will be 250 years old.

Donald Trump is a big thinker, and his idea to ensure American greatness is to throw the United States of America «the most spectacular» birthday bash – one that will last all year. Wow!

«We want to make it the best of all time,» Trump said.

This is in line with what we see in the world today. To those who try to steal America. Trump said that «the United States will celebrate the 250th anniversary of our founding – 250 years since the day we declared our independence.»

Trump also created a 1776 Commission while in the White House to «better enable a rising generation to understand the history and principles of the founding of the United States in 1776.»

This event would commemorate the United States’ quarter-millennium since its founding, and Trump envisions it as a grand patriotic occasion, complete with state pavilions, cultural showcases, and sports competitions.

The Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, famous for its historic fairs, would serve as the main event location. Trump’s plan would likely extend across other venues as well, with each state represented by themed pavilions and attractions, celebrating their unique cultures, histories, and achievements.

The event would also feature a “National Garden of American Heroes,” a concept Trump has supported before, displaying statues of prominent American figures like Amelia Earhart, Frederick Douglass, and other historical icons.

High school athletes from across the nation would also have the chance to compete, with the aim of fostering camaraderie, national pride, and sportsmanship.

It will be A Celebration of American Identity

This celebration would bring Americans together to honor their shared history and heritage in a format similar to a World’s Fair, with a unique American twist. The fair would kick off on Memorial Day in 2025, building up to the U.S. Semiquincentennial (250th anniversary) on July 4, 2026.

Trump expressed his belief that this would both celebrate the past and inspire future generations by showcasing the spirit and resilience of the American people.

If Trump’s vision comes to fruition, “The Great American State Fair” will be the longest, most ambitious celebration of the country’s independence to date, drawing Americans from all walks of life and presenting a united front to the world as the country reaches this historic milestone.

In a plan to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary, Donald Trump has proposed creating a task force that would coordinate with state and local governments from day one of his presidency to organize a year-long series of national festivities.

Beginning on Memorial Day 2025 and culminating on July 4, 2026, the event would not just be a single-day affair but an extended celebration of American history, culture, and unity across the entire country.

Trump envisions this “Great American State Fair” as an inclusive event featuring various celebrations, exhibits, and competitions, with each state highlighting its unique culture and achievements. His proposal aligns with a larger goal of fostering a renewed sense of patriotism and national pride leading up to the 250th anniversary.

If enacted, this would mark one of the longest, most comprehensive celebrations in U.S. history, potentially shaping how the milestone is commemorated across the nation.

It`s unbelievable what this historical president can do to his own people. Historical event made by a historical president.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Donald J. Trump and Capitalism won BIG

Donald J. Trump is the next U.S. President. However, the election has significant historical elements, given the polarization and the unique political landscape surrounding both candidates. This election marks the first time a former U.S. President has won a non-consecutive second term since Grover Cleveland in 1892.

This is also the first time since 2004 that a Republican has won the popular vote. The GOP nominee`s stunning political comeback came with a high margin of victory. Not only that. At 78, Trump will also become the oldest person elected to the country`s highest office.

The intense division and high voter turnout are also notable, showing a heightened level of public engagement. 63 million voted for Trump in 2016, but this time, as of writing, more than 70 million voted for him.

Trump won more votes in nearly all of the country, and he got support from Hispanic voters, black voters, working-class heroes, and a lot of young people. This is in line with what we also see in Europe. Young voters reject the leftist policy.

Picture: Fighter Donald Trump won big over Kamala Harris, Fight, fight, fight!

On Wednesday, Kamala Harris gave a speech, and she said that many people in the U.S. feel like the U.S. is entering a dark time. I hope that is not the case, Harris said. The media is also telling us that everything is dark now. Young people want to move to another country, legacy media is telling us.

But, wait a minute. What in the world is going on here? People on the left side, including legacy media are negative and live in darkness. It seems like they don`t believe in the future. But what about the next president? He cannot be in the same camp. Can he? No way.

Trump claimed victory at around 2.30 a.m., pledging to usher in a «golden age» for the United States of America, and «Make America Great Again.» (keep in mind that the stock market and the crypto market went straight up on Wednesday. Investors love Trump! A big win for capitalism).

Not only that. Furthermore, Trump said: «This is a movement like nobody`s ever seen before and, frankly, this was, I believe, the greatest political movement of all time. There`s never been anything like this in the history.»

We must remember that millions of people have rejected the leftists, and there must be a reason for that. This is not only happening in the U.S. but also in Europe. Elon Musk is one of them. He used to be on the left side politically, but now, he is a Republican. And he is not alone.

What makes me so angry is all the BS we hear from the leftists and the legacy media. Let`s take a look at Kamala`s speech today. For example, she said:

«A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election, we accept the results. That principle, as much as any other, distinguishes democracy from monarchy or tyranny. And anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it.»

Let me remind you all of something nobody is talking about anymore. The Russia collusion. When Donald J. Trump won the election in 2016, the leftists, and the legacy media, claimed Trump and his campaign might have coordinated with Russian efforts to interfere in the U.S. election.

While several individuals associated with Trump`s campaign were investigated for potential ties to Russian operatives, Mueller`s final report did NOT establish sufficient evidence that the Trump campaign knowingly coordinated with Russian interference efforts.

The report did, however, detail numerous contacts between Trump campaign officials and Russian nationals, which raised ethical and legal concerns.

The investigation remains a significant and divisive topic, as its findings impacted U.S. political dynamics, the public’s trust in institutions, and discussions around election security.

We can all see how the leftists and the legacy media are hiding this. They started it all in 2016, and it has had a huge impact on voters. People on the left side are destroying their own party. And this is exactly what we all face now. The Democrats have lost credibility, and need to work hard to come back on track again. Voters can see it, and they are NOT stupid.

On top of that. Many people on the left and certain political figures claimed that Donald J. Trump`s victory in the 2016 election was illegitimate. Can you believe that?

These claims were based primarily on the interference of Russia in the 2016 election, as detailed in the Mueller Report, and the fact that Trump won the Electoral College while losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes.

But it doesn`t stop here. We can all see how many people on the left side always attack people on the right side. Right after the U.S. election in 2016, the leftists started a campaign called

#NotMyPresident.

Following the election, many of Trump`s opponents used the hashtag #NotMyPresident, especially among liberal and left-wing groups, to express their rejection of his presidency, arguing that he did not win the election fairly.

But this, time Donald J. Trump won BIG! And that makes it difficult to deny the results. Therefore, Kamala Harris said in the speech on Wednesday: «Now, I know folks are feeling and experiencing a range of emotions right now. I get it. But we must accept the results of this election».

Yes, Kamala Harris. That`s right. More than 70 million voted for Trump and they aren`t stupid.

Let me finish this article by telling you what a democracy is:

Democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people, who rule either directly or through freely elected representatives. The core principle is that citizens have the right to participate in decision-making, typically through voting in elections, ensuring that the government reflects the will of the people.

The U.S. is often categorized as a democracy, but the United States is more often accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic. So, the United States is often described as both a democracy and a constitutional federal republic.

The U.S. is a federal republic, which means that it is made up of states that share sovereignty with a central government. The Constitution serves as the foundational legal framework that defines the structure of the government and the rights of the people.

The «Constitutional» part signifies the importance of these legal documents in limiting governmental power and protecting individual rights.

In essence, while the U.S. is a democracy in the sense that people vote and have a role in governance, it is also a constitutional federal republic because of the distribution of power between federal and state governments, and the rule of law established by the Constitution.

Finally, Abraham Lincoln said a democracy is «of the people, by the people, for the people.» The word democracy comes from the Greek words «demos,» meaning people, and «Kratos,» meaning power. So, democracy can be thought of as «the power of the people.»

It is a way of governing that depends on the will of the people. More than 70 million voted for Trump, and this is how a democracy works—it is the will of the people. Congratulations!

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Dr. Phil is standing up for Trump supporters and talks about bullying

You all know that Legacy Media attacked Donald Trump, and continue to do it. But what the Legacy Media and all other people on the left side actually have done is completely wrong. And if you don`t react to the bad things they have done, you have to look at yourself in the mirror.

I`m serious folks. I`m not a doctor or a psychiatrist, but what we have witnessed is bullying. And that has become a really big problem in the West. Yes, not only in America but in the West. If you don`t like the bullying and want to change it, you must look at yourself in the mirror.

And if you want to change the world, you need to start with yourself, because it all starts within. That`s how easy this is.

Dr. Phil knows this much better than me because he has studied people for about 45 years. And he knows what he is talking about. But is he speaking up? Oh, yes he is. He gave a speech in Madison Square Garden a few days ago, and he talked about bullying.

Dr. Phil doesn`t like or agree with everything that Donald Trump does or says. Nor do I. Who does that? But Dr. Phil didn`t stand up for Trump. «Lord knows he doesn`t need me to stand up for him,» he said in the speech.

Just take a look at what the rude mob has done to Trump. «He`s tough as an old army boot. He`s got lots of enemies, different groups that are scared, and between them, they have impeached him, indicted him, raided him, railroaded him, shot him, and sued him. And where is he?

He is still standing. He just keeps on coming because he loves this country too, Dr. Phil said.

Dr. Phil had a speech at a Trump rally because he was standing up for the people who have declared their support for Donald Trump, or they got found out, or they want to do it but they`re too intimidated.

Intimidated? Yes, because you all know what happens when somebody in this country says, hey, I`m going to vote Republican, I`m going to vote Donald J. Trump?

As Dr. Phil said, they get canceled, intimidated, marginalized, excluded or even fired or boycotted. And you know what that means? In short, that adds up to being bullied!

And here comes the best part. Dr. Phil said, «Now we`re talking about something I know a hell lot about. Now you`re in my wheelhouse, buddy. I may not be an expert in politics, but I am an expert about bullying!»

Bullying is when you seek to harm somebody, you seek to intimidate, coerce, cause distress, fear, or risk to their well-being, and it can be physical, verbal, relational, or cyberbullying.

And it`s always wrong when you bully somebody. And that`s what`s going on.»

«Now, let me tell you what the critics are going to say when they hear me talking about this. They’re going to say, well, now wait a minute, come on. Isn’t Trump a bully? And let me tell you why the answer to that question is no.

Because to be a bully, there has to be an imbalance of power. And when there’s not, it’s just called a debate.

And he’s just better at it than anybody else. It’s called debating. It’s called arguing. It’s just – even name-calling. But it’s not bullying unless there’s an imbalance of power. And whoever he talks to, they’ve got a microphone, they got on their big-boy pants, they got a stage, they got everything else. He’s just better at it,» Dr. Phil added.

«And the same thing is true. When the Democrats or Harris call him fascist, Hitler, racist, misogynist, or a crook, is that bullying? Well, not really. It’s ugly. But with the First Amendment, which we all want to keep, there’s no imbalance of power, so it’s not bullying.

It’s just like when he does. It may not be the best use of energy, but when you attack civilians, when you attack a citizen and you use the power of the internet, you use mob mentality, you incite people to gang up and cause boycotts, then it’s beyond ugly.

And that’s what’s happening in this country right now, and that’s not OK. There is an imbalance of power there, and it’s time that every one of us close ranks. We have to stop this now,» Dr. Phil said in the speech.

And Dr.Phil is right. But this is not only a problem in the U.S.; we see it all over the West. Like I said earlier in this article, it all starts within. Take a look at yourself in the mirror.

Legacy Media is the worst bully machine we have in this society, and it`s disgusting to see how they have treated Trump for years. Absolutely disgusting. We also have to remember what Karma is. If you bully someone, the shit will sooner or later come back to you.

What comes around, goes around!

I don`t care much about politics and politicians, but I really care about bullying. Take action now. Look in the mirror, and change the world. Start today!

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

The end of South Korea`s economic miracle

The Korean Peninsula was inhabited as early as the Lower Paleolithic period. Its first kingdom was noted in Chinese records in the early 7th century BCE. The succeeding Korean Empire (1897 – 1910) was annexed in 1910 into the Empire of Japan.

Japanese rule ended following Japan`s surrender in World War II, after which Korea was divided into two zones: a northern zone, which was occupied by the Soviet Union, and a southern zone, which was occupied by the United States.

After negotiations on reunification failed, the southern zone became the Republic of Korea in August 1948, while the northern zone became the communist Democratic People`s Republic of Korea the following month.

In 1950, a North Korean invasion began the Korean War, which ended in 1953 after extensive fighting involving the American-led United Nations Command and the People`s Volunteer Army from China with Soviet assistance.

The war left 3 million Koreans dead and the economy in ruins.

The May 16 coup of 1961 led by Park Chung Hee put an end to the Second Republic, signaling the start of the Third Republic in 1963.

South Korea`s devastated economy began to soar under Park`s leadership, recording one of the fastest rises in average GDP per capita.

Despite lacking natural resources, the nation rapidly developed to become one of the Four Asian Tigers based on international trade and economic globalization, integrating itself within the world economy with export-oriented industrialization.

The Fourth Republic was established after the October Restoration of 1972, in which Park wielded absolute power.

The Yushin Constitution declared that the president could suspend basic human rights, and appoint a third of the parliament.

Suppression of the opposition and human rights abuse by the government became more severe in this period

South Korea has since then had a huge economic success. They have big companies like Samsung (which is the biggest company in South Korea), LG Energy Solution, Hyundai, and Kia to name a few.

On top of that, they also have BTS which is a boyband from South Korea. According to the Hyundai Research Institute, BTS was estimated to generate around $3,6 billion annually for the South Korean economy.

In some years, their direct and indirect contribution has been as high as $4,6 billion, which is comparable to major multinational corporations. BTS has been estimated to contribute around 0,3% to 0,5% of South Korea`s GDP in recent years.

This is a remarkable figure for a single music group, considering the country`s GDP was around $1,63 trillion in 2020.

South Korea`s economic success is well known all around the world, and they has become an economic powerhouse. But right now, it seems like their economic model is running out of steam. The economy has been slowing for years. It has basically stopped.

The economy in South Korea is on the way to be like Japan. What in the world is going on?

It all started in the 1950`s. Their economic growth was 10%, and it reached the top in the 1980`s. Then it began to slow. Growth in the 90`s declined to around 7%. Ten years later, the growth went down to 4%. In 2010, their growth was only 3%.

But something has happened in the last five years. The growth has been slowing year by year. This is what’s happening with the economy as they get richer. It happens in all rich countries. But, in South Korea, it seems like this is not temporary. It seems to be a new normal.

Bank of Kora (BOK) has warned that South Korea`s economy may enter negative territory in the next decade. The country is on a declining trajectory. Unless this is going to change, the next generation will be worse off than their parents.

But, how is it possible that a successful country like South Korea with so many high-tech companies can decline like this? Well, it has its own explanation. We need to look at their economic model, and how it came to be, and how it operates today.

The core of the South Korean economy is made up of something called «Chaebols». «Chae» stands for wealth or property, while «Bol» stands for clan or group.

«Chaebols» refers to large, family-owned business conglomerates in South Korea that wield significant influence over the country`s economy.

The influence of chaebols is often cited as a contributing factor to some of South Korea`s economic challenges, but they are not the sole reason for any economic decline. Several factors, including chaebols’ dominance, are at play when examining South Korea`s economic issues.

This is what we see in the U.S., but also in many other places in the West. They blame big corporations, wealthy entrepreneurs, and investors.

It is the concentration of economic power. Chaebols control a large portion of South Korea`s economy, leading to less competition. Their dominance can stifle small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), limiting innovation and growth in other sectors.

Chaebols have also been involved in corruption scandals, often using their power to influence political decisions. This has led to inefficiency in governance and public discontent, undermining economic reforms.

Over-reliance on Export-driven Growth is also considered to be a challenge. Chaebols are heavily focused on industries like electronics, shipbuilding, and automobiles, which are export-driven. This makes the South Korean economy vulnerable to global economic shifts and trade disputes, especially in a world where the diversification of industries is increasingly important.

They also face succession and corporate governance issues. Since chaebols are family-controlled, they often face challenges with leadership transitions between generations. This can lead to inefficiencies and financial mismanagement within these conglomerates.

Strong and independent entrepreneurs have made the wealth you and I have today. They have created products that made our lives better, and their companies have grown to be multi-billion corporations. If this is a problem for countries around the world, well, what can we say? If so, this is not the only reason why the growth is slowing.

We see the same going on in South Korea as well as in Japan and many other places. Broader factors are leading to economic challenges, and one of them is the aging population. South Korea has one of the lowest birth rates in the world, leading to a shrinking working-age population.

This demographic challenge puts pressure on economic growth and social welfare systems. This is not only happening in Japan and South Korea. It`s happening in many other places around the world.

We also have a global economic slowdown. South Korea`s heavy reliance on exports means it is susceptible to the global economic downturn. Trade tensions, especially between the U.S., and China, impact South Korea`s major industries.

On top of all that, we have technological disruption. Even though chaebols have driven much of South Korea`s technological advancements, their scale makes them slow to adapt to new digital trends and innovations compared to more agile startups.

So, what is South Korea doing to address these issues? The South Korean government has been working to implement reforms aimed at reducing chaebols’ influence, promoting transparency, encouraging innovation, and supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

While chaebols have contributed significantly to South Korea`s rapid industrialization and growth, their outsized role can create imbalances in the economy, making reforms crucial for long-term, sustainable growth.

In conclusion, while chaebols are not the sole cause of South Korea`s economic challenges, their dominance and related issues do play a role in creating an environment that can hinder broader economic diversification and reform. As we can clearly see, successful entrepreneurs and large corporations can be both beneficial and problematic for an economy.

Unfortunately, we very often see that successful entrepreneurs are attacked. Especially by socialists. But we have to ask ourselves what we should do without them? Because they are the ones that are creating wealth in the long run. No socialism without capitalism. The socialists need money for the welfare system, and that money comes from entrepreneurs who make goods and services.

Entrepreneurs drive innovation, create new industries, and develop new technologies that can improve productivity. Successful businesses, especially startups, can grow into larger companies, and boost economic growth.

Large corporations provide millions of jobs and stimulate related industries (e.g., supply chains, and service providers). For example, companies like Apple Amazon, or South Korea`s Samsung employ a large global workforce and indirectly create additional jobs in the ecosystem surrounding their businesses.

We can see time and time again, that entrepreneurs are often the source of disruptive innovation, bringing new products and services to the market. Successful entrepreneurs can help transform entire industries.

Large corporations often have the resources to invest in research and development (R&D), leading to technological advancements. For example, tech giants like Google and Microsoft invest heavily in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and other areas that push technological boundaries.

Multinational corporations make a country more competitive on the global stage. For example, South Korea`s chaebols (Samsung, Hyundai) or the U.S. tech giants, like Google and Apple, enhance their countries’ global influence. They also attract foreign investment and contribute to the trade balance through exports.

Successful entrepreneurs and large corporations are not inherently bad for the economy. In fact, they can drive growth, innovation, and global competitiveness. However, their dominance can lead to economic and social imbalances that harm the broader population if left unchecked. Balancing their power with fair regulations, competition, and equitable policies can be essential for sustainable economic development.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics