Category Archives: Uncategorized

Human Rights Advocates and the Risks They Face – From Jesus to Modern Times

Throughout history, a clear pattern emerges: those who stand up for justice, freedom, and human dignity often become targets of violence or repression. From religious leaders to political activists, many have paid the ultimate price—or suffered imprisonment—for their message.

Lincoln was shot because he was working on human rights. John F. Kennedy was shot because he was working on human rights. Martin Luther King Jr was shot because he was working on human rights. Olof Palme was shot because he was working on human rights. Lincoln was shot at a theater. So was Olof Palme.

Jesus – The First Great Human Rights Advocate?

Jesus of Nazareth, who lived over 2,000 years ago, can be seen as one of the earliest and most significant champions of human dignity. He taught love, forgiveness, and equality, consistently placing the marginalized and oppressed at the center of his message.

His teachings challenged both religious authorities and the political powers of his time, symbolizing a new understanding of justice and humanity. As a result, he was perceived as a threat—not only to religious leaders but also to the Roman authorities. His fate, crucifixion, demonstrates how power often reacts violently to those who challenge it.

Lincoln, Kennedy, MLK, Gandhi, Palme, Thrane, and Other Advocates

History echoes itself in remarkable ways:

  • Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery in the United States. He was assassinated in 1865 by John Wilkes Booth, who viewed him as a threat to the Southern states.
  • John F. Kennedy, U.S. President and advocate for civil rights, was shot in 1963.
  • Martin Luther King Jr. led the fight for African American rights and was assassinated in 1968.
  • Robert F. Kennedy was killed during the 1968 presidential campaign; he, too, championed equality and justice.
  • Mahatma Gandhi fought for India’s independence and nonviolent resistance, and was assassinated by a Hindu extremist in 1948.
  • Óscar Romero, Archbishop of El Salvador, was murdered in 1980 for defending the poor and oppressed.
  • Olof Palme, Prime Minister of Sweden, was assassinated in 1986 for his outspoken support for human rights, both domestically and internationally. Palme advocated for social welfare, equality, and global justice, and spoke out against oppression worldwide.
  • Marcus Thrane, Norway (1817–1890), was a pioneering labor and social reform leader. He fought for workers’ rights, universal male suffrage, and social equality. Though not assassinated, Thrane was imprisoned for challenging authorities, showing that human rights advocacy often provokes severe repression.

Why These Individuals Were Seen as Threats

Human rights advocates challenge power structures:

  • They question privilege and the status quo.
  • They mobilize people and give a voice to the oppressed.
  • They become symbols—living icons of hope and change.

Extremists or authorities who respond with violence or repression may include:

  • Political extremists who aim to maintain unjust systems.
  • Religious extremists who feel threatened by their beliefs or traditions.
  • Authoritarian regimes are unwilling to tolerate criticism or popular mobilization.

A Timeline of Human Rights Advocates Who Faced Assassination or Repression

YearNameRole / ContributionCircumstances
~30 ADJesus of NazarethAdvocated love, equality, and justiceCrucified in Jerusalem; seen as a threat by religious and political powers
1851Marcus ThraneNorwegian labor and social reformerImprisoned for activism and challenging authorities
1865Abraham LincolnU.S. President; abolished slaveryAssassinated by John Wilkes Booth
1948Mahatma GandhiIndian independence leader; nonviolent resistanceAssassinated by Hindu extremist Nathuram Godse
1963John F. KennedyU.S. President; civil rights supporterAssassinated in Dallas
1965Malcolm XAfrican-American civil rights leaderAssassinated by political/religious extremists
1968Martin Luther King Jr.Civil rights leader; racial equalityAssassinated by James Earl Ray
1968Robert F. KennedyU.S. Senator; civil rights advocateAssassinated by Sirhan Sirhan
1980Óscar RomeroArchbishop; defender of the poorMurdered by military-backed death squad
1986Olof PalmePrime Minister of Sweden; human rights and global justiceAssassinated in Stockholm while walking home

A Pattern Through History

From Jesus to MLK, Gandhi, Palme, and Thrane, a consistent thread is evident: those who dare to fight for human rights place themselves at risk. Assassinations and imprisonments of such individuals are not random; they represent a perceived threat to power and control.

Yet, their deaths or repression often amplify their influence rather than end it. They become symbols inspiring millions, showing that the fight for justice continues even after the heroes are gone.

Conclusion

History teaches us that standing up for justice can be dangerous, but also essential. From the crucifixion of Jesus to modern human rights defenders like Olof Palme and reformers like Marcus Thrane, we see how power and oppression react to threats and how individuals can transform the world through courage and conviction.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Politics, Uncategorized

Lincoln and Kennedy: Coincidence or Something More?

For decades, people (including me/the editor) have been fascinated by the strange parallels between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Both were elected to Congress exactly 100 years apart, became president 100 years apart, were assassinated on a Friday, and were succeeded by men named Johnson. Their killers even share oddly similar details in their names.

At first glance, it almost feels supernatural—like history repeating itself in perfect rhythm. But is it really a mystery?

Historians point out that much of the similarity comes from selective perception. Out of the thousands of differences in their lives and presidencies, people naturally highlight the few coincidences that line up neatly. This is a classic example of confirmation bias: our brains are wired to notice patterns, even when they’re random.

Some “coincidences” are also simplified or exaggerated in retellings. For instance, John Wilkes Booth wasn’t really born in 1839 (he was born in 1838), and not every detail lines up perfectly. The myth has grown stronger as the story is passed along, making it sound more mysterious than it actually is.

So why do these parallels feel so compelling? Psychologists say it’s because humans crave meaning. We don’t like to think of history as chaotic or random; we prefer to imagine deeper connections. When two of America’s most famous presidents share some eerie overlaps, it’s easy to weave them into a narrative that feels fated.

Let`s take a closer look at all the coincidences, so we all can make up our own minds. What do you think? Is it a coincidence, and if not, what is it?

Did You Know? The Strange Coincidences Between Lincoln and Kennedy

Did you know that Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy share a series of coincidences that almost sound too incredible to be true?

Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846, while Kennedy followed exactly one century later, in 1946. Lincoln became president in 1860, and Kennedy in 1960. Both men placed civil rights at the heart of their political agendas.

The parallels don’t stop there. Both presidents were shot in the head, on a Friday, and both were succeeded by men named Johnson—Andrew Johnson (born 1808) after Lincoln, and Lyndon B. Johnson (born 1908) after Kennedy.

Even their assassins show a strange pattern. Lincoln’s killer, John Wilkes Booth, was born in 1838. Kennedy’s assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was born in 1939. Each is remembered by all three of their names—and each name contains exactly 15 letters.

The settings are equally eerie: Lincoln was shot in Ford’s Theatre, while Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car, made by Ford. Booth fled a theater and was captured in a barn. Oswald fired from a warehouse and was captured in a theater.

Coincidence? Maybe. But the uncanny parallels between Lincoln and Kennedy have fascinated historians and the public alike for decades.

If It Isn’t Coincidence: The Mystery of Lincoln and Kennedy

For over half a century, people have wondered: could the eerie parallels between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy be more than mere coincidence?

If we set aside the skeptics’ explanations of chance and pattern-seeking, a few intriguing possibilities emerge.

Some imagine history as a cycle, repeating itself in hidden rhythms. In this view, Lincoln and Kennedy weren’t just two presidents separated by a century—they were actors cast in the same recurring drama, destined to face similar trials at similar moments in America’s story.

Others lean toward mystical explanations. Perhaps the two men were linked by fate, or even reincarnation: the same soul returning to guide the nation in moments of upheaval. Civil rights, unity, and the fight against division marked both presidencies. Was Kennedy continuing a mission Lincoln began? And what about MLK, who was a Civil rights Champion? Also, he was shot.

There’s also a conspiratorial lens. If powerful forces engineered both assassinations, the similarities might not be accidents at all, but deliberate echoes—details designed to send a chilling message across generations.

And then there’s the possibility of a psychological pattern. Maybe leaders who challenge the status quo—who push too hard on civil rights and equality—are always bound to meet resistance, no matter the century. The echoes we notice could simply be the shadow of power repeating itself.

Whether it’s fate, conspiracy, or the cycles of history, one thing is sure: the Lincoln–Kennedy parallels continue to haunt us, because deep down, we sense that history is never entirely random.

The Lincoln–Kennedy Enigma

Some call it a coincidence. Others whisper of fate.

A century apart, two men rose to lead America. Both spoke of unity, of civil rights, of a brighter tomorrow. Both carried the weight of a divided nation. And both met their end in the same way—on a Friday, by a bullet to the head.

Lincoln and Kennedy. Different centuries, same story. Their successors bore the same name. Their killers mirrored each other, right down to the letters in their names. The pattern is too precise, too elegant, too cruel to dismiss as chance.

So what is it?

Is history caught in a loop, replaying itself like a record that can’t escape the groove? Are Lincoln and Kennedy two faces of the same destiny—one soul returning, unfinished business in hand? Or is it something darker? A hidden hand, weaving events to prove a point: that power never forgets, and those who challenge it will always fall in the same way.

The facts are real. The parallels are undeniable. What they mean… remains a mystery.

Maybe it’s a coincidence.
Maybe it’s fate.
Or maybe… It’s the shadow of history itself.

The Hidden Hand

They call it a coincidence. But in the dark corners of history, whispers tell of something else—the Hidden Hand.

The theory goes like this: whenever a leader rises to challenge the old order, to push too far, too fast, the Hidden Hand intervenes. It doesn’t wear a face. It doesn’t sign its name. It moves quietly, shifting events, nudging fate, until the outcome is sealed.

Lincoln, they say, stood in the way of a fractured nation healing on its own terms. He forced the issue—slavery, equality, the very definition of freedom. The Hand moved. Booth pulled the trigger.

A century later, Kennedy dared to dream of civil rights, peace with enemies, and a future outside the control of those who profited from conflict. Again, the Hand moved. Oswald fired from the window.

But who—or what—is the Hidden Hand?

Some say it is not a who at all, but a network: secret societies, power brokers, the guardians of wealth and order. Others believe it is older than governments, older than money—a force that ensures balance by cutting down those who rise too high.

The evidence is never written in books, never proven in courts. It lives in patterns, in eerie coincidences, in the silence that follows a gunshot.

Perhaps the Hand is real. Perhaps it is only the shape our minds give to chaos. But if it is real, one truth remains: it is still here, waiting, watching… ready to move again.

The Lincoln–Kennedy Code

Some say history is random. Some say it is written. Others… say it is programmed.

In the shadows, beyond the eyes of ordinary citizens, a code runs silently, threading events together like lines of invisible text. Lincoln and Kennedy—they were anomalies in the system. Two points of interference, two glitches in the simulation, pulling at the edges of the Matrix.

Lincoln rose to challenge the rules of his time, daring to rewrite the moral algorithm of a nation. Kennedy, a century later, attempted to push the code even further, to open pathways the system never intended. And in each case, the system corrected itself. A gunshot. A Friday. A succession meant to restore balance.

The Hidden Hand, some theorists whisper, is not human. It is the program itself, self-correcting, adjusting the loops of history to prevent the simulation from destabilizing. Every coincidence—the names, the dates, the letters in assassins’ names—was a sign of the underlying code, a signature left for those who could see.

But the anomaly persists. Those who notice the patterns, who question why history repeats with such precision… they are the exceptions. And exceptions, in the Matrix, are dangerous.

Lincoln. Kennedy. The pattern is unfinished. The code is still running. And somewhere, beyond the veil of what we call reality, the system watches, calculates… and waits.

The Simulation

What if everything we know—history, life, even death—is not real? What if reality itself is a simulation, a construct designed to test, to teach, or simply to observe?

Some patterns seem too precise to be random. Lincoln and Kennedy, separated by a century yet eerily linked by dates, names, and deaths—are they just coincidences, or are they markers in the code? Every anomaly, every “glitch” in history, could be the system correcting itself, nudging events so the simulation stays on course.

Perhaps we are all characters in a program we cannot see, playing roles assigned long before we were born. Some of us notice the glitches: the strange parallels, the déjà vu, the moments when history repeats itself with impossible precision. And those who notice… are awakened, aware that the world is not what it seems.

Lincoln. Kennedy. The patterns are clues. The simulation is still running. And somewhere, unseen, the programmer watches, shaping reality one line of code at a time.

Short summary:

Lincoln–Kennedy Coincidences

  • Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
  • Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
  • Lincoln became president in 1860.
  • Kennedy became president in 1960.
  • Both were strongly concerned with civil rights.
  • Both were shot in the head on a Friday.
  • Both were succeeded by a Johnson:
    • Andrew Johnson (born 1808), after Lincoln
    • Lyndon B. Johnson (born 1908), after Kennedy
  • Both assassins are known by their three names, each with 15 letters:
    • John Wilkes Booth
    • Lee Harvey Oswald
  • Lincoln was shot in Ford’s Theatre.
  • Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car made by Ford.
  • Booth fled a theater and was caught in a barn.
  • Oswald shot from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Uncategorized

Black Friday and Cyber Monday 2024 were highly successful in the U.S., setting new records for online sales

Black Friday and Cyber Monday 2024 were highly successful in the U.S., setting new records for online sales. Cyber Monday online sales reached an estimated $13.2 billion, a 6.1% increase compared to 2023, making it the largest single-day online shopping event of the year. Similarly, Black Friday online sales grew by 9.9% year-over-year, hitting $10.8 billion.

Overall, the holiday shopping period benefited from increased consumer participation, driven by discounts across categories like electronics, clothing, and home goods. Retailers extended their sales periods, starting promotions as early as November 1, which also helped boost overall spending.

Retailer sales during Black Friday and Cyber Monday 2024 set new records, reflecting strong consumer participation. Total sales for the period from Black Friday through Cyber Monday reached approximately $75 billion in the U.S., a 5% year-over-year increase, marking a new all-time high. Cyber Monday alone drove $13.2 billion in sales, growing by 6.1% compared to 2023, solidifying its position as the biggest shopping day of the year. Online sales for the broader Cyber Week reached $40.6 billion, up 7% from last year, making up 16.9% of the total holiday season sales

Retailers benefited from month-long promotions leading up to Black Friday, helping consumers spread out their spending. In-store shopping saw significant participation, but online shopping was the dominant driver of growth, particularly in categories like electronics and home goods.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Uncategorized

Black Friday 2024 is anticipated to be one of the largest shopping events in recent years

Black Friday and Cyber Monday are among the year’s most anticipated shopping events. These days mark the start of holiday spending for many as shoppers look to score the best deals and discounts ahead of Christmas. Retailers compete fiercely during this period, offering significant price cuts and promotions.

As Black Friday 2024 approaches, consumers and businesses are gearing up for what could be another record-breaking shopping season.

Black Friday 2024 is anticipated to be one of the largest shopping events in recent years, with several emerging trends and consumer expectations shaping the season:

Many consumers are starting their holiday shopping before Black Friday, with 63% planning to hunt for deals well in advance. This reflects a growing preference for extended sales periods that begin in mid-November, reducing the last-minute rush.

Electronics and fashion remain top priorities for most shoppers, with Gen Z particularly focused on fashion and beauty products. Baby Boomers, on the other hand, are showing increased interest in toys, likely for their grandchildren.

Shoppers are expecting significant markdowns, with a 30% discount often considered the baseline for a “good deal.” Bundled offers and bulk discounts are strategies retailers might use to meet these expectations while maintaining profitability.

Smartphone shopping continues to dominate, with over half of online purchases expected to occur on mobile devices. This trend emphasizes the need for mobile-friendly websites and apps.

Younger generations, especially Gen Z, value sustainability, influencing their buying choices. However, willingness to pay a premium for eco-friendly products remains limited.

E-commerce is expected to outperform brick-and-mortar shopping, continuing the trend from recent years where Black Friday online sales reached nearly $10 billion.

Retailers and consumers alike are adapting to these changes, making the 2024 season competitive and dynamic. Early preparation and tech-friendly shopping options are key for both buyers and sellers this year.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Uncategorized

Kamala Harris attacked Donald Trump with lies

Kamala Harris made a speech at the DNC convention party this week, and she warned about the chaos in the White House if Trump is elected. The consequences will be serious, she said. And Michelle Obama mocked Trump`s «black jobs» remark.

What planet are they living on? And who in the world believed all this BS? Trumps Tax cut and Jobs Act of 2017 lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% and stimulated business investments, and economic growth. This also included tax cuts for individuals.

Kamala Harris and Joe Biden did the opposite. They increased the taxes. Increased the cost of living, and the inflation skyrocketed. People today, say they had a better life under Trump than they have under Biden and Harris today.

The tax cuts had a huge impact on the society. The U.S. saw significant job growth, with unemployment reaching a 50-year low of 3,5% in February 2020. This included record-low unemployment rates for African Americans, Hispanics, and women.

As a result of all that Trump has done, the stock market saw substantial gains, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 reacting record-highs during his term, which benefited investors and retirement accounts.

Trump stands for Peace and Prosperity, and Trump is the only president in many decades that haven`t started a war. The Trump administration brokered the Abraham Accords, which led to normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations.

Not only that. Trump is also the man who pushed for NATO allies to increase their defense spending arguing that the U.S was bearing too much of the financial burden. By the end of his term, several NATO countries had increased their contribution.

Not only that. Trump is a businessman, and he knows how things are working in the business-world. He renegotiated NAFTA, leading to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which aimed to create more balanced trade terms for the U.S.

He also implemented tariffs and took a tough stance on China to address trade imbalances and protect American industries. This only a few things Trump did only because he wants to «Make America Great Again».

But Kamala Harris is not a businessman. Nor a businesswoman. She`s a lawyer. And in her speech, she was talking more about Trump than her own policies. Kamala Harris has made statements suggesting that Donald Trump acts primarily in his own self-interest. (Can you believe that?).

During her campaign as Joe Biden`s running mate in 2020, Harris frequently criticized Trump`s leadership and policies. In one of her statements, she said: «Donald Trump has been doing everything to benefit himself and his wealthy friends,» reflecting her view that Trump`s actions as president were motivated by personal gain rather than the broader interest of the American people.

The critique was part of her broader argument that Trump`s administration favored the wealthy and powerful at the expense of working-class Americans and marginalized communities. Harris and Biden both campaigned on the promise of more inclusive and equitable leadership, contrasting their approach with what they described as Trump`s self-serving tendencies.

This is extremely embarrassing because the Democrats have controlled the U.S. in 12 years out of 16. Trump controlled it for 4 years. But what`s strange to me is that Kamala Harris and the Democrats are blaming Trump for all the problems they have in the U.S. This is unbelievable.

As a Vice President, Kamala Harris could have done something about all the problems she is blaming Trump for, but she has been invisible. Most people in the U.S. do not know who she is and what she stands for.

Blaming Trump for all the problems is not a good sign, and the question of whether Kamala Harris would be the right person to serve as President of the United States is subjective and depends on one`s political views, priorities, and perspectives on leadership qualities.

Harris`s approval rating has been mixed, and she has faced criticism from both sides of the political spectrum. Some voters question her effectiveness as Vice President and her ability to lead the nation.

Some critics have pointed out that Harris`s communication style can be perceived as unclear or overly caoutious, leading to questions about her ability to effectively convey her message and rally public support.

Kamala Harris has made statements that have been subject to public scrutiny and criticism. Some of these statements have been characterized by critics as confusing, awkward, or «stupid.» Here is a statement that has been discussed or mocked:

«WE MUST, TOGETHER, WORK TOGETHER TO SEE WHERE WE ARE, WHERE WE ARE HEADED, WHERE WE ARE GOING, AND OUR VISION FOR WHERE WE SHOULD BE, BUT ALSO SEE IT AS A MOMENT, YES, TO TOGETHER ADDRESS THE CHALLENGES AND TO WORK ON THE OPPORTUNITIES.»

This statement, made during a speech in 2022, was criticized for its redundancy and lack of clarity. Here is another one:

«Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine. So, basically, that`s wrong.»

What about this one:

«We are the United States of America because we are united…….because we are states.»

This comment, made during a public appearance, was mocked for stating the obvious in an awkward manner. What about this one:

«I think that there can be no higher priority than what we have been clear is our highest priority.»

Kamala Harris has a huge communication problem as she lacks Obama`s skills. The Democrats have a huge problem if this is an «Operation Female Obama project,»

Joe Biden`s farewell speech at the DNC on August 19, 2024, received mixed reviews as well. Some critics felt the speech lacked a clear vision for the future, especially in comparison to the forward-looking speeches typically expected at such events. This was seen as a missed opportunity to rally the party around a successor or new ideas.

Normally, the polls should make a huge bump by at least 10 points after a meeting with speeches like that, but not this time. Trump is still leading the polls, but Rasmussen Report says it`s going to be a close race.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Uncategorized