Author Archives: Ket Garden

Will AI Destroy Capitalism? What Marx Predicted, and Why It Feels Relevant Today

Artificial intelligence is advancing so fast that some economists, technologists, and futurists believe we are heading toward a historic breaking point. Predictions range from 300 million jobs being automated to AI systems replacing everything from lawyers and teachers to software developers and journalists.

This raises a fundamental question:

If AI takes over most labor, where will people get money from, and can capitalism survive?

Interestingly, this debate echoes ideas written more than 150 years ago by Karl Marx, who warned that capitalism might ultimately be undermined by its own technological progress. Today, his predictions are being pulled back into the spotlight.

This article breaks down what Marx said, what AI is doing, and what the future of labor, and money, might look like.

1. What Marx Actually Predicted

Karl Marx believed capitalism had a built-in conflict:
the drive to replace human workers with machines.

He argued two key points:

A) The “Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall”

Marx said that profit comes from human labor.
But capitalists constantly try to replace human labor with machines because machines:

  • don’t get tired
  • don’t strike
  • don’t demand wages or rights

The more companies automate, the fewer workers they need.

But the paradox is:

If you replace too many workers, you remove the source of profit — human labor.

This, Marx believed, would eventually destabilize capitalism from within.

B) Automation makes workers “superfluous”

Marx predicted a future where technology becomes so advanced that:

  • masses of workers become unnecessary
  • unemployment grows
  • inequality rises
  • social tensions explode

For most of history, this sounded theoretical.
Today, with AI able to perform cognitive work, Marx suddenly feels more contemporary than ever.

2. The AI Shock: Why This Time Is Different

In the past, automation replaced muscle:

  • factory robots
  • tractors
  • machinery

Those technologies eliminated many physical jobs but created others.

AI replaces the brain:

  • analysts
  • accountants
  • teachers
  • programmers
  • designers
  • writers
  • marketers
  • customer support
  • even medical diagnosis

White-collar workers, once considered “safe”, are now at risk.

Reports from groups like Goldman Sachs estimate that 300–800 million jobs worldwide could be automated in the coming years.

For capitalism, this is enormous.
Capitalism is built on two pillars:

  1. Labor → creates value
  2. Wages → let people buy things

If AI replaces too much labor, wages disappear, and the system loses its customers.

This is what worries economists.

3. The Core Economic Problem: No Jobs = No Money = No Capitalism

Here’s the simple logic:

  • Companies automate work → fewer workers
  • Fewer workers → less income
  • Less income → less spending
  • Less spending → companies lose customers
  • Companies lose customers → profits fall
  • Profits fall → economic system breaks

Capitalism needs consumers.
Consumers need wages.
Wages come from labor.
Labor is disappearing.

This is the exact contradiction Marx warned about.

4. What Happens to Society if AI Wipes Out Jobs?

Three major scenarios are being discussed in global economic circles:

A) Capitalism survives but transforms

Governments introduce:

  • Universal Basic Income (UBI)
  • AI and robot taxes
  • redistribution policies
  • national “AI wealth funds”
  • profit-sharing models

This keeps consumers alive even without traditional jobs.

B) Extreme inequality + political instability

If nothing is done:

  • wealth concentrates into a few tech giants
  • middle class collapses
  • consumer markets shrink
  • social unrest rises
  • governments face pressure for reform or revolution

This is the scenario many analysts fear.

C) A transition to “post-capitalism”

This idea doesn’t mean communism. Instead, it means a system where:

  • machines produce most wealth
  • humans work less or not at all
  • value is redistributed through society
  • the wage-labor system becomes obsolete

Some predict a peaceful shift.
Others see a turbulent transition.

5. Will New Jobs Replace the Old Ones?

Historically, technological revolutions created more jobs than they destroyed.

But AI is different for three reasons:

  1. It automates thinking, not just physical effort
  2. New jobs may require skills most people don’t have
  3. AI learns faster than humans can retrain

For the first time, technology is competing with humans in creativity, reasoning, and decision-making.

This makes the future less predictable than any previous industrial revolution.

6. Will AI Destroy Capitalism?

There are three main schools of thought:

1) AI will reshape capitalism, not kill it

The system adapts by creating safety nets like UBI, or by shifting focus to new industries.

2) AI will create “hyper-capitalism”

A handful of mega-corporations control all the AI models and extract enormous profits, leading to an extreme concentration of power.

3) AI will push us beyond capitalism

If machines produce nearly all value, the traditional logic of:

work → wages → consumption

falls apart.

In that case, capitalism as we know it would need to evolve or be replaced.

7. The Short Answer

If AI eliminates hundreds of millions of jobs and nothing is done, capitalism collapses because consumers vanish.

If governments and companies adapt, we enter a new economic era. Perhaps capitalism 2.0.

Marx didn’t predict AI, but he did predict the danger of a system that depends on labor while simultaneously trying to eliminate it. That contradiction is now the central question of the coming decade.

In the end, nobody truly knows where this collision between AI, labor, and capitalism will lead. Some predict unprecedented prosperity, others foresee economic collapse, and many warn that the transition itself may be chaotic.

Even politicians in several countries have started telling people to “buckle up,” hinting that families should keep basic supplies like food and water on hand. Not because disaster is guaranteed, but because the pace of disruption is now faster than society’s ability to adapt.

One thing is sure: we are crossing a threshold into unknown territory, where the old rules may no longer apply. The question is not whether change is coming, but how prepared we are for the world on the other side.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Jobs Will Become “Optional”

When Elon Musk took the stage at the U.S.–Saudi Arabia Investment Forum, he delivered one of his boldest predictions yet:
In 10 to 20 years, having a job may no longer be necessary. It may simply be a choice.

This statement didn’t come out of nowhere. It reflects Musk’s long-standing view that rapid progress in artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics, especially projects like Tesla’s Optimus robot, will fundamentally transform the global job market.

But what does “optional work” actually mean? What happens to CEOs, creativity, money, and everyday life in such a world?


Let’s break it all down.

What Exactly Did Elon Musk Say?

At the forum, Musk explained that technological progress will push society into an era where:

  • Most jobs are automated
  • Human labor is no longer required for economic survival
  • People will work only if they want to, not because they must.

He said that future “jobs” might feel more like hobbies, similar to playing a sport or a video game.

He also suggested that money itself could become less relevant:

“Money will stop being significant. The real constraints will be physical resources like energy and mass.”

Musk compared future work to gardening:
You can grow vegetables yourself, even though it’s easier to buy them at a store. You do it because you enjoy it, not because you must.
That’s his vision for the job market. A world where work is done for passion, not necessity.

A World Where Work Is Optional: What Would That Look Like?

If Musk is right, then the next two decades could reshape society in five significant ways:

1. Automation Takes Over Routine Work

Humanoid robots and advanced AI systems will be capable of doing nearly all physical and cognitive labor.
Everything from manufacturing to accounting to logistics could be automated.

2. Creativity Becomes the New Currency

When machines handle all basic tasks, the only irreplaceable human skill will be imagination.
Art, innovation, design, storytelling, and leadership will matter more than ever.

3. New Purpose Beyond Employment

If people no longer need to work for survival, society must redefine purpose, identity, and meaning.
Work will become a hobby, a passion project, or a personal mission.

4. The CEO Role Will Transform

Future CEOs may lead companies where the entire workforce is digital or robotic.
Their role shifts from:

  • personnel management
    to
  • vision-setting, ethics, coordination, and long-term strategy.

CEOs become more like chief philosophers and architects of systems than traditional managers.

5. Economic Models Must Evolve

If work becomes optional, new systems must support human welfare:

  • universal basic income
  • shared ownership of AI systems
  • new forms of value distribution
  • new definitions of wealth

This brings us to Musk’s most controversial idea:
A future where money itself becomes less meaningful.

Musk’s Claim: Money Could Become “Irrelevant”

This may sound like science fiction, but Musk is pointing toward a post-scarcity economic model:

  • AI and robotics produce unlimited goods and services
  • Energy becomes cheap due to breakthroughs in solar, batteries, and possibly fusion
  • Productivity skyrockets far beyond what human labor can achieve
  • The cost of producing essentials approaches zero

In that world, your livelihood isn’t tied to your paycheck.
Wealth isn’t about dollars. It’s about access to resources and control over energy, materials, and computing power.

Musk referenced Iain M. Banks’ Culture novels as inspiration:
a society where scarcity is gone, AI handles most functions, and humans focus on exploration, creativity, and self-development.

Will This Actually Happen?

Experts disagree. Some believe Musk’s timeline (10–20 years) is too optimistic.
Others argue that AI progress is moving faster than expected, and he may even be conservative.

What’s clear is this:

  • Jobs will change
  • Many roles will disappear
  • New creative and emotional roles will emerge
  • The global economic structure will need deep reform
  • The concept of the “CEO” will adapt dramatically

Whether Musk’s vision becomes reality or remains a theoretical future, the direction is unmistakable:
AI will reshape human work more than any technology in history.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity

Are Humans Still Fit to Govern Themselves?

The Case for AI and the Future of Governance

“For centuries, humans have tried to build fair systems, and failed repeatedly.”

The Human Struggle with Complexity

History shows that people have always struggled to manage complex systems. In ancient Rome, Caesar’s rise exposed deep divisions in society and the limits of human judgment. In 1848, France, King Louis Philippe I faced a population burdened by taxes and inequality, a system too rigid and tangled for leaders to reform.

Today, millions face similar struggles: cost-of-living crises, housing shortages, and economic instability. The pattern is clear; the system often overwhelms human capacity.

Partisanship, emotion, and limited attention make it nearly impossible for humans alone to optimize society’s resources fairly and efficiently.

“If history teaches us anything, it’s that no human institution, however well-intentioned, can keep up with the complexity of modern life.”

Enter AI: A New Kind of Leadership

Maybe the solution isn’t left, right, or even one-party systems. Maybe the solution is AI.

Thousands of human beings, with all their emotions, biases, and limited perspectives, can’t compete with a system that can analyze all available information simultaneously. Just look at chess or Go. AI doesn’t just play well; it plays beyond the limits of human imagination.

Take a simple real-world example: an elderly woman paying more for her apartment than she receives in pension. Who is to blame? No single person. It’s the system. This isn’t a moral failure; it’s mathematical.

AI doesn’t suffer from those human limits. It can process enormous amounts of data, detect patterns, optimize allocations, and predict problems before they occur.

“Maybe the next stage of democracy isn’t about choosing leaders. It’s about choosing the algorithms that lead us.”

A Vision of AI-Guided Society

Imagine a world where decisions about economics, healthcare, infrastructure, or the cost of living are guided by AI. No feelings, no personal interests, no corporate agendas, no short-term political games.

Decisions would be based purely on data, evidence, and long-term outcomes, optimizing for the well-being of everyone rather than the loudest voices or the wealthiest lobbyists.

Humans would still define the ethical framework. AI can calculate the best moves, but society must decide what “good” means: fairness, sustainability, equality, or prosperity.

“Compared to the endless bickering and short-term thinking of politics, AI could be the most rational and forward-looking leader humanity has ever known.”

Balancing Hope and Caution

AI governance isn’t without risks; bias in data, lack of transparency, and accountability must be addressed. But unlike human flaws, these can be debugged. Systems can be retrained, improved, and held to measurable standards of performance.

The question, then, is no longer about political parties or ideologies. The real question is:
Are we ready to let reason, not emotion, guide the future?

Author’s Note

As technology continues to evolve, the debate over AI in governance is no longer a matter of science fiction. It’s a question of readiness, trust, and design. Whether we like it or not, the age of algorithmic leadership is approaching. The choice before us isn’t if AI will play a role in decision-making, but how we’ll ensure it serves humanity, not replaces it.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

The cost of living and the blame game

People are angry, and that’s why they voted for Mamdani as the next Mayor of New York.
People are sick and tired of struggling to make ends meet. In his victory speech, Mamdani said:

“We choose hope over tyranny. Hope over big money and small ideas. Hope over despair. Tonight, we have stepped out from the old into the new.”

His supporters are already marching in the streets, saying they don’t want Trump as a king or a dictator.

Hmm… I think I’ve heard this before.

More than two thousand years ago, in Rome, another man was accused of wanting to be king.
His name was Julius Caesar.

A group of Roman senators assassinated Caesar out of fear that his growing power and titles, especially dictator for life, would destroy the Roman Republic.
They claimed they were saving democracy, but their actions plunged Rome into chaos and civil war.

It was a betrayal that changed history, and a reminder of how fear, power, and instability often go hand in hand.

History Repeats Itself

Fast forward to France, 1848. The people were exhausted. Food prices were soaring, unemployment was rising, and inequality had reached unbearable levels.
King Louis Philippe I, once known as the Citizen King, had promised a fairer, more modern France. But over time, his government became detached from ordinary people’s struggles.

One of the main sources of anger was the tax system. The poor and working class bore a heavy burden through indirect taxes on essentials like food, salt, and fuel, while wealthy landowners and property owners paid relatively little. Voting rights were also tied to property ownership, meaning most citizens had no political voice. When food prices spiked in the late 1840s, ordinary people were paying high taxes on top of already expensive necessities. Economic frustration reached a tipping point.

People in New York voted for Mamdani, who wants to raise taxes and, at the same time, give people fast and free buses. How is that going to be?

When protests erupted in February 1848, the king tried to silence them. Instead, the anger exploded.
Barricades filled the streets of Paris, and after just a few bloody days, Louis Philippe abdicated the throne and fled to England in disguise.

The monarchy collapsed. The Second Republic was born.
But what came next? A new leader. Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte, nephew of Napoleon I, rose to power, promising to restore stability and hope. Within four years, he declared himself Emperor.

Sound familiar?

It’s the same old story: people rise up against a system they believe is unjust, only to end up under a new one that looks strangely similar.
Each era has its slogans: “liberty,” “hope,” “change,” “the people’s revolution”, yet the same problems remain. Prices go up. Ordinary citizens struggle. The rich adapt and survive.

Take a look at France today with its Yellow Vest protesters. People are struggling with their cost of living. I wrote an article about that for the first time, many years ago. And who is to blame now? The King? Napoleon? No, it`s Macron.

So, Why Are Prices Rising Again?

The cost of living has become the defining issue of our time. Food, housing, and energy prices are rising faster than wages. Families feel squeezed, not just in New York or Paris, but across the Western world.

But who is to blame?

It’s tempting to point the finger at politicians, corporations, or billionaires. Yet the truth is more complex. The problem isn’t one person. It’s the system itself.

A mix of factors drives today’s inflation:

  • Global supply chain disruptions from the pandemic and wars.
  • Energy shocks as the world shifts away from fossil fuels.
  • Corporate pricing power in markets where competition has shrunk.
  • Decades of easy money and debt have inflated asset prices but left wages behind.

Governments print money to stimulate the economy, corporations raise prices to protect profits, and central banks hike interest rates to cool inflation, all while ordinary people pay the price.

It’s a cycle that keeps repeating, no matter the century. In ancient Rome, it was grain shortages. In 1848, in France, it was bread and taxes. Today, it’s rent and electricity.

The Real Lesson

Historically, when people struggle, they often look for someone to blame, such as a king, a tyrant, or a president. Get rid of Trump, and everything will be fine. Get rid of Macron, and the sun will shine. They think removing the person will fix the system. But as history shows us, that rarely works.

Trump isn’t the cause of America’s problems. He’s a symptom of them.
Just as Caesar wasn’t the reason Rome was collapsing, but rather the outcome of deep divisions and economic inequality that had built up for years.

When the cost of living becomes unbearable, people revolt. Sometimes at the ballot box, sometimes in the streets.

But unless we learn from history, each “revolution” just sets the stage for the next crisis.

In the end, it’s not about kings or dictators. It’s about systems.
And if we don’t fix the system, the anger, fear, and struggle will continue. Just as it has for more than 2,000 years.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Zohran Mamdani’s Victory Speech: A New York Moment

Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who made history as New York City’s first Muslim mayor, delivered a fiery victory speech last night — one that mixed idealism, populism, and defiance in equal measure. His words echoed the labor struggles of the past while speaking directly to working-class New Yorkers today.

He began with a quote from Eugene Debs:

“The sun may have set over our city this evening, but I can see the dawn of a better day for humanity.”

From there, Mamdani’s message was clear: power was no longer reserved for the wealthy and well-connected.

“Tonight, against all odds, we have grasped it. The future is in our hands.”

Picture: Fast and Free buses in New York City

Throughout his speech, Mamdani painted a vivid portrait of the “new New York” — one built by the city’s diverse working people.

“I speak of Yemeni bodega owners and Mexican abuelas. Senegalese taxi drivers and Uzbek nurses. Trinidadian line cooks and Ethiopian aunties… This city is your city, and this democracy is yours too.”

He connected his campaign to real faces and stories: Wesley, a hospital worker commuting two hours from Pennsylvania; a woman on the Bx33 who said she no longer loved New York; and Richard, the taxi driver he once joined in a 15-day hunger strike.

“My brother, we are in City Hall now,” Mamdani declared — a line that electrified the crowd.

Then came the emotional centerpiece of the speech — a rallying cry that tied hope to transformation:

“We chose hope together. Hope over tyranny. Hope over big money and small ideas. Hope over despair.
Tonight, we have stepped out from the old into the new.”

He went on to outline what that “new age” would look like:

“Central to that vision will be the most ambitious agenda to tackle the cost-of-living crisis that this city has seen since the days of Fiorello La Guardia — an agenda that will freeze the rents for more than 2 million rent-stabilized tenants, make buses fast and free, and deliver universal childcare across our city.
This new age will be one of relentless improvements. We will hire thousands more teachers. We will cut waste from a bloated bureaucracy.”

He also promised a new approach to safety and justice:

“We will work with police officers to reduce crime and create a department of community safety that tackles the mental health crisis and homelessness crisis head-on.
In this new age we make for ourselves, we will refuse to allow those who traffic in division and hate to pit us against one another.”

Mamdani warned against the forces of distraction and division:

“They want the people to fight amongst ourselves so that we remain distracted from the work of remaking a long-broken system.”

His agenda was sweeping: freezing rents, free buses, universal childcare, and stronger unions. He vowed to hold both landlords and billionaires to account — calling out Donald Trump by name several times.

“We will stand alongside unions and expand labor protections because we know, just as Donald Trump does, that when working people have ironclad rights, the bosses who seek to extort them become very small indeed.”

As the crowd cheered, Mamdani tied his personal story to the city’s identity:

“New York will remain a city of immigrants — built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and, as of tonight, led by an immigrant. I am young. I am Muslim. I am a democratic socialist. And I refuse to apologize for any of this.”

The closing lines were pure optimism:

“Together, New York, we’re going to freeze the rent. Together, New York, we’re going to make buses fast and free. Together, New York, we’re going to deliver universal childcare.”

A Speech of Hope and a Hint of Overreach

Wow. It’s hard to deny the power and passion behind Mamdani’s words. His call for “hope over tyranny” and “hope over big money” struck a chord in a city long divided by inequality. Yet, his repeated attacks on Donald Trump made it sound as if Trump himself were the root of all problems. He’s not. Trump exists because of the problems — economic, social, and political — that stretch far beyond New York.

Still, Mamdani’s vision of a city that “shines again” is bold and contagious. Fast and free buses? Frozen rents? Universal childcare? That’s impressive, no doubt. But it also raises the question — if everything becomes free, what about a free lunch?

A Dream Worth Testing

Whether his promises are realistic or merely rhetorical remains to be seen. Mamdani has set the bar sky-high — and with it, expectations from the same working people he vowed to serve. History has shown that idealism can ignite movements, but it’s delivery that defines leadership. For now, though, his message has done what great speeches do best: it made people believe again — not just in politics, but in possibility.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics