Tag Archives: Jesus

Who Is Hamas? The Truth About Gaza’s Rulers

Ordinary people in Gaza hate Hamas and want to get rid of it. But how easy is that when we all know they rule Gaza with an iron fist? If you disagree with them, they will simply silence you. Or kill you. And that’s what’s happening in Gaza right now.

Once Hamas claims to seek peace with Israel, it soon turns its weapons on its own people. Who, then, is Hamas, and what are they really doing?

Origins of Hamas

Hamas (Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah — “Islamic Resistance Movement”) was founded in 1987 during the First Intifada. It grew out of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, promoting a radical Islamist ideology that rejects Israel’s right to exist.

Its 1988 charter openly called for Israel’s destruction and the creation of an Islamic state over all of historical Palestine. From the beginning, Hamas mixed social welfare with terrorism, using religious faith and nationalism to recruit followers and strengthen control.

Brainwashing and Indoctrination

We can ask ourselves where all this hate comes from. But it’s not hard to understand when you see how Hamas uses propaganda and fear to shape generations.

The Nazis once said that a lie repeated enough times becomes the truth. The same can be said about Hamas.

In schools, mosques, and media, they constantly repeat messages of hatred against Jews and Israel. Children are taught that dying as a “martyr” is the greatest honor. The organization glorifies violence and uses religion as a tool of manipulation. This is how the terrorist organization Hamas is recruiting suicide bombers to attack innocent people in Israel.

The Years of Terror

Before Israel built its security barrier (the wall) along the Gaza border, Hamas repeatedly sent young suicide bombers into Israel, especially during the Second Intifada (2000–2005). Civilians were the main targets. People on buses, in cafés, markets, and restaurants.

Some of the worst attacks included:

  • Jerusalem Sbarro Restaurant bombing (2001): 15 killed, over 100 injured.
  • Dolphinarium disco bombing (2001): 21 young people killed.
  • Hebrew University bombing (2002): 9 killed, including U.S. citizens.

Even before Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, militants in Gaza, including Hamas, began firing rockets and mortars into southern Israel. Towns like Sderot and Ashkelon have lived under constant threat ever since.

In 2006, Hamas fighters kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, holding him captive for over five years before finally releasing him in exchange for over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, many of whom had blood on their hands.

Hamas’s Control Over Gaza

Since taking full control of Gaza in 2007, Hamas has turned the area into both a fortress and a prison. They suppress political opponents, control the media, and punish anyone who dares to speak against them.

Billions in international aid meant for rebuilding homes and hospitals have instead been used to build tunnels, buy rockets, and train new fighters.

Ordinary Gazans are the real victims. Trapped between Hamas’s authoritarian rule and the consequences of its endless wars.

What`s disappointing about this case is the legacy media`s unbalanced reports from the conflict. We often hear from poor civilians in Gaza. They usually lie, and sometimes they say people have no home and that it’s cold in Gaza. The fact is that the weather is hot.

The Hidden Face of Hate: When “Support for Gaza” Becomes Antisemitism

In the weeks and months following every escalation in Gaza, television screens, social media feeds, and newspaper headlines fill with global protests and statements of “solidarity with Gaza.” Many of these come from people who genuinely care about the suffering of civilians, and compassion is vital.
But somewhere along the way, something darker has mixed in: a growing wave of disguised antisemitism, hate hidden beneath the surface of supposed “support.”

From Sympathy to Scapegoating

It begins with empathy. People reacting to images of destruction, mourning the deaths of children, and demanding peace. But in protest slogans and online comments, empathy often turns into something else:

  • “Zionists” becomes a code word for “Jews.”
  • Calls for “Free Palestine” are twisted into chants like “From the river to the sea,” which deny Israel’s right to exist.
  • Jewish students, shops, and synagogues in Europe and the U.S. face vandalism or threats, even though they have nothing to do with the Israeli government.

This isn’t solidarity. It’s scapegoating. The line between political protest and racial or religious hate has blurred.

How Hate Disguises Itself

Modern antisemitism rarely looks like the open hatred of the 1930s. Today, it hides behind political and moral language, calling itself “anti-Zionism,” “human rights activism,” or “decolonization.”
But the pattern is the same: blame all Jews for the actions of a few, question their right to safety, and deny their history.

  • In some university protests, Jewish students have been told to “go back to Poland.”
  • Online, “pro-Gaza” threads are flooded with conspiracy theories about Jews controlling governments or media.
  • In demonstrations, Israeli flags are burned alongside slogans calling for “intifada” or “death to the occupiers.”

These aren’t calls for justice. They’re echoes of history, and they’re dangerous.

A Moral Test for the West

True solidarity with Palestinians means demanding an end to terror and manipulation. Not cheering for those who fire rockets from schoolyards. Genuine peace means condemning antisemitism wherever it appears, even when it hides behind fashionable activism.

The West now faces a moral test:
Can we support innocent people in Gaza without reviving one of humanity’s oldest hatreds?
Can we tell the difference between compassion and hate?

The answer depends on honesty and courage. Because antisemitism doesn’t vanish when it changes its name. It only grows stronger in the shadows.

The Media’s Blind Spot

Mainstream media often amplifies this confusion. In their effort to highlight humanitarian crises, many journalists avoid distinguishing between legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and antisemitic rhetoric.
As a result, the public conversation becomes one-sided: Israeli military actions are headline news, while Hamas’s use of human shields, executions of civilians, and years of rocket attacks barely make the front page.

This selective storytelling doesn’t just distort reality. It feeds resentment. It reinforces the false idea that Jews are “the oppressors” and Palestinians “the victims,” without showing that both societies suffer under extremists like Hamas.

The Echo of Lies: How Hate Survives Through Propaganda

Hate rarely starts as hate. It begins as a whisper — a repeated story, a single narrative told again and again until it becomes a kind of truth. History has shown us this pattern many times before. The Nazis understood it all too well: “Repeat a lie often enough, and it becomes the truth.” That same dark psychology is alive today, in new forms and new places.

We see it in Gaza, where Hamas indoctrinates generations through education, media, and religion. Not to seek peace, but to preserve conflict. From childhood, people are taught not only to distrust but to despise. Over time, these beliefs stop feeling like opinions and start feeling like identity. When that happens, reason and compassion disappear.

But this manipulation doesn’t end there. Across the world, much of what we see in legacy media now echoes a similar distortion — not always intentional, but often biased. The story becomes simplified: one side good, one side evil. Complex truths are ignored because they don’t fit the headline. And beneath this imbalance, something ancient and dangerous grows, a modern form of antisemitism disguised as “support for the oppressed.”

People march in the streets, believing they are standing for justice, yet their chants echo the slogans of those who would destroy, not build. Sympathy for innocent civilians in Gaza, which is both human and necessary, is twisted into hatred toward Jews as a whole. It’s a trap of perception, built by years of selective narratives and emotional manipulation.

Meanwhile, Hamas continues to spend vast sums on weapons and tunnels instead of schools and hospitals. Iran and other foreign actors feed this machine of destruction, funding the tools of war while ordinary people suffer in poverty. And still, the cameras turn, the slogans spread, and the lie grows louder.

Propaganda doesn’t only distort the truth. It divides humanity. It turns empathy into anger, and understanding into fear. To fight it, we must learn to question what we’re told. We must see beyond the headlines, beyond the slogans, beyond the images carefully designed to provoke outrage.

The path forward isn’t found in hate, but in clarity. In seeing the difference between the innocent and the manipulative, between compassion and deception. Because if lies can echo, so can truth.

As Plato warned: “Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.” That is why seeking truth is never easy, but it is always necessary.

Conclusion: The Real Enemy of Gaza’s People

Hamas is more than a militant group. They are the ruling power in Gaza with a dual role: political/social authority, and armed resistance. But their priorities often harm the people they claim to represent.

If peace or justice is ever to come, Gaza’s people need rules that protect them, accountability, transparency, and a governing power that places civilian needs above military ambition.

When the world watches the suffering in Gaza, it’s easy to blame Israel. But behind every destroyed building and every tragic image, there’s a more profound truth: Hamas has built its power on the suffering of its own people.

It’s not Israel that keeps Gaza poor and oppressed. It’s Hamas. Until they are gone, peace and freedom will remain out of reach for both Palestinians and Israelis.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Jesus and God: The Anchor in Times of Loss

At Charlie Kirk’s funeral, the atmosphere was heavy with grief, yet also charged with hope. Friends, family, and followers reflected on Kirk’s legacy, weaving together memories of his activism with deep expressions of faith.

What stood out most wasn’t politics or ideology. It was the repeated invocation of Jesus and God as the ultimate source of comfort.

When tens of thousands gathered to honor Charlie Kirk, it quickly became clear that the memorial was not merely about a man. It was about something far greater: faith in Jesus Christ and the eternal hope found in God.

(Picture: A golden sunrise breaking through clouds – symbolizing hope, resurrection, and God’s eternal light after darkness.)

Speakers reminded the congregation that Kirk’s life, though tragically cut short, was not the end of his story. “Charlie is watching from above,” one said, pointing to the Christian belief in eternal life. The message was clear: while death silences the body, the soul remains alive in the presence of God.

This belief is not abstract. The Bible itself reassures the grieving: “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more” (Revelation 21:4). Such promises shift the perspective from despair to hope, from loss to continuity.

The funeral also underlined a greater truth. That faith provides resilience when the world seems unbearable. Whether one personally shares this faith or not, the testimony of the mourners demonstrated how belief in God can transform sorrow into strength.

Speakers repeatedly returned to the same truth. Charlie’s life was grounded in the Gospel. His wife, Erika Kirk, delivered words that stunned many: “I forgive him because it is what Christ did, and it is what Charlie would do.” In those few sentences, she reminded the world that forgiveness is not a sign of weakness, but rather a divine strength.

Her words echoed Jesus Himself: “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.”

The service emphasized that political ideology is not the ultimate solution for humanity’s struggles. As Tucker Carlson boldly put it, “The real solution is Jesus, not politics.” Senator Marco Rubio also spoke of salvation history, pointing to Christ’s suffering, death, resurrection, and promised return.

These are not abstract ideas. They are the very heartbeat of Christianity. Charlie Kirk’s friends and loved ones testified that his mission was not only to debate culture and politics but also to lead people to Christ.

He wanted to save young men from despair, hatred, and sin, pointing them to a better path in God.

Faith also framed the way people spoke about Charlie’s death. Again and again came the assurance that he is “watching from above.” That his soul is in the hands of God. This belief brought comfort to thousands, serving as a reminder that life is more than what we see.

Ultimately, the memorial turned into a proclamation: Jesus is Lord, God is faithful, and forgiveness is possible even in the darkest hour.

The takeaway is simple but profound: human leaders rise and fall, tragedies strike without warning, but God remains constant. In the words of Christ:

I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

Charlie Kirk’s life and death are now a testimony to that truth.

Many people around the world don’t believe. Many are sceptical, and perhaps the deepest response to skepticism about faith comes not from a preacher, but from psychiatrist Carl Jung himself. He had a lot of clients and saw things ordinary people didn`t see.

When asked if he believed in God, Jung replied: “Believe? I know!”

That certainty. The unshakable conviction that God is real was the foundation of Charlie Kirk’s life and mission. It is also the hope that sustains millions today.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Óscar Romero: The Voice of the Voiceless

Óscar Arnulfo Romero, the Archbishop of San Salvador, became one of the most important moral voices of the 20th century. Known as “the voice of the voiceless,” he stood against injustice, poverty, and state violence in El Salvador during a time of deep political and social turmoil. His assassination in 1980 shocked the world and transformed him into a global symbol of faith, courage, and human rights.

Early Life and Church Career

Romero was born on August 15, 1917, in Ciudad Barrios, El Salvador. He entered the seminary at an early age and was ordained as a priest in 1942. For decades, Romero was regarded as a conservative and cautious church leader, prioritizing pastoral duties over politics. His appointment as Archbishop of San Salvador in 1977 was welcomed by El Salvador’s ruling elite, who saw him as someone unlikely to challenge the status quo.

Transformation and Advocacy

However, Romero’s outlook changed dramatically after witnessing the growing violence in El Salvador and the suffering of the poor. A pivotal moment came with the assassination of his close friend, Father Rutilio Grande, a Jesuit priest who worked with marginalized rural communities. From then on, Romero became an outspoken critic of human rights abuses, corruption, and the repression carried out by El Salvador’s military-backed government.

Every Sunday, Romero’s sermons were broadcast nationwide by radio. He used them to denounce violence, call for peace, and demand justice for the poor. His words inspired hope among the oppressed but provoked anger among the powerful.

Assassination

On March 24, 1980, Romero was shot and killed while celebrating Mass at a hospital chapel in San Salvador. His assassination, carried out by a death squad linked to the government, marked a turning point in El Salvador’s history. His funeral, attended by hundreds of thousands, was violently disrupted by gunfire and bombs, symbolizing the brutality of the era.

Legacy

Romero’s death did not silence his message. Instead, it amplified it worldwide. He became an enduring symbol of the struggle for justice and human dignity. His example continues to inspire human rights defenders, faith leaders, and activists worldwide.

In 2015, Pope Francis beatified Romero, declaring him a martyr. On October 14, 2018, he was canonized as a saint by the Catholic Church, officially recognized for his commitment to defending the poor and oppressed.

Conclusion

Óscar Arnulfo Romero’s life and death reflect the power of moral courage in the face of oppression. He stood alongside the marginalized when it was most dangerous to do so, and in doing so, became a beacon of hope. More than four decades after his assassination, Romero’s voice still resonates: a call for justice, peace, and unwavering solidarity with the voiceless.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Politics

Human Rights Advocates and the Risks They Face – From Jesus to Modern Times

Throughout history, a clear pattern emerges: those who stand up for justice, freedom, and human dignity often become targets of violence or repression. From religious leaders to political activists, many have paid the ultimate price—or suffered imprisonment—for their message.

Lincoln was shot because he was working on human rights. John F. Kennedy was shot because he was working on human rights. Martin Luther King Jr was shot because he was working on human rights. Olof Palme was shot because he was working on human rights. Lincoln was shot at a theater. So was Olof Palme.

Jesus – The First Great Human Rights Advocate?

Jesus of Nazareth, who lived over 2,000 years ago, can be seen as one of the earliest and most significant champions of human dignity. He taught love, forgiveness, and equality, consistently placing the marginalized and oppressed at the center of his message.

His teachings challenged both religious authorities and the political powers of his time, symbolizing a new understanding of justice and humanity. As a result, he was perceived as a threat—not only to religious leaders but also to the Roman authorities. His fate, crucifixion, demonstrates how power often reacts violently to those who challenge it.

Lincoln, Kennedy, MLK, Gandhi, Palme, Thrane, and Other Advocates

History echoes itself in remarkable ways:

  • Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery in the United States. He was assassinated in 1865 by John Wilkes Booth, who viewed him as a threat to the Southern states.
  • John F. Kennedy, U.S. President and advocate for civil rights, was shot in 1963.
  • Martin Luther King Jr. led the fight for African American rights and was assassinated in 1968.
  • Robert F. Kennedy was killed during the 1968 presidential campaign; he, too, championed equality and justice.
  • Mahatma Gandhi fought for India’s independence and nonviolent resistance, and was assassinated by a Hindu extremist in 1948.
  • Óscar Romero, Archbishop of El Salvador, was murdered in 1980 for defending the poor and oppressed.
  • Olof Palme, Prime Minister of Sweden, was assassinated in 1986 for his outspoken support for human rights, both domestically and internationally. Palme advocated for social welfare, equality, and global justice, and spoke out against oppression worldwide.
  • Marcus Thrane, Norway (1817–1890), was a pioneering labor and social reform leader. He fought for workers’ rights, universal male suffrage, and social equality. Though not assassinated, Thrane was imprisoned for challenging authorities, showing that human rights advocacy often provokes severe repression.

Why These Individuals Were Seen as Threats

Human rights advocates challenge power structures:

  • They question privilege and the status quo.
  • They mobilize people and give a voice to the oppressed.
  • They become symbols—living icons of hope and change.

Extremists or authorities who respond with violence or repression may include:

  • Political extremists who aim to maintain unjust systems.
  • Religious extremists who feel threatened by their beliefs or traditions.
  • Authoritarian regimes are unwilling to tolerate criticism or popular mobilization.

A Timeline of Human Rights Advocates Who Faced Assassination or Repression

YearNameRole / ContributionCircumstances
~30 ADJesus of NazarethAdvocated love, equality, and justiceCrucified in Jerusalem; seen as a threat by religious and political powers
1851Marcus ThraneNorwegian labor and social reformerImprisoned for activism and challenging authorities
1865Abraham LincolnU.S. President; abolished slaveryAssassinated by John Wilkes Booth
1948Mahatma GandhiIndian independence leader; nonviolent resistanceAssassinated by Hindu extremist Nathuram Godse
1963John F. KennedyU.S. President; civil rights supporterAssassinated in Dallas
1965Malcolm XAfrican-American civil rights leaderAssassinated by political/religious extremists
1968Martin Luther King Jr.Civil rights leader; racial equalityAssassinated by James Earl Ray
1968Robert F. KennedyU.S. Senator; civil rights advocateAssassinated by Sirhan Sirhan
1980Óscar RomeroArchbishop; defender of the poorMurdered by military-backed death squad
1986Olof PalmePrime Minister of Sweden; human rights and global justiceAssassinated in Stockholm while walking home

A Pattern Through History

From Jesus to MLK, Gandhi, Palme, and Thrane, a consistent thread is evident: those who dare to fight for human rights place themselves at risk. Assassinations and imprisonments of such individuals are not random; they represent a perceived threat to power and control.

Yet, their deaths or repression often amplify their influence rather than end it. They become symbols inspiring millions, showing that the fight for justice continues even after the heroes are gone.

Conclusion

History teaches us that standing up for justice can be dangerous, but also essential. From the crucifixion of Jesus to modern human rights defenders like Olof Palme and reformers like Marcus Thrane, we see how power and oppression react to threats and how individuals can transform the world through courage and conviction.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity, Politics, Uncategorized

The colorful eggs you decorate are actually symbols of a new life and rebirth, and it can`t be a better time to do it now

It`s Friday, and I`m on my way to our cabin. Right now it is a blue sky, and the sun is shining. There is a lot of snow, and it is around -20 degrees. I look forward to going skiing. We`re also planning to fish

and sleep outside for a night or two.

This is what easter is for us, but do people know why we celebrate easter? Just ask people around you. Many take it for granted but don`t even know why we are celebrating easter, and all these special days we have in front of us.

But let`s take the short version. Easter, Latin Pascha, Greek Pascha, is a principal festival of the Christian church, which celebrates the Resurrection of Jesus Christ on the third day after his Crucifixion.

Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels.com

By the 4th century, the Easter vigil was well established in various liturgical expressions. It was characterized by a spirit of joyful anticipation of the Resurrection and, because of the belief that Jesus’ second coming would occur on Easter, the return of Jesus.

The Christian community believes that the times we are living in right now are the end times. They say we have all the signs we need to understand that the end times are here. It simply marks the end of something and the beginning of another thing. the end of one circle, and the beginning of a new and bigger one. This is where we are right now.

This leads me to easter and eggs. The colorful eggs you decorate with your family are actually symbols of a new life and rebirth. It couldn`t be a better time than now, to decorate the eggs as we see the apocalypse around us right now.

Along with the eggs comes the Easter Bunny, but its origins are not necessarily rooted in Christianity. The exact origins of the anthropomorphic rabbit are not clear. However, since ancient times, the hare has been said to represent rebirth.

Furthermore, they also believe that Jesus’ Second Coming will happen very soon. They say so because it is described in the bible. Christians have said so for many, many years, but let`s wait and see.

The date of Easter changes yearly. In 2023, the celebration will fall on Sunday, April 9. Easter Sunday will take place on April 9 in 2023, which is just over a week earlier than the one we had last year.

Easter is determined by the Sunday following the first full moon after the vernal (or spring) equinox. For example, in 2023, the vernal equinox is on 20th March, and the following full moon is on the 6th April. Therefore, Easter is on the 9th.

As Morgan Freeman said, the story of God can be found in the Church of Notre Dame in France. This is where you can see «the crown of thorns». Many will take a trip at Easter this year. The holy relics are symbols of the divine here on earth.

As such, they can and do fall under the control of people who would use them for earthly power. But for those who are seeking spiritual strength, relics act as a speaker.

Speaking of faith that guides them through the distractions of this mortal realm to a more direct connection with God.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosity