“For centuries, humans have tried to build fair systems, and failed repeatedly.”
The Human Struggle with Complexity
History shows that people have always struggled to manage complex systems. In ancient Rome, Caesar’s rise exposed deep divisions in society and the limits of human judgment. In 1848, France, King Louis Philippe I faced a population burdened by taxes and inequality, a system too rigid and tangled for leaders to reform.
Today, millions face similar struggles: cost-of-living crises, housing shortages, and economic instability. The pattern is clear; the system often overwhelms human capacity.
Partisanship, emotion, and limited attention make it nearly impossible for humans alone to optimize society’s resources fairly and efficiently.
“If history teaches us anything, it’s that no human institution, however well-intentioned, can keep up with the complexity of modern life.”
Enter AI: A New Kind of Leadership
Maybe the solution isn’t left, right, or even one-party systems. Maybe the solution is AI.
Thousands of human beings, with all their emotions, biases, and limited perspectives, can’t compete with a system that can analyze all available information simultaneously. Just look at chess or Go. AI doesn’t just play well; it plays beyond the limits of human imagination.
Take a simple real-world example: an elderly woman paying more for her apartment than she receives in pension. Who is to blame? No single person. It’s the system. This isn’t a moral failure; it’s mathematical.
AI doesn’t suffer from those human limits. It can process enormous amounts of data, detect patterns, optimize allocations, and predict problems before they occur.
“Maybe the next stage of democracy isn’t about choosing leaders. It’s about choosing the algorithms that lead us.”
A Vision of AI-Guided Society
Imagine a world where decisions about economics, healthcare, infrastructure, or the cost of living are guided by AI. No feelings, no personal interests, no corporate agendas, no short-term political games.
Decisions would be based purely on data, evidence, and long-term outcomes, optimizing for the well-being of everyone rather than the loudest voices or the wealthiest lobbyists.
Humans would still define the ethical framework. AI can calculate the best moves, but society must decide what “good” means: fairness, sustainability, equality, or prosperity.
“Compared to the endless bickering and short-term thinking of politics, AI could be the most rational and forward-looking leader humanity has ever known.”
Balancing Hope and Caution
AI governance isn’t without risks; bias in data, lack of transparency, and accountability must be addressed. But unlike human flaws, these can be debugged. Systems can be retrained, improved, and held to measurable standards of performance.
The question, then, is no longer about political parties or ideologies. The real question is: Are we ready to let reason, not emotion, guide the future?
Author’s Note
As technology continues to evolve, the debate over AI in governance is no longer a matter of science fiction. It’s a question of readiness, trust, and design. Whether we like it or not, the age of algorithmic leadership is approaching. The choice before us isn’t if AI will play a role in decision-making, but how we’ll ensure it serves humanity, not replaces it.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee the accuracy of this information. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Who are you gonna listen to if you want real news? Don`t tell me that you`re listening to the legacy media? A bunch of liers who are telling you that Donald Trump is a lier. A bunch of liers who are telling you that Kamala Harris can be the best president ever. 100% Fake News!
Legacy media is also telling you that Kamala Harris is winning in the polls now, but if you are SANE, you know that this is impossible!
One we can trust and listen to is Rasmussen Report. They know what they are talking about, and they have done this many times before. Is really Kamala Harris winning? Rasmussen Report is here to tell you the truth; she`s not.
The truth is telling us that the Democratic Party is collapsing. This is terrible. This day in history, four years ago, Joe Biden was winning by more than 7 points. Eight years ago, Hillary Clinton was winning by 16 points, and that is 8 more points than Harris today.
Keep in mind that many of the names on the list in this video are corporate entities or have a deep well of public funding. Rasmussen Report is the only pollsters on the same list that will shut down if they fail to be accurate. I`m not a right-wing politician, and I don`t care much about the war between left and right. What I really care about is the truth.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
The legacy media and the leftists have always mocked and attacked people on the right side. They all mocked Trump when he was sitting in the Oval office, and when Biden entered the Oval office, they were all so happy.
«The adults are back in charge», they said. Various CNN commentators, and analysts discussed the notion of Biden bringing «the adults back in the room» to restore order, professionalism, and competence to the executive branch.
This sentiment reflected a broader narrative that Biden`s presidency marked a return to experienced, steady, and conventional governance after the tumultous, and often unconventional tenure of Donald Trump.
The legacy media emphasized Biden`s experience, professionalism, and the perceived return to normalcy, and stability in American politics.
But people on the other side said he was too old, and had too much cognitive issues. Biden was stumbling and mumbling, and he had often trouble to walk up and down the stairs to and down from the plane.
Who on earth wants to give a man like this access to the nuclear button?
All the people on the left side were shocked after the debate battle on TV with Trump. They got even more shocked when he tried to cover up all the mess in an interview on TV. He also called Zelenskyy for President Putin.
A few days after this shock, Obama told him to step down, and now the most unpopular Vice President, Kamala Harris will run for office. Wow.
It`s very, very interesting to see the same pattern here. Now, the legacy media and leftists are «blown away» after Kamala`s first speech. She lied about Trumps abortion policy, and Trumps tax cuts.
It seems like they have the best candidate on earth. Much better than Biden.
Some media members hailed the speech that left them with «chills.» They were «blown away.» Some said they jumped out of their seat higher than others.
«There was a twinkle in her eye. There was a kick in her step that, you know when you`re vice president….. you`re not loose. There`s somebody above you, somebody you don`t want to overshadow them.
And this was quite the coming out. I got chills when she said, «Donald Trump: I know your type.» That was like, Wow, she`s going to prosecute this case,» MSNBC pundit Donny Deutsch said.
He continued, «And I was blown away. I was like, I kind of fell in love with her. I thought she was smart, engaging. She`s feisty, twinkle in your eye, punch you in the gut. I mean, everything you kind of want. And I just thought it was a great, great opening act.»
«Bear with me, I`m jumping out of my seat over here watching this. People have been thirsting for this,» The Bulwark» podcast host Tim Miller exclaimed.
MSNBC guest Maya Wiley agreed, «I`m with Tim – Tim, I`m jumping out of my seat higher than you, my brother. I`m just going to say that.»
Over on CNN, more pundits celebrated the speech as a direct attack, and threat against Trump.
As of July 2024, polls show a tight race between Donald Trump, and Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential election. RealClearPolitics average indicates Trump leading slightly with 47.5% compared to Harris’ 45,9%.
NBC pollster Hurls Kamala Harris’ Candidacy into a furnace. The expert analyst was throwing her candidacy into the toilet. If we scrutinize the numbers, we can clearly see that Biden and Harris have bad numbers, and it hasn`t changed.
Running basic Monte Carlo on Trump vs Harris polling data is telling us that Trump will win by 87,2%. Kamala Harris raises $100 million after Biden`s withdrawal. The game is on.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Everybody on this planet has something to say about the press, and I`m talking about the MSM (Mainstream Media). The fun fact is that most people don`t call it MSM anymore, but Legacy Media. And that for a reason.
May 3 is an important day. Not only for the press, but for all the citizens of the planet. Today it is the World Press Freedom Day, and this day was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in December 1993.
On the 3rd of May, the world once again comes together to commemorate World Press Freedom Day. A time to reflect on the importance of a free press in upholding democracy, fostering transparency, and ensuring accountability.
As we mark this occasion in 2024, the role of the press in the digital age takes center stage, presenting unprecedented opportunities, and formidable challenges.
Press freedom lies at the heart of democratic societies, serving as a cornerstone of liberty, and progress. It empowers journalists to hold power to account, uncover truths, and amplify voices that might otherwise go unheard.
A free press i essential for informing the public, shaping public discourse, and safeguarding the values of democracy.
The Richard Nixon Foundation applies the legacy and vision of President Richard Nixon, America’s relentless grand strategist, to defining issues facing our nation and the world.
But today we are all facing new challenges. The proliferation of misinformation, and disinformation has blurred the lines between fact and fiction, undermining trust in traditional media outlets, and eroding the foundations of informed decision-making.
Previously, printed media wanted a good story to sell as much newspapers as possible. Today, the printed press is slowly dying, and the digital era has changed the game. They still want a good story, but now they want clicks and as much views as possible. At any cost.
In 2024, World Press Freedom Day is dedicated to the importance of journalism, and freedom of expression in the context of the current global environment crisis. Awereness of all aspects of the global environmental crisis, and its consequences is essential to build democratic societies.
Jornalistic work is indispensable for this purpose.
To achieve sustainable development, it is necessary for jornalists to report accurately, timely, and comprehensively on environmental issues, and their consequences, as well as on possible solutions.
Journalists and Media isn`t always doing the right thing, and that`s why so many people around the world have lost their trust, and listen more to blogs on internet. Former U.S President Richard Nixon warned us all about this decades ago.
In 1983, Nixon said the problem is that Media has a sense of self-righteousness. A double standard on issue after issue after issue. They can find everything wrong with somebody else, but they will not look inside, and never admit that they could be wrong themselves.
«Presidential power is limited. Limited by the courts. Limited by the congress. The media`s power is unlimited». Nixon said.
Nixon was concerned about the media landscape at that time, but he also talked about the competition. There is only on paper, he said. The Washington Post is the only major newspaper being printed in the most important capital in the world.
«I wouldn`t like to leave the fate of this country to the editors of the Washington Post,» Nixon said.
The first amendment has been abused by reporters. It`s used basically as a license, he said. Nixon said that the case «Sullivan versus New York Times» is an affect, a license to lie. Because they can tell an untruth. Print an untruth, which some of them consciously do.
They do it because they will sell newspapers, and some of them can win a prize. And then they can always get behind the barrier under that case of saying: «Well I didn`t intend any malice. I had no malice. They will do anything to get a story, and ratings matters.
John F. Kennedy talked about the same. So did Eisenhower. But Nixon also said that he believe in a free press. He didn`t want government control under any circumstances or government censorship of either radio, television or newspaper.
I`m simply suggesting here that all of the media should look within themselves. Look in the mirror now and then, rather than looking out there to others, Nixon said.
World Press Freedom Day 2024 serves as a timely reminder of the indispensable role that a free press plays in upholding democracy, fostering accountability, and safeguarding human rights. As we confront the challenges of the digital age, let us renew our commitment to defending press freedom, and nurturing a media environment (online and offline) where truth can flourish, and democracy can thrive!
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shinybull.com. The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, neither Shinybull.com nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities, or other financial instruments. Shinybull.com and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
The impeachment is over. It was unfair and constitutionally incoherent dangerous. The Hate Trump Media Mob said Abuse of Power about Trump`s behaviour, but that is a lie. It is the House that has abused its power. Not Trump.
The U.S Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel said this on the Senate floor regarding the Senate Impeachment Trial yesterday:
«These past weeks, the Senate has grapped with as grave a subject as we ever consider: A request from a majority in the House of Representatives to remove the president.
«The Framers took impeachment extremely seriously. But they harbored no illusions that these trials would always begin for the right reasons. Alexander Hamilton warned that the demon of faction would extend his scepter over the House of Representatives at certain seasons.
«He warned that an intemperate or designing majority in the House might misuse impeachment as a weapon of ordinary politics rather than an emergency tool of last resort.
McConnell said it`s the House that has abused its power. Not Trump.
«They called the Senate, quote; the most fit depositary of this important trust. Tomorrow, we will know whether that trust was well placed.
«The drive to impeach President Trump did not begin with the allegations before us. Here was reporting in April of 2016; Donald Trump isn`t even the Republican nominee yet….. (but) Impeachment is already on the lips of pundits, newspaper editoras, constitutional scholars, and even a few members of Congress.
Did you see that? The impeachement started long before he was elected. Huh…. (editors note).
«Here was the Washington Post headline minutes after President Trump`s inauguration: The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun.
«The articles of impeachment before us were not even the first ones House Democrats introduced. This was go-around number seven. Those previously-alleged High Crimes and Misdemeanors included things like being impolite to the press and to professional athletes.
«This insults the intelligence of the American people to pretend this was a solemn process relutantly begun because of withheld foreign aid. No, Washington Democrats position on this President has been clear for years.
«Their position was obvious when they openly rooted for the Mueller investigation to tear our country apart were disappointed when the facts proved otherwise. It was obvious when they sought to impeach this President over and over.
«Here`s their real position; Washington Democrats think President Donald Trump committed a High Crime or Misdemeanor the moment he defeated Secretary Clinton in the 2016 election. That is the original sin of this presidency: That he won and they lost.
«Ever since, the nation has suffered through a grinding campaign against our norms and institutions from the same people who keep shouting that our norms and institutions need defending.
«A campaign to degrade our democracy and deligitimize our elections from the same people who shout that confidence in our democracy must be paramount.
«We have watched a major American political party adopt the following absurd proposition: We think this president is a bull in a china shop, so we`re going to drive a bulldozer through the china shop to get rid of him.
«This fever led to the most rushed, least fair, and least thorough presidential impeachment inquiry in Amerian history.
« The House inquiry into President Nixon spanned many months. The special prosecutors investigation added many more months. With President Clinton, the independent counsel worked for years.
«Here`s how Chairman Schiff put it back in October. Quote: Any action,,,,, that forces us to litigate, or have to consider litigation, will be considered further evidence of obstruction of justice.
«That is nonsense. Impeachment is not some magical constitutional trump card that melts away the seperations between the branches of government. The Framers did not leave the House a secret constitutional steamroller that everyone somehow overlooked for 230 years.
«When Congress subpoenas executive-branch officials with questions of privilege, the two sides either reach an accommodation or take to the courts.
«That is the way this works.
«The abuse of power charge is just as unpersuasive and dangerous.
«By passing that article, House Democrats have into a temptation that every previous House has resisted. They impeached a president without even alleging a crime known to our laws.
(How in the world is it possible? Editors note).
«I do not subscribe to the legal theory that impeachment requires a violation of a criminal statue. But there are powerful reasons why, for 230 years, every presidential impeachment did allege a criminal violation.
«The Framers explcitly rejected impeachment for maladministration – a general charge under English law that basically encompassed bad management; a sort of general vote of no confidence. Except in the most extreme circumstances, except for acts that overwhelmingly shocked the national conscience, the Framers decided presidents must serve at the pleasure of the electorate and not the pleasure of House majorities.
«As Hamilton wrote: it is one thing to be subordinate to the laws, and another to be dependent on the legislative body.
«So House Democrats sailed into new and dagerous water. The first impeachment unbound by the criminal law. Any House that felt it needed to take this radical step owed the country the most fair and painstaking process; the most rigorous investigation; the most bipartisan effort. Instead, we got the opposite. The exact opposite.
«The House Managers argued that the President could not have been acting in the national interest because he acted inconsistently with their own conception of the national interest, a conception shared by some of the President`s subordinates.
«This does not even approach a case for the first presidential removal in Amercan history.
«Such an act cannot rest alone on the exercise of a constitutional power, combined with concerns about whether the President`s motivations were public or personal, and a disagreement over whether the exercise of the power was in the national interests.
«The Framers gave our nation an ultimate tool for evaluating a President`s character and policy decisions. They`re called elections.
«Frankly, it is hard to believe that House Democrats ever really thought this reckless and precedent-breaking process would yield 67 votes to cross the Rubicon. Was their vision so clouded by partisanship that they really believed this would be anywhere near enough for the first presidential removal in American history?
«Or was success besides the point? Was this all an effort to hijack our institutions for a month-long political rally? Either way, the demon of faction, has been on full display. But now it is time for him to exit the stage.
«We have indeed witnessed an abuse of power: A grave abuse of power by just the kind of House majority the Framers warned us about. So tomorrow, the Senate must do what we were created to do. We have done our duty. We have considered all arguments. We have studied the «mountain of evidence.» And tomorrow, we will vote.
«We must vote to reject the House`s abuse of power. Vote to protect our institutions.
«Vote to reject new precedents that would reduce the Framers design to rubble.
«Vote to keep factional fever from boiling over and scorching our Republic.
«I urge every one of our coleagues to cast the vote that the facts in evidence, the Constitution, and the common good clearly require.
«Vote to acquit the President of these charges.»
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Shiny bull. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Shiny bull nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in precious metal products, commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Shiny bull and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Ket Garden
Shiny bull 